Skip to main content

Between Art, Society, Representation, and Subjectivity: Wojtek Ziemilski’s Prolog

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intermedial Performance and Politics in the Public Sphere

Part of the book series: Avant-Gardes in Performance ((AGP))

  • 645 Accesses

Abstract

Wojtek Ziemilski is one of the most important contemporary Polish artists, whose main interest is the relationship network between the theatre, media, and society. In Prolog [Prologue] (2011), Ziemilski uses the mechanisms of Real Time Composition and devising theatre to explore the possibilities of social choreography in the age of omnipresent, interactive media and political crisis. The chapter describes how Ziemilski’s unusual performance contributed to the development of modern political theatre in Poland—theatre that can transform the awareness of spectators, activate, provoke, and emancipate them. Ziemilski’s performance is similar to a video game in which the people practice useful decision-making, analogous to real political life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Latour’s network theory, a medium—or, as he prefers, a mediator—translates and shapes the translation of forces from one point of reality to the next. See Latour 2005.

  2. 2.

    See: Auslander 2008, especially the chapter ‘Is it live, or …?’.

  3. 3.

    All translations from the Polish are those of the author.

  4. 4.

    Real Time Composition has been developed by Portuguese choreographer João Fiadeiro since 1995. In the first stage, its main framework was the need to create a system of composition that could be shared by his collaborators in the creative process. In the second stage, it emerged as a tool to explore modalities of dramaturgical writing within the dance field, and was studied, developed and used by several artists and researchers. The goal of the Real Time Composition method is to put the maker in the position of ‘mediator’ and ‘facilitator’ of the events, blocking his temptation to impose himself by means of the will or the ability to manipulate them. His only ‘creative act,’ should there be any, amounts to the mastery with which he handles the tension, the balance and potential of the material he is dealing with, letting things happen—if they really have to—by themselves. Fiadeiro focuses on processes of taking decisions and making choices, asking questions: What criteria and parameters shall we choose to take one decision or another? How to share them in a group, not letting the conversation turn into a field of competition or resignation? See: http://joaofiadeiromenugb.blogspot.com, accessed 1 November 2016.

  5. 5.

    See Hewitt 2005.

  6. 6.

    Prolog; concept and direction: Wojtek Ziemilski; collaboration: Sean Palmer and Iza Szostak; video projection technology: Marcin Ebert; lighting direction: Karolina Gębska; production: Krakow Theatrical Reminiscences i Ochota Theatre w Warszawie; premiere at the Krakow Theatrical Reminiscences, 6 October 2011. While analysing this performance, I use, to a large extent, the detailed description-review I have made for Didaskalia . See Burzyńska (2011).

  7. 7.

    All quotations from Prolog are from Ziemilski’s unpublished playscript.

  8. 8.

    Examples: ‘Are you usually are late to the theatre? If so, take a step back. If not, please don’t move. During any performance, has it occurred to you that you had left the iron turned on or an open window in your home? If so, take a step back.’

  9. 9.

    Initially, the sentence was used in its literal meaning: Kantor put in on the doors of the room where his The Return of Odysseus after Stanisław Wyspiański was performed. It was in 1942, during the German occupation of Poland—making and watching theatre in Polish was forbidden, artists were persecuted and Kantor’s ensemble had to perform underground. After the war it became a metaphor of artists’ and audience’s responsibility.

  10. 10.

    Conclusions of the research of theatre audience in Poland (using sociological tools, like questionnaires, interviews, etc.) conducted between 2011 and 2015 can be found here: http://www.badanieteatru.pl/

References

  • Auslander, Philip. 2008. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski, Mateusz, and Małgorzata Sugiera. 2012. Konszachty z medialnością. Didaskalia 107: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzyńska, Anna R. 2011. Foyer rzeczywistości. Didaskalia 106: 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handke, Peter. 2002 [1966]. Offending the Audience. In Contemporary German Plays II, trans. Michael Roloff, 23–50. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Andrew. 2005. Social Choreography: Ideology as Performance in Dance and Everyday Movement. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, Brenda. 1993. Computers as Theatre. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepecki, André. 2006. Exhausting Dance: Performance and the Politics of Movement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirek, Macias, Puś Bartek, and Wojtek Ziemilski. 2012. Medium czy gadżet? Wideo w teatrze. Interview by Mateusz Borowski and Małgorzata Sugiera. Didaskalia 107: 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1979 [1758]. Letter to d’Alembert on Spectacles. In Reveries of the Solitary Walker, trans. Peter France. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajewska, Dorota. 2012. Pod okupacją mediów. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, Jan. 2016. It’s Political Economy, Stupid! Towards Progressive Modes of Participation. In Joined Forces: Audience Participation in Theatre, ed. Anna R. Burzyńska, 14–33. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Samuel. 2004. Theatricality as Medium. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wojtek Ziemilski: Prolog. 2012. Ruhrtriennale Festival. Accessed 1 November 2016. http://archiv.ruhrtriennale.de/www.2012.ruhrtriennale.de/en/programm1/produktionen/prolog/index.html

  • Ziemilski, Wojtek. 2011. Prolog. Unpublished Playscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Mainstreamów jest mnóstwo. Interview by Arek Gruszczyński. Dwutygodnik 85, June. Accessed 19 September 2017. http://www.dwutygodnik.com/artykul/3722-mainstreamow-jest-mnostwo.html

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2013. The Year of Dreaming Dangerously. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burzyńska, A.R. (2018). Between Art, Society, Representation, and Subjectivity: Wojtek Ziemilski’s Prolog. In: Arfara, K., Mancewicz, A., Remshardt, R. (eds) Intermedial Performance and Politics in the Public Sphere. Avant-Gardes in Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75343-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics