This concluding chapter will bring together all the arguments discussed so far and draw inferences from these. Ways to frame the issue of gun violence to persuade members of the public and legislators to support tighter gun laws are firstly detailed. The results of the 2016 presidential election, resulting in the Trump administration, are compared to what a Clinton victory could have meant for the gun violence prevention movement. The resources, goals and activities of interest groups in a post Sandy Hook context are thereafter critiqued. Combining all that has been discussed thus far allows for future projections to be made about the gun violence prevention movement, particularly after the recent incidence of the worst mass shooting in the US history.
KeywordsSocial movement Framing Gun violence prevention Clinton Trump Interest group
- Beckett, Lois. 2017. NRA Cheers Nomination of Neil Gorsuch, Seen as Gun Rights Defender. The Guardian, February 1. http://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/feb/01/neil-gorsuch-gun-rights-nra. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
- Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckman. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allenlane.Google Scholar
- Brown, Heath. 2008. Interest Groups, the White House and the Administration. In New Directions in Interest Group Politics, ed. Matt Grossmann, 118–153. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Callaghan, Karen, and Frauke Schnell. 2005. Introduction: Framing Political Issues in American Politics. In Framing American Politics, ed. Karen Callaghan and Frauke Schnell, 1–17. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- de Valle, Lauren. 2017. Massachusetts Becomes First State to Ban Bump Stocks Since Vegas Massacre. CNN, November 9. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/06/us/massachusetts-bump-stock-ban/index.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2017.
- Diaz, Daniella. 2017. A Month After Las Vegas Shooting, There’s Still No Bump Stock Regulation. CNN, November 2. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/01/politics/bump-stock-gun-debate-congress/index.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2017.
- Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Elliott, Philip, Haley Sweetland, and Charlotte Alter. 2017. After the Massacre. TIME, October 16.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- ———. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Fleming, Anthony K. 2012. Gun Policy in the United States and Canada: The Impact of Mass Murders and Assassinations on Gun Control. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Gallup. 2016. Guns: Gallup Historical Trends. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
- Gardner, Dan. 2008. Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear. London: Virgin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
- Goss, Kristin A. 2006. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Holyoke, Thomas T. 2014. Interest Groups and Lobbying: pursuing Political Interests. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Hrebenar, Ronald J., and Ruth K. Scott. 1982. Interest Group Politics in America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
- Jones, Michael A., and George W. Stone. 2015. The U.S. Gun Control Paradox: Gun Buyer Response to Congressional Gun Control Initiatives. Journal of Business and Economics 13 (4): 167–174.Google Scholar
- Kingdon, John W. 1984/2003. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Moore, Michael. 2013. America, You Must Not Look Away (How to Finish Off the NRA), March 13. Michael Moore Personal Webpage. http://blog.michaelmoore.com/post/85700192513/america-you-must-not-look-away-how-to-finish-off. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.
- Noel, Hans. 2008. Political Parties and Ideology: Interest Groups in Context. In New Directions in Interest Group Politics, ed. Matt Grossmann, 196–229. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. 2016. Opinion on Gun Policy and the 2016 Campaign, August 26. http://www.people-press.org/2016/08/26/opinions-on-gun-policy-and-the-2016-campaign/. Accessed 17 Mar 2017.
- Shen, Fuyuan. 2004. Effects of News Frames and Schemas on Individuals’ Issue Interpretations and Attitudes. J& MC Quarterly 81 (2): 400–416.Google Scholar
- Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 1990. Policy: A New Field of Anthropology. In Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power, ed. Cris Shore and Susan Wright, 3–39. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Spies, Mike, and Ashley Balcerzak. 2016. The NRA Placed Big Bets on the 2016 Election, and Won Almost All of Them. OpenSecrets.org, November 9. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/11/the-nra-placed-big-bets-on-the-2016-election-and-won-almost-all-of-them/. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
- Stone, Peter. 2016. NRA to Spend $15m on Ads to Defeat Hillary Clinton in Key States. The Guardian, September 16. http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/16/nra-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-gun-control. Accessed 25 Feb 2017.
- Stroud, Angela. 2015. Good Guys with Guns: The Appeal and Consequences of Concealed Carry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- The New York Times. 2017. N.R.A. Supports New Rules on Bump Stock Devices, October 5. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/us/las-vegas-shooting.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2017.
- van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Vitali, Ali. 2018. Trump Says He’ll Ban Bump Stocks Through Executive Order. NBC News, March 1. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/whitehouse/trump-says-he-ll-ban-bump-stocks-through-executive-order-n852021. Accessed 3 Mar 2018.
- Vizzard, William J. 2015. The Current and Future State of Gun Policy in the United States. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 104 (5): 880–903.Google Scholar