Abstract
This chapter addresses the second of the three dimensions of the negotiation as learning model advanced through the book – The Three Dimensions of Negotiation framework. Drawing on a range of empirical data, it elaborates how workers are engaged in a range of multiple and simultaneous negotiations through their work. Workers are found to enact composite negotiations – those that pre-mediate current activity, and contiguous negotiations – those that are enacted simultaneously in current activity. Negotiation as frame elaborates these temporal and co-continuous aspects of negotiation as the personal negotiation frame or context in and through which workers enact their practice. Such a perspective on learning as negotiation enables work-learning to be seen as workers’ negotiation and renegotiation of the negotiations in which they are engaged – and there are many. Taken together, these numerous negotiations may be said to comprise the ‘frame’ in, of and by which workers enact their practice as personal practice. This frame is personally constructed, not by the individual as sole arbiter of their engagement in activity, but by the individual worker as unique construer and thereby, unique investor of self in the negotiations that constitute their learning and work. Negotiation as frame enables the socio-personal significance of work-learning to be identified as workers’ subscription rather than workers’ obligation to the practices that comprise their work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashton, D. (2004). The impact of organisational structure and practices in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(1), 43–53.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.
Billett, S. (2006a). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(1), 53–69.
Billett, S. (2006b). Work, subjectivity and learning. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Billett, S. (2008). Learning throughout working life: A relational interdependence between personal and social agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 39–58.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1975). Knowing and the known. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Ellstrom, E., Ekholm, B., & Ellstrom, P. E. (2008). Two types of learning environment: Enabling and constraining a study of care work. Journal of Workplace Learning., 20(2), 84–97.
Ellstrom, P. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435.
Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work., 14(1), 133–156.
Engestrom, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Etelapelto, A., & Saarinen, J. (2006). Developing subjective identities through collective participation. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning (pp. 157–178). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organisational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Community of practice or practices of a community? In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 514–530). London: SAGE.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004). The significance if individuals’ dispositions in workplace learning: A case study of two teachers. Journal of Education and Work, 17(2), 167–182.
Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. London: Routledge.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leontyev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality (M. Hall, Trans.). London: Prentice-Hall.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piaget, J. (1968). Structuralism (C. Maschler, Trans. & Ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Smith, R. (2006). Epistemological agency: A necessary action-in-context perspective on new employee workplace learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), 291–304.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56–74). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, R. (2018). Negotiation as Frame. In: Learning in Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75298-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75298-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75297-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75298-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)