Skip to main content

Loss of Community Identity: Should It Be Considered a Crime If It Is Linked to Environmental Deterioration?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Crime in Mexico

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology ((PSGC))

  • 301 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with the large real estate and commercial developments that have been proliferating in suburbs of Mexico City, like Xoco, Santa Fe, and Xochimilco, which instigate environmental, social, and cultural transformation of these sites. The legal system has tried to regulate the environmental, social, economic, and urban impacts caused by human activity in order to mitigate or compensate for the damages caused. However, in the majority of these megaprojects, political and economic interests have taken priority over environmental protection, causing changes in land use, loss of biodiversity, and change of habits and activities of the original population. The environmental degradation is a product of the corruption that prevails in the high spheres of government and that privileges unscrupulous developers under false greenwashing schemes that turn the natural heritage into commercial profit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Miquixtli is a fiesta that takes place in honour of the deceased in Mexico. It comes from the belief that year after year the souls of the deceased abandon their graves to visit their loved ones. In their honour, shrines and offerings are put out with candles that light up their path, water to purify their soul, and food and drink that they liked when they were alive.

  2. 2.

    This is a pre-Hispanic ritual dance. The magazine ‘México desconocido’ refers to a legend as to the origin of this ceremony and says: ‘Many years ago, a bad drought hit the Señoria de Totonacapan area [now the states of Veracruz and Puebla] causing havoc among the villages in the region and killing a large number of inhabitants. A group of wise, old people entrusted some virtuous, young locals to locate and remember the tallest tree, strong and growing straight up from the mountain, to use in a ritual accompanied by music and dance, with the aim of asking the gods for kindness so that they would grant them heavy rainfall that would make the land fertile again. This ritual had to be carried out at the top of the tree, so that the enthusiastically voiced prayers were heard high up by their protectors’ (México Desconocido 2017).

  3. 3.

    Mexican cuisine was recognised as Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity on 16th November 2010.

  4. 4.

    Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity is the name given by UNESCO to ‘all that patrimony that must be safeguarded and consists of the recognition of the uses, representations, expressions, knowledge and techniques transmitted from generation to generation and which infuse communities and groups with a sense of identity and continuity, thereby contributing to the promotion of respect for cultural diversity and human creativity’ (UNESCO 2017).

  5. 5.

    The authorisation is written in Document Number 101, DGAU.09/DEIU/052/2009.

  6. 6.

    The Progressive City project was authorised with the resolution File 046/DIUL/2009, which contains the report of studies of urban development: Dictamen de Estudios de Impacto Urbano número DGAU.09/DEIU/052/2009, dated 4th September 2009, concerning the property located in Avenida Universidad no. 1200 and Mayorazgo no. 130 in Xoco. The borough of Benito Juárez is under the protection of the Regional office for Urban Development and Permits. Ruling contained in document no. 101/2079 DGAU.09/DEIU/052/2009 on 4th September 2009.

  7. 7.

    The authorisation in terms of the environment is reflected in the ruling number SMA/DGRA/DEIA/005376/2009.

  8. 8.

    The Official Gazette of the Federation on 7 May 1992 published the declaration establishing Xochimilco and San Gregorio Atlapulco, DF as protected natural areas.

  9. 9.

    See the following residential developments for examples of the environmental claims made: http://citytowersgreen.com/; https://casas.trovit.com.mx/listing/venta-estrene-departamento-en-city-towers-green-colonia-del-valle.1_1S1F1c141cW1b; https://casas.mitula.mx/casas/departamentos-ecologicos-mexico; and, http://diada.landing.digital/

  10. 10.

    The Official Gazette of the Federation on 26 September 2014 published the AGREEMENT that establishes the General Guidelines for incorporation and permanence in the Magic Towns Program.

References

  • CONABIO. (2006). Capital natural y bienestar social. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Val, J. (2004). México. Identidad y nación. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, G. L. (2013). Special Report: El DF, paraíso de las inmobiliarias. Proceso 2079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, G., & Schteingart, M. (Coords.). (2010). Los grandes problemas de México In Desarrollo urbano y regional (Vol. 2, 1st ed., p. 657). Mexico: El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2000). Un mundo desbocado (pp. 26–31). Madrid: Ed. Taurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, O., Acosta, M. & Medina, H. (2007). La memoria negada de la Ciudad de México: sus pueblos originarios. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • INAH. (1986). La Parroquia de San Sebastián Mártir fue declarada Monumento Histórico. 1° de Septiembre de 1932. Catálogo Nacional de Monumentos Históricos Inmuebles. National Institute of Archaeology and History.

    Google Scholar 

  • INAH. (2013). Consejo de Arqueologia. National Institute of Archaeology and History. Available at: http://consejoarqueologia.inah.gob.mx/?p=6804. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.

  • Inestrosa, S. (1994). Vivir la fiesta: un desenfreno multimediado. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investigaciones Geográficas. (1993). La isla de calor urbano de la Ciudad de México a finales del siglo XIX. Revista. Vol. 26. Jáuregui Ostos Ernesto. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, F. L. (2007). Globalización y Medio Ambiente. INAFOCAM, 1, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • México Desconocido. (2017). Los Voladores de Papantla. México Desconocido. Available at: http://www.mexicodesconocido.com.mx/los-voladores-de-papantla.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.

  • Official Diary of the Federation. (2015, December 21). Monday, Section 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazos, F. (2012). Velan por la iglesia del Pueblo de Xoco. Excelsior 27 de octubre de 2017. Available at: http://www.excelsior.com.mx/2012/02/01/comunidad/806869. Accessed 25 Oct 2017.

  • Pérez, D., Jiménez, U., & Castillo, O. (2014). Larga vida a las chinampas. Claustronomía. Revista gastronómica digital, Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre-Louis, K. (2012). Green washed: Why we can’t buy our way to a Green Planet. USA: Ig Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Red de Investigación Urbana. (2011). El pueblo de Xoco: preservación y resistencia. Sección: TESTIMONIO. Domínguez Prieto, Olivia. Revista Ciudades, 23, 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servi, A. (2002). El Derecho Ambiental Internacional. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales 14. Available at: http://www.mexicodesconocido.com.mx/los-voladores-de-papantla.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.

  • Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Available at: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015. Accessed 25 Oct 2017.

  • Tribunales Colegiados de Circuito. (2016). Derechos humanos a la salud y a un medio ambiente sano. La eficacia en el goce de su nivel más alto, implica obligaciones para el Estado y deberes para todos los miembros de la comunidad. Tesis del Semanario Judicial de la Federación. Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Federación.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2017). Patrimonio Inmaterial. Oficina de la UNESCO en México. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/new/es/mexico/work-areas/culture/intangible-heritage/. Accessed 25 Oct 2017.

  • Valenzuela, A. (2007). Santa Fe (México): Megaproyectos para una ciudad dividida. Cuadernos Geográficos, 40, 53–66. Universidad de Granada. Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martínez-Trejo, C.C.L. (2018). Loss of Community Identity: Should It Be Considered a Crime If It Is Linked to Environmental Deterioration?. In: Arroyo-Quiroz, I., Wyatt, T. (eds) Green Crime in Mexico. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75286-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75286-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75285-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75286-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics