Abstract
The case of shale gas extraction by the hydraulic fracturing method is analysed in the framework of the recently enacted energy reform in Mexico. The majority of the extraction of this gas is restricted to the basins of the Coastal Plain of the Gulf of Mexico. Gas and condensate are also known to be present in the Gulf of California, but the volume of the reserves in this sedimentary basin is not yet known or exploited. There are different opinions regarding the use of shale gas, but the evaluation of this extraction method shows that it is unreliable, that gas emissions to the atmosphere occur, and that it requires a lot of water that is not recovered because it is contaminated with chemicals and radioactivity. In Mexico, no studies have been done on the environmental impact of shale gas extraction at any of the extraction sites, and many of these sites are within protected natural areas and hydrological priority areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Petroleum Institute (API). (2014). Available at: http://www.api.org/. Accessed 5 June 2014.
Annevelink, M. P., Meesters, J. A., & Hendriks, A. J. (2016). Environmental contamination due to shale gas development. Science of the Total Environment, 550(2016), 431–438.
Biello, D. (2010, March 30). What the frack? Natural gas from subterranean shale promises U.S. energy independence. With environmental costs. Scientific American.
Brand, A. B., Wiewel, A. N. M., & Campbell Grant, E. H. (2014). Potential reduction in terrestrial salamander ranges associated with Marcellus shale development. Biological Conservation, 180(2014), 233–240.
Cárdenas, L. (1938, December 22). Iniciativa de Ley que adiciona el párrafo sexto del artículo 27 constitucional. Available at: http://presidencia.gob.mx/reformaenergetica/assets/descargas/reforma-cardenas/motivos_reforma_constitucional_1940.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). (2015). Regiones Prioritarias de México. Available at: http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/. Accessed 10 June 2015.
De la Vega-Navarro, A., & Ramírez-Villegas, J. (2015). El gas de lutitas (Shale gas) en México. Recursos, explotación, usos, impactos. Economía UNAM, 12(34), 79–105.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (1917). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (1940, November 9). Decreto que adiciona el párrafo sexto del artículo 27 constitucional (Petróleo). Available at: http://presidencia.gob.mx/reformaenergetica/assets/descargas/reforma-cardenas/dof_1940_constitucion.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2013). Decreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en Materia de Energía. Available at: http://www.dof.gog.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5327463&fecha=20/12/2013. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
Energy Information Agency (EIA). (2012). Annual Energy Outlook. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2012).pdf
Flewelling, S. A., & Sharma, M. (2013). Constraints on upward migration of hydraulic fracturing fluid and brine. Groundwater, 52(1), 9–19.
Flewelling, S. S., Tymchak, M. P., & Warpinski, N. (2013). Hydraulic fracture height limits and fault interactions in tight oil and gas formations. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(14), 3602–3606.
Garaicochea-Petrirena, F. (2015). Rentabilidad del gas “shale” en la cuenca de Burgos, pp. 191–194 En: Morales-Aragón, E. y J. J. Dávalos-López. 2015. Reforma para el saqueo. Foro Petróleo y Nación. Ed. Proceso. Mexico City.
Garza-Castro, J. M. (2015). Desastre ecológico de la Reforma Energética, pp. 465–487 En: Morales-Aragón, E. y J. J. Dávalos-López. 2015. Reforma para el saqueo. Foro Petróleo y Nación. Ed. Proceso. Mexico City.
Kawata, Y., & Fujita K. (2001, April 17–19). Some predictions of possible unconventional hydrocarbon availability until 2100. Paper SPE 68755-MS presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Jakarta. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2118/68755-MS. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.
Manzanares-Rivera, J. L. (2014). Uso de agua en la extracción de gas de lutitas en el noreste de México. Retos de regulación ambiental. Estudios Sociales, 22(44), 173–197.
Sánchez-Cruz, A. A. (2015). Métodos de explotación y extracción de Gas contenido en lutitas. Tesis Profesional. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, p. 172.
Sener. (2011). Discurso del Secretario de Energía el 17 de noviembre de 2011. Available at: http://www.energia.gob.mx/portal/Default.aspx?id=2074. Accessed 5 June 2015.
Valadés, D. (2015). Sobre la Reforma Energética de 2013. Declaración a la Nación, pp. 21–25 En: Morales-Aragón, E. y J. J. Dávalos-López. 2015. Reforma para el saqueo. Foro Petróleo y Nación. Ed. Proceso. Mexico City.
Vengosh, A., Warner, N., Jackson, R., & Darrah, T. (2013). The effects of shale gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing on the quality of water resources in the United States. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 7, 863–866.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González Hernández, A.J. (2018). Shale Gas Extraction, Energy Reform, and Environmental Damage. In: Arroyo-Quiroz, I., Wyatt, T. (eds) Green Crime in Mexico. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75286-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75286-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75285-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75286-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)