Skip to main content

Security at the Centre of Post 2000 EU–Africa Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Regional and Global Security

Abstract

At the 2007 Africa—8European Union (EU) summit, a Joint Africa–EU Strategy (JAES) was agreed upon that defined the long-term policy orientation between the two continents. A partnership in peace and security (JAES P&S) received a prominent place within the Strategy. 2017 is a special year for the continent-to-continent relationship since it marks up its 10th anniversary. Understanding the outcome of the JAES P&S one needs to assess and analyse on the one hand, the role that ideas (such as e.g. the paradigm changes in the conceptualisation of security, its nexus to development and regional integration) had on informing the standing up of JAES P&S, and on the other hand analyse the inter-institutional interactions needed in the implementation of this partnership.

The original version of this chapter was revised: The chapter author name has been corrected. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75280-8_11

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    APF was created in 2003 upon a request by African leaders. It is funded through the EDF: €440 million for the period 2004–2007; €300 million for 2008–2010 and for 2013 alone €232 million were contracted. In 2007 it received additional funding through the voluntary contributions of EU MS. African countries also contribute, i.e. South Africa. APF is at the centre of JAES P&S priority action three. Its aims were twofold: support African led PSOs and capacity building for APSA including RECs. For instance, to African PSOs: €300 million to AMIS; €15.5 million to AMISOM; €23.4 million to FOMUC/CAR; €5 million to AMISEC; while in 2013.

  2. 2.

    Initiated through an agreement between France and the UK in 2005–2006, and adopted by the EU in May 2006, was intended as the framework for implementing ESA, with the focus of supporting the establishment of AU APSA, including the creation of ASF, This focus has been transferred to JAES P&S.

  3. 3.

    The EU Council established the position of an EU delegation exclusively dedicated to the AU. The position is a double-hatted, meaning it represents both the Council as the EU Special representative (EUSR) and the Commission as the Head of its Delegation.

  4. 4.

    Established by the European Council in February 2008, with the aim of providing with decisive resources in order to implement the JAES P&S, ‘coordinating all related activities’ within the Council Secretariat.

  5. 5.

    This factor will be handled at greater length on the following section of this same chapter ‘Conceptualisation of Security & Securitisation of External Borders’.

  6. 6.

    The Göteborg Programme concerns issues of conflict prevention with a focus on especially long-term commitments.

  7. 7.

    The APF established in 2003, has come to be a major financing source to African Peace and Security Operations (PSOs) as well as to capacity building projects for APSA. Established in 2007, If S is an instrument that focuses on crisis management and peacebuilding concerning both short- and long-term interventions, and is envisioned as a complement especially to EDF and APF, in either to kick-start an initiative or when both EDF and PAF have temporarily run out. The budget for urgent interventions in Africa for 2007–2008 amounted to €64 million. DCI Thematic Budget Lines for Africa concern i.e. funds that enhance the collaboration between non-state actors and local authorities.

  8. 8.

    Operation Artemis was launched on 12 June 2003, with the aim to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe in Ituri, in the North East of DRC, as a result of violent fighting between the Hema and Lendu ethnic groups. The operation was explicitly mandated by the UN’s Security Council (Resolution 1484) in order to maintain the security in the camps hosting the internally displaced, secure the airport in Bunia and protect civilians, UN staff and humanitarian agencies in the region. It was intended as a bridging mission till the mandate of the United Nations Mission in the DRC (MONUC) was reinforced and its strength increased.

  9. 9.

    It has, though, to be said that the outcomes of these relationships are dependent upon the political will of EU MS.

  10. 10.

    UK, since 2001, has considerably invested in developing African peacekeeping capabilities in former colonies via the British Peace Support Teams, which became part of an ambitious interdepartmental programme: the Africa Conflict prevention Pool (ACPP). The departments involved are that for International Development (DfID), the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

References

  • Allen, D., and M. Smith. 2002. External Policy Developments. Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review of the European Union 2001/2002. 40: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G. 1969. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63 (3 September): 689–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1st ed. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G., and P. Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagayoko, N., and M.V. Gibert. 2007. The European Union in Africa: The Linkage between Security, Governance and Development—From an Institutional Perspective. IDS Working Paper 284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, S. 2010. Solutions Not Yet Sought: A Human Security Paradigm for Twenty-First-Century Africa. In US Strategy in Africa: AFRICOM, Terrorism and Security Challenges, ed. J.D. Francis. Oxon, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, B., and U. Wissenbach. 2007. EU–China–Africa Trilateral Development Cooperation: Common Challenges and New Directions. DIE-GDI Discussion Paper 21/2007, Bonn, German Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, M., and J., Monar. 2002. 11 September and the Challenge of Global Terrorism to EU as a Security Actor. Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review of the European Union 2001/2002 40: 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsu, K.O. 2007. EU–Africa Pledged New Strategic Partnership. Ghana Web. Available at: http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=135637. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler (eds.). 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd ed. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueger, C., and P. Vennesson. 2009. Security, Development and the EU’s Development Policy. Firenze: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F.J., W. Kühne, and J.B. Honwana. 2000. Reflection Paper: Priorities in EU Development Cooperation in Africa: Beyond 2000. Brussels: Council of Ministers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2003. European Security Strategy (ESS) A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy. Brussels. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • Council of the European Union. 2007. The Africa–EU Strategic Partnership: A Joint Africa–EU Strategy. Brussels. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/97496.pdf; The Joint Official Website of the JAESP available at: http://www.africa-eu-partnership.org/. Both last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • Council of the European Union. 2014. Fourth EU–Africa Summit Road Map 2014–2017. Brussels. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2014/04/pdf/fourth-EU-Africa-Summit-ROADMAP-2014-2017/. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • de Jong, S., J. Woulters, and S. Sterky. 2013. The EU in Multilateral Security Governance: The Case of Russian-Ukrainian Gas Dispute. In The EU and Multilateral Security Governance (Routledge Advances in European Politics), ed. S. Lucarelli, L. van Langenhove, and J. Woulters. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimier, V. 2003. Institutional Change Within a Multinational Organisation: Life and Death of DG DEV (European Commission) 1958–2002. Edinburgh: European Consortium for Political Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEAS. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger EuropeA Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels: EEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elowson, C. 2009. The Joint Africa–EU Strategy: A Study of the Peace and Security Partnership. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency/FOI.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2008. Commission Staff Working Document: Commission Contributions to the Implementation of the EU–Africa Action Plan (2008–2010). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria, F. 2004. La Gestion des Crises en Afrique Subsaharienne: Le Rôle de l’Union Européenne. ISS Occasional Paper 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, H. 2003. European Security: The End of Territorial Defence. Brown Journal of World Affairs 9 (2): 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasius, M., and M. Kaldor. 2005. Individuals First: A Human Security Strategy for the European Union. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 1: 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnesotto, N. (ed.). 2004. EU Security and Defence Policy: The First Five Years (1999–2004). Paris: Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, E. 2015. It’s Geopolitics, Stupid: Explaining Russia’s Ukraine Policy. Global Affairs 1 (1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, A. 2007. Janus Advances: An Analysis of EC Development Policy And the 2005 Amended Cotonou Partnership Agreement. European Foreign Affairs Review 12: 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helly, D., and C. Rocca. 2013. The Mali Crisis and Africa–Europe Relations. ECDPM Briefing Note 52. Available at: http://ecdpm.org/fr/publications/la-crise-au-mali-et-les-relations-afrique-europe/. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • Helly, D., E.A. Bekele, S. El Fassi, and G. Galeazzi. 2014. The Implementation of the Joint Africa Europe Strategy: Rebuilding Confidence and Commitments, ECDPM Study Commissioned by DG for External Policies of the Union for the European Parliament. Available at: http://ecdpm.org/publications/implementation-joint-africa-europe-strategy-rebuilding-confidence-commitments/. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • House of Lords. 2005–2006. The EU and Africa: Towards a Strategic Partnership, 34th Report of Session 2005–06, vol. I. London: House of Lords.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen, M.-T. 2007. New Donors: China’s Africa Policy as a Prime Example. Development Policy Briefing 02/07, Swiss Agency for Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek, M. 2013. The EU as a ‘Target’ of Russia’s ‘Energy Foreign Policy’. In The EU: A Global Actor? Global Leadership, ed. S.B. Gareis, G. Hauser, and F. Kernic. Berlin/Oplade: Barbara Budrich Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangala, J. 2014. Africa and the US AFRICOM. In Handbook of Africa’s International Relations, ed. T. Murithi. Oxon, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivet, B. 2006. Security by Proxy? The EU and (Sub)Regional Organisations: The Case of ECOWAS. ISS Occasional Papers No. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirozzi, N. (ed.). 2010. Ensuring Peace and Security in Africa: Implementing a New Africa—EU Partnership. Rome: IAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • SN 106/4/00 REV 4. Africa–Europe Summit under the Aegis of the OAU and the EU, Cairo, 3–4 April 2000 ‘Cairo Declaration’. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_PRES-00-901_en.htm. Last accessed 27 June 2017.

  • Soeterdorp, P. 1999. Foreign Policy in the European Union. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzaska, A., and J. Moeller. 2008. The African Peace Facility. European Commission DG DEV & DG AIDCO. Brussels. Available at: http://europafrica.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/african-peace-facility.ppt. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

  • Sundelius, B. 2001. The Seeds of a Functional Security Paradigm for the European Union. Paper presented at the Second Pan-European Conference on EU Politics of the ECPR Standing Group on European Union Politics (note 37).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. 2001. Global Governance, Development and Human Security: Exploring the Links. Third World Quarterly 22 (2): 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Veen, E. 2006. Order in World Politics: An Inquiry into the Concept, Change, and the EU’s Contribution. UNU-CRIS Occasional Papers, 02006/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, R.G. 2002. The Fall, and Rise, of Civilian Power Europe? Paper presented at the Conference on the European Union in International Affairs, National Europe Centre, Australian National University, 3–4 July. Available at: https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41589/. Last accessed on 27 June 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lola Raich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raich, L. (2018). Security at the Centre of Post 2000 EU–Africa Relations. In: Frankowski, P., Gruszczak, A. (eds) Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Regional and Global Security . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75280-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics