Skip to main content

Does Conventional Economics Fit Reality?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Economics

Abstract

As it is often the case in history, what is now considered conventional started off as a revolution. Economics is no exception. The revolution began in the early 1970s, especially in the work of Robert Lucas (Nobel Prize winner in 1995) at the University of Chicago, and its name was New Classical Economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Building on the minimum variance approach, in the theory developed by Markowitz, the investor maximizes a utility function, which is given by expected return, variance, and a new parameter, measuring absolute risk aversion. The parameter of absolute risk aversion is assumed to be positive, because all investors are assumed to be risk-averse. A negative value would imply that an investor is risk-loving.

  2. 2.

    In a CDS, flows are similar to those implied by insurance contracts. Counterparty A pays to Counterparty B on a regular basis an amount X. In case the credit entity of interest defaults, Counterparty B pays to Counterparty A a predetermined lump sum and the swap ends.

References

  • Barro, R.J. 1974. Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. 2010. Speech at the Conference Co-sponsored by the Center for Economic Policy Studies and the Bendheim Center for Finance, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branas-Pereira, L.C. 2009. The Two Methods and the Hard Core of Economics. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 31 (3): 493–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. 1991. Efficient Capital Markets: II. The Journal of Finance 46 (5): 1575–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., and J.D. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 607–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics. In Essays in Positive Economics, ed. M. Friedman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. 1976. Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. In The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, ed. K. Brunner and A. Meltzer. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, American Elsevier.

  • ———. 1977. Understanding Business Cycles. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 5, Stabilization of the Domestic and International Economy, ed. K. Brunner and A. H. Meltzer. Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Adaptive Behaviour and Economic Theory. In Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology, ed. R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder, 217–242. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H. 2000. Beyond Greed and Fear; Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. 2010. Building a Science of Economics for the Real World. In Hearing before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Committee on Science and Technology. House of Representatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz, K.G., and G. Gigerenzer. 2012. Cognitive Processes in Decisions Under Risk are not the Same as in Decisions Under Uncertainty. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6: 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghisellini, F., Chang, B.Y. (2018). Does Conventional Economics Fit Reality?. In: Behavioral Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75205-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75205-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75204-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75205-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics