Forensic Document Examination: Who Is the Writer?

  • Aline Maria M. M. Amaral
  • Cinthia O. de Almendra Freitas
  • Flávio Bortolozzi
  • Yandre Maldonado e Gomes da Costa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10657)

Abstract

This work presents a baseline system to automatic handwriting identification based only on graphometric features. Initially a set composed of 12 features was presented and its extraction process demonstrated. In order to evaluate the efficiency of these features, a selection process was applied, and a smaller group composed only of 4 features (GS = Goodness Subset) present the best writer identification rates. Experiments were conducted in order to evaluate the performance, individually and in group, of the graphometric features; and to identify the number of writers that significantly affect the accuracy of the system. The accuracy of the system applied to 100 different writers taking account the GS features set were 84% (TOP1), 96% (TOP5) and 98% (TOP10). These results are comparable to others in the literature on graphometric features. It can be observed that gradually the relation between the number of writers and accuracy is stabilized, and with 200 writers the results are maintained.

Keywords

Graphometry Feature extraction Forensic letter 

References

  1. 1.
    Sheikholeslami, G., Srihari, S.N., Govindaraju, V.: Computer aided graphology. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Essex, England, pp. 457–460 (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sreejaj, M., Idicula, S.M.: A survey on writer identification schemas. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 26(2), 23–33 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Plamondon, R., Lorrete, G.: Automatic signature verification and writer identification: the state of the art. Pattern Recogn. 37(2), 107–131 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bensefia, A., Paquet, T., Heutte, A.: A writer identification and verification system. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 26(13), 2080–2092 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blankers, V., Niels, R., Vuurpijl, L.: Writer identification by means of explainable features: shapes of loops and lead-in strokes. In: Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 17–24 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schomaker, L., Franke, K., Bulacu, M.: Using codebooks of fragmented connected-component contours in forensic and historic writer identification. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 28, 719–727 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luna, E.C.H., Riveron, E.M.F., Calderon, S.G.: A supervisoned algorihm with a new differentiated-weighting scheme for identifying the author of a handwritten text. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 32, 1139–1144 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amaral, A.M.M.M., Freitas, C.O.A., Bortolozzi, F.: Feature selection for forensic handwriting identification. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Washington: (IAPR), vol. 1, pp. 10–15 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morris, R.N.: Forensic Handwriting Identification: Fundamental Concepts and Principles. Academic Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schomaker, L.: Writer identification and verification. In: Ratha, N.K., Govindaraju, V. (eds.) Advances in Biometrics: Sensor, Algorithms and Systems, pp. 247–264. Springer, London (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-921-7_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franke, K., Rose, S.: Ink-deposition model: the relation of writing and ink deposition processes. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (IWFHR 2004), pp. 173–178. IEEE Computer Society (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schomaker, L., Bulacu, M.: Automatic writer identification using connected-component contours and edge based features of upper-case western script. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(6), 787–798 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Said, H.E.S., Tan, T., Baker, K.: Writer identification based on handwritings. Pattern Recogn. 33(1), 133–148 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bulacu, M., Schomaker, L. Brink, A.: Text-independent writer identification and verification on offline Arabic handwriting. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, Z., You, X., Tang, Y.: Writer identification of Chinese handrwriting documents using hidden Markov tree model. Pattern Recogn. 41, 1295–1307 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Helli, B., Moghaddam, E.: A text-independent Persian writer identification based on feature relation graph (FRG). Pattern Recogn. 43, 2199–2209 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hanusiak, R.K., Oliveira, L.S., Justino, E., Sabourin, R.: Writer verification using texture-based features. Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recogn. 15, 213–226 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siddiqi, I., Vincent, N. Combining global and local features for writer identification. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, pp. 48–53 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zois, E., Anastassopoulos, V.: Morphological waveform coding for writer identification. Pattern Recogn. 33(3), 385–398 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hertel, C. Bunke, H.: A set of novel features for writer identification. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, pp. 679–687 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schlapbach, A., Bunke, H.: Off-line handwriting identification using HMM based recognizers. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Pattern Recognition – ICPR 2004, vol. 2 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pervouchine, V., Leedham, G.: Extraction and analysis of forensic document examiner features used for writer identification. Pattern Recogn. 40, 1004–1013 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen, J., Lopresti, D., Kavallieratou, E.: The impact of ruling lines on writer identification. In: 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freitas, C.O.A., Oliveira, L.S., Bortolozzi, F., Sabourin, R.: Brazilian forensic letter database. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Frontiers on Handwriting Recognition (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dy, J.G., Broadley, C.E.: Feature subset selection and order identification for unsupervised learning. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 247–254 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament of InformaticsState University of MaringáMaringáBrazil
  2. 2.Polytechnic SchoolPontifical Catholic University of ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  3. 3.Departament of InformaticsUniCesumarMaringáBrazil

Personalised recommendations