Use of Machine Learning to Improve the Robustness of Spatial Estimation of Evapotranspiration

  • David Fonseca-Luengo
  • Mario Lillo-Saavedra
  • L. O. Lagos
  • Angel García-Pedrero
  • Consuelo Gonzalo-Martín
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10657)


Estimation of the crop water requirement is critical in the optimization of the agricultural production process, due to that yield and costs are directly affected by this estimation. Nowadays, remote sensing is a useful tool for estimating Evapotranspiration (ET), since it is possible to map their spatial and temporal variability. ET models using satellite images have been developed in the last decades, using in most cases the surface energy balance which has generated good ET representation in different study sites. One of these models is METRIC (Mapping EvapoTranspiration at high Resolution using Internalized Calibration), which estimates ET using mainly data from Landsat 7 and 5 images, and a physical-empirical basis to solve the surface energy balance. The main drawback of the METRIC model is the low robustness in the selection of two parameters called anchor pixels. Even though the rules to select anchor pixels are standardized, the procedure requires a user to choose the area where these pixels will be selected. In this sense, ET estimation is highly sensible to this selection, producing important differences when different anchor pixels are selected. In this study, a machine learning method is implemented through the GEOBIA (Geographic Object Based Image Analysis) approach for the identification of anchor objects, changing the focus from the pixels to the objects. Image segmentation and classification processes are used for an adequate selection of anchor objects, considering spectral and contextual information. The main contribution of this work proves that it is not necessary to choose an area to select the anchor parameters, improving the numerical stability of the model METRIC and increasing the robustness of the ET estimation. Results were validated by comparing the original selection of anchor pixels, as well as in-situ ET estimation using data obtained from Surface Renewal Stations, in sugar beat crops.


Random Forest METRIC model GEOBIA approach 


  1. 1.
    Allen, R., Tasumi, M., Trezza, R.: Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC). Model. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 133(4), 380–394 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, R.G., Burnett, B., Kramber, W., Huntington, J., Kjaersgaard, J., Kilic, A., Kelly, C., Trezza, R.: Automated calibration of the metric-landsat evapotranspiration process. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 49(3), 563–576 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peña Barragan, J., Ngugi, M., Plant, R., Six, J.: Object-based crop identification using multiple vegetation indices, textural features and crop phenology. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 1301–1316 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bastiaanssen, W., Meneti, M., Feddes, R., Holtslag, A.: A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). Formulation. J. Hydrol. 212–213, 198–212 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choragudi, V.N.R.K.: Sensitivity analysis on mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution using internal calibration (METRIC). Civil Engineering Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. Paper 35 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corcoran, J., Knight, J., Pelletier, K., Rampi, L., Wang, Y.: The effects of point or polygon based training data on randomforest classification accuracy of wetlands. Remote Sens. 7(4), 4002–4025 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: A review on ensembles for the class imbalance problem: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based approaches. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 42(4), 463–484 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gowda, P., Chavez, J., Colaizzi, P., Evett, S., Howell, T., Tolk, J.: ET mapping for agricultural water management: present status and challenges. Irrig. Sci. 26(3), 223–237 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hay, G., Castilla, G.: Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): a new name for a new discipline. Object-Based Image Anal. 75–89 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prasad, A.M., Iverson, L.R., Liaw, A.: Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9(2), 181–199 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sexton, J.O., Urban, D.L., Donohue, M.J., Song, C.: Long-term land cover dynamics by multi-temporal classification across the Landsat-5 record. Remote Sens. Environ. 128, 246–258 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Storey, J., Scaramuzza, P., Schmidt, G., Barsi, J.: Landsat 7 scan line corrector-off gap filled product development. In: Pecora, vol. 16, pp. 23–27 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversidad Católica de TemucoTemucoChile
  2. 2.Faculty of Agricultural EngineeringUniversidad de ConcepciónChillánChile
  3. 3.Facultad de InformáticaUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations