Skip to main content

Improving Physics Education Through Different Immersive and Engaging Laboratory Setups

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL 2017)

Abstract

Virtual and remote laboratories have been shown as valuable tools to support learners in understanding concepts. They provide an experimentation space in a safe, remote, and flexible way. However, the missing realism and lack of hands-on experience are often pointed out as a downside. This can also be described as a missing feeling of immersion and presence. Emerging virtual reality tools providing full-body tracking and even force-feedback when interacting with experiments support this sense of immersion and engage focused learning. Collaborative virtual setups additional add features to enable engaging discussions and social experiences. In this paper, we investigate learning experiences within a virtual laboratory environment in a room-scale virtual reality setup, a traditional screen-based solution, and mobile VR settings supporting multi-user setups. In two experiments setup as A/B studies, we investigate and compare the settings with a focus on comparing immersion, engagement, usability, and learning experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://store.steampowered.com/steamvr.

References

  1. Bonde, M.T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M.V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., Sommer, M.O.: Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nat. Biotechnol. 32(7), 694–697 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockmyer, J.H., Fox, C.M., Curtiss, K.A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K.M., Pidruzny, J.N.: The development of the game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45(4), 624–634 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corter, J.E., Nickerson, J.V., Esche, S.K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., Ma, J.: Constructing reality: a study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 14(2), 7 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, I.: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992). https://books.google.at/books?id=lNt6bdfoyxQC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dori, Y.J., Hult, E., Breslow, L., Belcher, J.W.: How much have they retained? Making unseen concepts seen in a freshman electromagnetism course at MIT. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 16(4), 299–323 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. HTC: Vive user guide (2017). http://hdl4.htc.com/web_materials/Manual/Vive/Vive_User_Guide.pdf?_ga=2.82037588.318918390.1502103742-2091439008.1500636618

  7. Lindsay, E., Good, M.: Virtual and distance experiments: pedagogical alternatives, not logistical alternatives. In: American Society for Engineering Education, pp. 19–21 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lunce, L.M.: Simulations: bringing the benefits of situated learning to the traditional classroom. J. Appl. Educ. Technol. 3(1), 37–45 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olson, S., Riordan, D.G.: Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pirker, J., Gütl, C.: Educational gamified science simulations. In: Gamification in Education and Business, pp. 253–275. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pirker, J., Gütl, C., Belcher, J.W., Bailey, P.H.: Design and evaluation of a learner-centric immersive virtual learning environment for physics education. In: Human Factors in Computing and Informatics, pp. 551–561. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Settgast, V., Pirker, J., Lontschar, S., Maggale, S., Gütl, C.: Evaluating experiences in different virtual reality setups. In: International Conference on Entertainment Computing, pp. 115–125. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wieman, C., Perkins, K.: Transforming physics education. Phys. Today 58(11), 36 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank John Winston Belcher from the Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We thank all people who are and were involved in the development process. Details: gamelabgraz.com/maroon/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Pirker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, a part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pirker, J., Holly, M.S., Hipp, P., König, C., Jeitler, D., Gütl, C. (2018). Improving Physics Education Through Different Immersive and Engaging Laboratory Setups. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning. IMCL 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 725. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75174-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75175-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics