Skip to main content

Random Popular Matchings with Incomplete Preference Lists

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation (WALCOM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10755))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For a set A of n people and a set B of m items, with each person having a preference list that ranks some items in order of preference, we consider the problem of matching every person with a unique item. A matching M is popular if for any other matching \(M'\), the number of people who prefer M to \(M'\) is not less than the number of those who prefer \(M'\) to M. For given n and m, consider the probability of existence of a popular matching when each person’s preference list is independently and uniformly generated at random. Previously, Mahdian showed that when people’s preference lists are strict (containing no ties) and complete (containing all items in B), if \(\alpha = m/n > \alpha _*\), where \(\alpha _* \approx 1.42\) is the root of equation \(x^2 = e^{1/x}\), then a popular matching exists with probability \(1-o(1)\); and if \(\alpha < \alpha _*\), then a popular matching exists with probability o(1), i.e. a phase transition occurs at \(\alpha _*\). In this paper, we investigate phase transitions in more general cases when people’s preference lists are not complete. In particular, we show that in the case that each person has a preference list of length k, if \(\alpha > \alpha _k\), where \(\alpha _k \ge 1\) is the root of equation \(x e^{-1/2x} = 1-(1-e^{-1/x})^{k-1}\), then a popular matching exists with probability \(1-o(1)\); and if \(\alpha < \alpha _k\), then a popular matching exists with probability o(1).

A full version of the paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07288.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Sönmez, T.: Random serial dictatorship and the core from random endowments in house allocation problems. Econometrica 66(3), 689–701 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham, D.J., Cechlárová, K., Manlove, D.F., Mehlhorn, K.: Pareto optimality in house allocation problems. In: Fleischer, R., Trippen, G. (eds.) ISAAC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3341, pp. 3–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30551-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham, D.J., Irving, R.W., Kavitha, T., Mehlhorn, K.: Popular matchings. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 424–432 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biró, P., Irving, R.W., Manlove, D.F.: Popular matchings in the marriage and roommates problems. In: Calamoneri, T., Diaz, J. (eds.) CIAC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6078, pp. 97–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13073-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bollobás, B., Janson, S., Riordan, O.: The phase transition in inhomogeneous random graphs. Random Struct. Algorithms 31(1), 3–122 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gärdenfors, P.: Match making: assignments based on bilateral preferences. Behav. Sci. 20, 166–173 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, C.-C., Kavitha, T., Michail, D., Nasre, M.: Bounded unpopularity matchings. In: Gudmundsson, J. (ed.) SWAT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5124, pp. 127–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69903-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hylland, A., Zeckhauser, R.: The efficient allocation of individuals to positions. J. Polit. Econ. 87(22), 293–314 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Irving, R.W., Kavitha, T., Mehlhorn, K., Michail, D., Paluch, K.: Rank-maximal matchings. ACM Trans. Algorithms 2(4), 602–610 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Itoh, T., Watanabe, O.: Weighted random popular matchings. Random Struct. Algorithms 37(4), 477–494 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kavitha, T., Mestre, J., Nasre, M.: Popular mixed matchings. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5555, pp. 574–584. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02927-1_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahdian, M.: Random popular matchings. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), pp. 238–242 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manlove, D., Sng, C.T.S.: Popular matchings in the weighted capacitated house allocation problem. J. Discrete Algorithms 8(2), 102–116 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. McCutchen, R.M.: The least-unpopularity-factor and least-unpopularity-margin criteria for matching problems with one-sided preferences. In: Laber, E.S., Bornstein, C., Nogueira, L.T., Faria, L. (eds.) LATIN 2008. LNCS, vol. 4957, pp. 593–604. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78773-0_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mestre, J.: Weighted popular matchings. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 715–726. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Roth, A.E., Postlewaite, A.: Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. J. Math. Econ. 4, 131–137 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Söderberg, B.: General formalism for inhomogeneous random graphs. Phys. Rev. E 66(6), 066121 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuan, Y.: Residence exchange wanted: a stable residence exchange problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 90, 536–546 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suthee Ruangwises .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ruangwises, S., Itoh, T. (2018). Random Popular Matchings with Incomplete Preference Lists. In: Rahman, M., Sung, WK., Uehara, R. (eds) WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation. WALCOM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75172-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75172-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75171-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75172-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics