Introduction: Ethics and Physics in Contemporary Plays

  • Jenni G. Halpin
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

The introductory chapter establishes the relationships among science, science drama, and the history of science through which the arguments of the ensuing chapters will proceed. I argue that recent physics plays make a return to the metaphysical concerns of the early-twentieth-century physicists who were developing quantum theory and relativity. Moreover, they do so while engaging in what Kirsten Shepherd-Barr has characterized as enaction of the science they discuss: producing dramatic forms that manifest scientific content. A concern throughout is the manner in which these enactions alter the ethical stakes for the characters’ decisions.

Keywords

Science play Cold war Ethics 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Brecht, Bertolt. Life of Galileo. Bertolt Brecht: Collected Plays. Eds. Ralph Manheim and John Willett. Vol. 5. New York: Vintage, 1972. 1–98.Google Scholar
  2. Büchner, Georg. Woyzeck. Georg Büchner: Complete Plays, Lenz and Other Writings. Trans. John Reddick. New York: Penguin, 1993. 109–138.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, Elizabeth M. The Fortunes of Faust. Magic in History 4. Cambridge: Cambridge U P, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, Charles A. Dramas of the Nuclear Age—A Descriptive List of English-Language Plays. Studies in Comparative Literature. Vol. 29. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, Frederic I. “Herman Wouk and the Wisdom of Disillusion.” The English Journal 45.1 (1956): 1–6, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Andrea, Paul and John Klein. The Einstein Project. New York: Dramatists Play Service, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, Jacques. “Force of Law: ‘The Mystical Foundation of Authority’.” Trans. Mary Quaintance. Acts of Religion. Ed. Gil Anidjar. New York and London: Routledge, 2002. 230–98.Google Scholar
  8. Dietz, Steven. Foolin’ Around with Infinity. New York: Samuel French, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Dürrenmatt, Friedrich. The Physicists. Trans. James Kirkup. New York: Grove Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  10. Einstein, Albert. “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” The Principle of Relativity. 37–65.Google Scholar
  11. Frayn, Michael. Copenhagen. New York: Anchor, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Haynes, Roslynn D. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Ibsen, Henrik. An Enemy of the People. Four Great Plays by Henrik Ibsen. Trans. R. Farquharson Sharp. Toronto: Bantam, 1981. 129–215.Google Scholar
  14. Kipphardt, Heinar. In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer: A Play Freely Adapted on the Basis of the Documents by Heinar Kipphardt. Trans. Ruth Speirs. New York: Hill and Wang, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. Kuznick, Peter J., and James Gilbert. “U.S. Culture and the Cold War.” Rethinking Cold War Culture. Eds. Peter J. Kuznick and James Gilbert. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2001. 1–13.Google Scholar
  16. Leane, Elizabeth. Reading Popular Physics: Disciplinary Skirmishes and Textual Strategies. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Lowe, Stephen. Introduction. Peace Plays. London and New York: Methuen, 1985. v–vii.Google Scholar
  18. MacColl, Ewan. Uranium 235. Glasgow: William MacLellan, 1952.Google Scholar
  19. Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus. Doctor Faustus with The English Faust Book. Ed. David Wootton. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 2005. 1–66.Google Scholar
  20. Minkowski, Hermann. “Space and Time.” The Principle of Relativity. 73–91.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, Charles. The Burning Glass: A Play. New York: St. Martin’s P, 1953.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, Elaine. Licence to Murder. London: Samuel French, 1963.Google Scholar
  23. Penniston, Penny. Now Then Again. New York: Broadway Play Pub., 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Plotnitsky, Arkady. Complementarity: Anti-Epistemology After Bohr and Derrida. Durham and London: Duke UP, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity: By H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski and H. Weyl. Trans. W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery. Rpt. Ed. Methuen: 1923. Trans. of Das Relativitatsprinzip. 4th ed. Teubner, 1922. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar
  26. Ridenour “Pilot Lights of the Apocalypse.” Fortune 33 (January 1946), 116–7, 219.Google Scholar
  27. Scarry, Elaine. Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom. New York and London: Norton, 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Schrödinger, Erwin. “Die Gegenwärtige Situation in Der Quantenmechanik.” Naturwissenschaften 23.48 (1935): 807–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. Science on Stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton U P, 2006.Google Scholar
  30. Stoppard, Tom. Arcadia. London and Boston: Faber and Faber, 1999a.Google Scholar
  31. Stoppard, Tom. Hapgood. Tom Stoppard: Plays Five. London: Faber and Faber, 1999b. 483–593.Google Scholar
  32. von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Faust. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Doubleday, 1963.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, Martin. The Cold War: A History. New York: Holt, 1995.Google Scholar
  34. Wouk, Herman. The Traitor. New York: Samuel French, 1949.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenni G. Halpin
    • 1
  1. 1.Savannah State UniversitySavannahUSA

Personalised recommendations