Skip to main content

Motivation for the Finite Element Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover One-Dimensional Finite Elements
  • 1785 Accesses

Abstract

The approach to the finite element method can be derived from different motivations. Essentially there are three ways:

  • a rather descriptive way, which has its roots in the engineering working method,

  • a physical or

  • mathematically motivated approach.

Depending on the perspective, different initial formulations result in the same principal finite element equation. The different formulations will be elaborated in detail based on the following descriptions:

  • matrix methods,

  • energy methods and

  • weighted residual method.

The finite element method is used to solve different physical problems. Here solely finite element formulations related to structural mechanics are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The additional index ‘e’ is to be dropped at displacements since the nodal displacement is identical for each linked element in the displacement method.

  2. 2.

    In the one-dimensional case, the differential operator simplifies to the first-order derivative \(\tfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}\).

  3. 3.

    The index ‘e’ of the element coordinate is neglected in the following — in the case it does not affect the understanding.

  4. 4.

    Since the static boundary conditions are implicitly integrated in the overall potential, the shape functions do not have to fulfill those. However, if the shape functions fulfill the static boundary conditions additionally, an even more precise approximation can be achieved.

  5. 5.

    Usually a separate local coordinate system \(0 \le x^\text {e} \le L^\text {e}\) is introduced for each element ‘e’. The coordinate in Eq. (2.88) is then referred to as global coordinate and receives the symbol X.

References

  1. Kuhn G, Winter W(1993) Skriptum Festigkeitslehre Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brebbia CA, Telles JCF, Wrobel LC (1984) Boundary element techniques: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method volume 1: the basis. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Öchsner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Öchsner, A., Merkel, M. (2018). Motivation for the Finite Element Method. In: One-Dimensional Finite Elements. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75145-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75145-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75144-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75145-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics