Skip to main content

Reconsidering the EDUCO Program and the Influence of Its Impact Evaluations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 327 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter accomplishes two tasks. First, it reevaluates what is known about the Education with Community Participation (EDUCO) program in light of the critical review provided in Chap. 5. Second, it reconsiders the influence of the impact evaluations of EDUCO in terms of national and international implications. Not only did these studies provide justification for scaling up EDUCO within El Salvador, but, internationally, they changed how international organizations and development professionals thought about decentralization and provided a basis from which these organizations and individuals could promote an extreme form of community-based management (one where parents are responsible for hiring and firing teachers, among other things). Crucially, it is also shown that, due to the knowledge base that has been created by the World Bank in the form of impact evaluations, EDUCO has taken on a life of its own and continues to live on in the literature on decentralization as well as school- and community-based management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For additional detail and critique of EDUCO in practice at the community level, see Edwards (forthcoming).

  2. 2.

    Indeed, EDUCO is concerning because of the burden that it can impose, considering that the labor contributed by parents was equivalent to work of 805 full-time staff (an amount that equals 28% of the work done by the administrative staff of the Ministry of Education) (Cuéllar-Marchelli, 2003).

  3. 3.

    Alec Gershberg served as a senior education economist for the World Bank during the late 1990s.

  4. 4.

    These three ministers were Abigail de Perez (minister during 1998–1999, formerly vice-minister and director of Planning for the MINED), Evelyn Jacir de Lovo (Minister during 1999–2003, formerly director of the Modernization Unit within the MINED, later working for the Organization of American States as the director of the Departamento de Desarrollo Social y Empleo), and Darlyn Meza (minister during 2004–2009, formerly vice-minister, director of Education, and coordinator of the EDUCO office). Only Rolando Marin, who briefly served served as minister during 2004, did not have a previous association with the EDUCO reform.

  5. 5.

    See Chap. 1 for more on EDUCO’s background. For more on EDUCO’s undoing, see Edwards (2018) or Edwards, Martin, and Flores (forthcoming).

References

  • ADES. (Asociación de Desarrollo Económico Social, Santa Marta). (2005). Una sistematización de la educación popular en el cantón Santa Marta, Cabañas, El Salvador, 1978–2001. [A systematization of popular education in the canton of Santa Marta, Cabañas, El Salvador, 1978–2001.]. San Salvador, El Salvador: ADES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar, R., Becera, L., Burgos, J., Castro, J., & García, A. (1993). La educación popular en Chalatenango: Un diagnóstico. [Popular education in Chalatenango: A diagnostic.]. San Salvador: CIDEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvear Galindo, V. (2002). La educación en Morazán, El Salvador, durante la guerra civil de 1981 a 1992: ¿parte de una estrategia de supervivencia? [Education in Morazán, El Salvador, during the civil war from 1981 to 1992: Part of a strategy for survival?] Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Berlin: Berlin Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Osorio, F., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H., & Santibánez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools: The theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beleli, O., Chang, V., Fegelson, M., Kopel-Bailey, J., Maak, S., Mnookin, J., Nguyen, T., Salazar, M., Sinderbrand, J., & Tafoya, S. (2007). Education in emergencies and early reconstruction: UNICEF interventions in Colombia, Liberia, and Southern Sudan. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N., Levine, R., & Ibrahim, A. (2005). Toward universal primary education: Investments, incentives, and institutions. UN Millennium Project, Task Force on Education and Gender Equality. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability Reforms. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cuéllar-Marchelli, H. (2003). Decentralization and privatization of education in El Salvador: Assessing the experience. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(2), 45–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gropello, E. (2006). A Comparative analysis of school-based management in Central America. World Bank Working Paper 72. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gropello, E. (2007). Education decentralisation and accountability relationships in Latin American and the Caribbean region. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 503–522). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (forthcoming). Accountability through community-based management? Implications from the local level implementation in El Salvador of a globally-popular model. In K. A. Heidemann & R. A. Clothey (Eds.), Another Way: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Global Politics of Community-Based Schooling. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2018). The trajectory of global education policy: Community-based management in El Salvador and the global reform agenda. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr., & Ávalos, E. (2015). Santa Marta y el programa EDUCO: Una experiencia de resistencia, adaptación e inversión de la lógica neoliberal. [Santa Marta and the EDUCO Program: An experience of resistance, adaptation and inversion of neoliberal reform logic.]. San Salvador, El Salvador: Universidad Centroamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr., & DeMatthews, D. (2014). Historical trends in educational decentralization in the United States and developing countries: A periodization and comparison in the post-WWII context. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(40), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n40.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr., & Klees, S. (2012). Participation in international development and education governance. In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. Kosar-Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and programmes (pp. 55–77). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr., & Klees, S. (2015). Unpacking “participation” in development and education governance: A framework of perspectives and practices. Prospects, 45(4), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. B., Jr., Martin, P., & Flores, I. (forthcoming). Education in El Salvador: Past, present, and prospects. In C. M. Posner, C. Martin, & Y. Martin (Eds.), Education in México, Central America and the Latin Caribbean. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershberg, A. I., Meade, B., & Andersson, S. (2009). Providing better education services to the poor: Accountability and context in the case of Guatemalan decentralization. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, J. (Ed.). (2010). Education system reform and aid effectiveness: The power of persistence. Washington, DC: USAID/Equip 2. Retrieved from http://www.equip123.net/docs/E2-Power_of_Persistence.pdf

  • Global Partnership for Education. (2009). Six steps for abolishing primary school fees: Operational guide. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, A., & Linn, J. (2008). Scaling up: A framework and lessons for development effectiveness from literature and practice. Brookings Global Economy and Development Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2008/10/scaling-up-aid-linn/10_scaling_up_aid:linn.pdf

  • Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (1999). Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majgaard, K., & Mingat, A. (2012). Education in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meza, D., Guzmán, J., & de Varela, L. (2004, May 25–27). EDUCO: A community-managed education program in rural areas of El Salvador. Paper presented at Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, T. (1995). Revolution in El Salvador: From civil strife to civil peace (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najjumba, I., Habyarimana, J., & Bunjo, C. (2013). Improving learning in Uganda Vol. III: School-based management: Policy and functionality. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patrinos, H., Barrera-Osorio, F., & Guáqueta, J. (2009). The role and impact of public-private partnerships in education. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, F. (1997). The role of the community in expanding educational opportunities: The EDUCO schools in El Salvador. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Education and development: Tradition and innovation. Equity and excellence in education for development (Vol. 2, pp. 146–162). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children. (2013). The right to learn: Community participation improving learning. Westport, CN: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada, Y. (2000). Community participation, teacher effort, and educational outcome: The case of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. Michigan: The William Davidson Institute, Report No. 307, University of Michigan Business School. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/39691

  • Sawada, Y., Kozuka, E., Aida, T., Griffen, D., Noguchi, H., & Todo, Y. (2014). Do community-managed schools facilitate social capital accumulation? Evidence from COGES project in Burkina Faso. Retrieved from http://www.3ieimpact.org/media/filer_public/2014/09/18/do_community_managed_schools_facilities_social_capital_accumulation_sawada.pdf

  • Shibuya, K. (2013). Challenges in educational development in Africa and JICA’s approach. In JICA, For inclusive and dynamic development in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 267–298). Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umansky, I., & Vegas, E. (2007). Inside decentralization: How three Central American school-based management reforms affect student learning through teacher incentives. The World Bank Research Observer, 22(2), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umanzor, S., Soriano, I., Vega, M., Jimenez, E., Rawlings, L., & Steele, D. (1997). El Salvador’s EDUCO program: A first report on parents’ participation in school-based management. Working Paper Series on Impact Evaluation of Education Reforms, No. 4. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (n.d.). EDUCO: Educación con participación de la comunidad. [EDUCO: Education with community participation.] Innovemos: Education Innovations Network for Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from http://www.redinnovemos.org/content/view/189/92/lang,en/

  • UNESCO. (2007). Educational governance at the local level. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2008). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2009: Overcoming inequality: Why governance matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2011). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2011: The hidden crisis: Armed conflict and education. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2003). World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Edwards, D.B. (2018). Reconsidering the EDUCO Program and the Influence of Its Impact Evaluations. In: Global Education Policy, Impact Evaluations, and Alternatives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75142-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics