Skip to main content

Non-orographic Gravity Waves: Representation in Climate Models and Effects on Infrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies

Abstract

Long-range infrasound propagation is controlled by atmospheric waveguides that extend up to the mesosphere and lower thermosphere and whose efficiency is affected by gravity waves (GWs). These GWs are not explicitly represented in the global models often used to calculate infrasound propagation because their spatial scales are well below the models’ resolution. These unresolved GWs also transport momentum and control in good part the large-scale circulation in the middle atmosphere. These two issues make that the GWs need to be parameterized to improve the datasets used to calculate infrasound propagation as well as in the atmospheric general circulation model (AGCMs) that are used to make weather forecasts and climate predictions. These two issues gain in being treated in conjunction. From this, improved infrasound calculations could be made by using a realistic amount of GWs. In return, using infrasound records could help specifying important characteristics of the GWs that are parameterized in the climate models. The paper presents a research framework developed to address these issues. It first presents a non-orographic GWs parameterization used and tested in a well-established AGCM, emphasizing the most recent developments, like the introduction of stochastic techniques and a better specification of the GWs sources. The significance of GWs on the global climate is then illustrated by making sensitivity tests where the frontal and convective GWs parameters are moderately changed. These changes impact the structure of the jets in the midlatitude stratosphere and the intensity of the sudden stratospheric warmings. The paper also presents a method to calculate long-range infrasound propagation, and to incorporate the contribution of the GWs that are parameterized in the AGCM. We then show that the changes in GW parameters tested in the model also impact infrasound propagation. This makes infrasound detection a potential tool to tune GWs parameterization in large-scale models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander MJ, Dunkerton TJ (1999) A spectral parameterization of mean-flow forcing due to breaking gravity waves. J Atmos Sci 56(24):4167–4182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beres JH, Garcia RR, Boville BA, Sassi F (2005) Implementation of a gravity wave source spectrum parameterization dependent on the properties of convection in the whole atmosphere community climate model (waccm). J Geophys Res 110(10):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin M, Millet C, Bouche D (2014) A low-order reduced model for the long range propagation of infrasounds in the atmosphere. J Acoust Soc Am 136(1):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budden KF (1961) The wave-guide mode theory of wave propagation. Logos Press and Elek Book

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunchuzov I, Kulichkov S (2019) Internal gravity wave perturbations and their impacts on infrasound propagation in the atmosphere. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies. 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht pp 551–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunchuzov IP, Kulichkov SN, Popov OE, Waxler R, Assink J (2011) Infrasound scattering from atmospheric anisotropic inhomogeneities. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys 47(5):540–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Camara A, Lott F (2015) A parameterization of gravity waves emitted by fronts and jets. Geophys Res Lett 42:2071–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Camara A, Lott F, Hertzog H (2014) Intermittency in a stochastic parameterization of non-orographic gravity waves. J Geophys Res Atmos 119:11905–11919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dergham G, Millet C (2013) Range-dependent propagation modeling of infrasound in complex atmospheres. AIAA Paper 2013-3209

    Google Scholar 

  • Drob DP et al (2008) An empirical model of the Earth’s horizontal wind fields: HWM07. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 113:2156–2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drob DP, Broutman D, Hedlin MA, Winslow NW, Gibson RG (2013) A method for specifying atmospheric gravity wavefields for long-range infrasound propagation calculations. J Geophys Res 118(10):3933–3943

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckermann SD (2011) Explicitly stochastic parameterization of nonorographic gravity wave drag. J Atmos Sci 68(8):1749–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons SJ et al (2015) The European Arctic: a laboratory for seismoacoustic studies. Seismmol Res Lett 86(3):917–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin OA (2002) An effective quiescent medium for sound propagating through an inhomogeneous moving fluid. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1269–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossard EE, Hooke WH (1975) Waves in the atmosphere. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlin MA, de Groot-Hedlin CD, Drob D (2012) A study of infrasound propagation using dense seismic network recordings of surface explosions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1927–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlin MAH, Drob DP (2014) Statistical characterization of atmospheric gravity waves by seismoacoustic observations. J Geophys Res: Atmos 119(9):5345–5363

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton JR (1982) The role of gravity wave induced drag and diffusion in the momentum budget of the mesosphere. J Atmos Sci 39:791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourdin F et al (2013) Impact of the lmdz atmospheric grid configuration on the climate and sensitivity of the ipsl-cm5a coupled model. Clim Dyn 40:2167–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen FB, Kuperman WA, Porter MB, Schmidt H (1994) Computational ocean acoustics. American Institute of Physics

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulichkov SN, Chunchuzov IP, Popov OI (2010) Simulating the influence of an atmospheric fine inhomogeneous structure on long-range propagation of pulsed acoustic signals. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys 46(1):60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalande J-M, Waxler R (2016) The interaction between infrasonic waves and gravity wave perturbations: application to observations using UTTR rocket motor fuel elimination events. J Geophys Res: Atmos 121(10):5585–5600

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzen RS, Tsay CY (1975) Wave structure of the tropical stratosphere over the Marshall Island area during 1 April–1 July 1958. J Atmos Sci 32(10):2008–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott F (1999) Alleviation of stationary biases in a GCM through a mountain drag parameterization scheme and a simple representation of mountain lift forces. Monthly Weather Rev 127(5):788–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott F, Guez L (2013) A stochastic parameterization of the gravity waves due to convection and its impact on the equatorial stratosphere. J Geophys Res 118(16)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott F, Millet C (2009) The representation of gravity waves in atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs). Springer Netherlands, pp 685-699

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott F, Plougonven R, Vanneste J (2010) Gravity waves generated by potential vorticity anomalies. J Atmos Sci 67:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott F, Guez L, Maury P (2012a) A stochastic parameterization of non-orographic gravity waves: formalism and impact on the equatorial stratosphere. Geophys Res Lett 39(6)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott F, Plougonven R, Vanneste J (2012b) Gravity waves generated by sheared three-dimensional potential vorticity anomalies. J Atmos Sci 69(7):2134–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TN (2012) Towards the probabilistic earth-system simulator: a vision for the future of climate and weather prediction. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picone JM, Hedlin A, Drob D, Aikin A (2002) NRL MSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: statistical comparisons and scientific issues. J Geophys Res 107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rind DH (1978) Investigation of the lower thermosphere results of ten years of continuous observations with natural infrasound. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 40:1199–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Commission’s project ARISE2 (Grant Agreement 653980), the ANR/JPI-Climate/Belmont Forum project GOTHAM (ANR-15-JCLI-0004-01), and the Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to François Lott or Christophe Millet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cugnet, D., de la Camara, A., Lott, F., Millet, C., Ribstein, B. (2019). Non-orographic Gravity Waves: Representation in Climate Models and Effects on Infrasound. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A. (eds) Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75140-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics