Against Medical Advice Discharges from the Emergency Department

Chapter

Abstract

The emergency department (ED) presents a unique context for patients leaving the acute care setting against medical advice (AMA). We review three common cases, establish definitions, discuss the peer-reviewed literature, debunk the myths and common practices, cover the law and the effect of technology, and finally return to the clinical scenarios to make concrete recommendations for handling patients requesting to leave the ED prior to completion of their episode of care. The advice contained within this chapter will help a practitioner of emergency medicine capably navigate the sometimes murky waters of balancing and accommodating a patient’s request and defending a professional’s responsibilities to the health-care system. It will also serve the wider health-care community to gain insight into the complex environment of health-care delivery in the ED that only gets trickier when patients request to leave.

Keywords

AMA ED EMTALA Refusal of treatment LWBT LWBS LWBD Patient-centered Decision-making capacity AIMED 

Notes

Acknowledgments

With acknowledgment to Rishana Cohen, MD, and Michal Poplawski, MD.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark MA, Abbott JT, Adyanthaya T. Ethics seminars: a best-practice approach to navigating the against-medical-advice discharge. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(9):1050–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK, Krishnan E. Factors associated with patients who leave acute-care hospitals against medical advice. Am J Public Health. 2007;12(97):2204–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jerrard DA, Chasm RM. Patients leaving against medical advice (AMA) from the emergency department – disease prevalence and willingness to return. J Emerg Med. 2009;41(4):412–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pham JC, Ho GK, Hill PM, McCarthy ML, Pronovost PJ. National study of patient, visit, and hospital characteristics associated with leaving an emergency department without being seen: predicting LWBS. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(10):949–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polevoi SK, Quinn JV, Kramer NR. Factors associated with patients who leave without being seen. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(3):232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinke DA, Walker M, Boslaugh S, Hodge D. Predictors of pediatric emergency patients discharged against medical advice. Clin Pediatr. 2009;48(3):263–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun BC, Binstadt ES, Pelletier A, Camargo CA. Characteristics and temporal trends of “left without being seen” visits in US emergency departments, 1995–2002. J Emerg Med. 2006;32(2):211–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tothy AS, Staley S, Dean EK, Johnson S, Johnson D. Pediatric left-without-being-seen patients: what happens to them after they leave the pediatric emergency department? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(11):1194–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson BJ, Zimmerman D, Applebaum KG, Kovalski N, Stein C. Patients who leave before being seen in an urgent care setting. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013;20(6):420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wigder HN, Leslie K, Mathew A. Insurance companies refusing payment for patients who leave the emergency department against medical advice is a myth. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(4):393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levy F, Mareiniss DP, Iacovelli C. The importance of a proper against-medical-advice (AMA) discharge: how signing out AMA may create significant liability protection for providers. J Emerg Med. 2010;43(3):516–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stearns CR, Bakamijan A, Sattar S, Ritterman Weintraub M. Discharges against medical advice at a county hospital: provider perceptions and practice. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(1):11–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sullivan W. Special report: AMA discharges. ED Leg Lett. 2007;18(6):66–8.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Welsh S, Kauer K, Fontenot SF. Risk management and the emergency department. ACEP; 2011. http://www.acep.org/News-Media-top-banner/EMTALA. Accessed Feb 2017.
  15. 15.
    EMTALA Q & A. Emergency Department Management. 2003. https://www.ahcmedia.com/articles/print/22468-emtala-q-a.
  16. 16.
    Brenner J, Joslin J, Goulette A, Wojcik S, Grant W. Against medical advice: a survey of ED clinicians’ rationale for use. J Emerg Nurs. 2016;42(5):408–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Furukawa MF. Electronic medical records and the efficiency of hospital emergency departments. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(1):75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hansson J, Körner U, Ludwigs K, Johnsson E, Jönsson C, Lundholm K. Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice. World J Surg. 2012;36(9):2028–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(23):2340–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Emergency MedicineUpstate Medical UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Elson S. Floyd College of MedicineWashington State UniversityEverettUSA
  3. 3.Emergency DepartmentProvidence Regional Medical CenterEverettUSA
  4. 4.North Sound Emergency MedicineEverettUSA

Personalised recommendations