Ethical Considerations in Against Medical Advice Discharges: Value Conflicts Over Patient Autonomy and Best Interests

Chapter

Abstract

Patients who wish to leave the hospital against medical advice (AMA) present physicians with a common but challenging ethical dilemma. Physicians are obligated to respect patient’s autonomy when patients choose treatment consistent with their values, needs, and preferences. However, physicians also have a fiduciary obligation to promote the patient’s best interest by recommending medically appropriate care. This chapter will provide guidance in managing this ethical dilemma by reviewing the construct of medical advice giving, examining the central role of power in that process, describing the process of shared decision-making and how it promotes strong ethics practices in informed consent, and exploring the role of surrogates in the AMA process.

Keywords

Against medical advice Ethics Power Shared decision-making Informed consent Autonomy Best interests 

Suggested Reading

  1. 1.
    Alfandre D. Reconsidering against medical advice discharges: embracing patient-centeredness to promote high quality care and a renewed research agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(12):1657–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2540-z. Epub 2013 JulCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfandre D. Clinical recommendations in medical practice – a proposed framework for reducing bias and improving decision quality. J Clin Ethics. 2016;27(1):21–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 137–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger JT. Discharge against medical advice: ethical considerations and professional obligations. J Hosp Med. 2008;3(5):403–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berger JT, DeRenzo EG, Schwartz J. Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brody H. The healer’s power. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fischer MA, Stedman MR, Lii J, Vogeli C, Shrank WH, Brookhart MA, Weissman JS. Primary medication non-adherence: analysis of 195,930 electronic prescriptions. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(4):284–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lekas HM, Alfandre D, Gordon P, Harwood K, Yin MT. The role of patient-provider interactions: using an accounts framework to explain hospital discharges against medical advice. Soc Sci Med. 2016;156:106–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tollen WB. Irregular discharge: the problem of hospitalization of the tuberculous. Public Health Rep. 1948;63(45):1441–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Windish DM, Ratanawongsa N. Providers’ perceptions of relationships and professional roles when caring for patients who leave the hospital against medical advice. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Palliative Medicine and Bioethics, Department of MedicineNYU Winthrop HospitalMineolaUSA
  2. 2.VHA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Department of Veterans AffairsNYU School of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations