Skip to main content

Functional Evaluation of the Subjects with Skeletal Alterations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Approach to Osteoporosis

Abstract

The appropriate management of osteoporotic patients, with or without fragility fracture, should include a comprehensive functional evaluation in order to define the alterations in functioning of the various organs and systems involved in the pathological process and its complications. The functional evaluation has to follow to an accurate anamnesis and inspection of the patient and should collect information on the range of motion of the joints, on muscle mass, strength, and power, and on balance, disability, and pain. An assessment of the Health Related Quality of Life is also mandatory as its improvement should be the major goal of any treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (official records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning disability, and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005;14(5):1225–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antonelli-Incalzi R, Pedone C, Cesari M, Di Iorio A, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L. Relationship between the occiput-wall distance and physical performance in the elderly: a cross sectional study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007;19:207–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Balzini L, Vannucchi L, Benvenuti F, Benucci M, Monni M, Cappozzo A, et al. Clinical characteristics of flexed posture in elderly women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1419–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Siminoski K, Warshawski RS, Jen H, Lee KC. The accuracy of clinical kyphosis examination for detection of thoracic vertebral fractures: comparison of direct and indirect kyphosis measures. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2011;11(3):249–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Siminoski K, Warshawski RS, Jen H, Lee KC. Accuracy of physical examination using the rib-pelvis distance for detection of lumbar vertebral fractures. Am J Med. 2003;115(3):233–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, et al. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cifu DX. Braddom’s physical medicine and rehabilitation. 5th ed; 2016. ISBN: 978-0-323-28046-4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hars M, Biver E, Chevalley T, Herrmann F, Rizzoli R, Ferrari S, Trombetti A. Low lean mass predicts incident fractures independently from FRAX: a prospective cohort study of recent retirees. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(11):2048–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2878. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark BC, Manini TM. Sarcopenia ≠ Dynapenia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(8):829–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark BC, Manini TM. Functional consequences of sarcopenia and dynapenia in the elderly. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13(3):271–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Huo YR, Suriyaarachchi P, Gomez F, Curcio CL, Boersma D, Muir SW, Montero-Odasso M, Gunawardene P, Demontiero O, Duque G. Phenotype of osteosarcopenia in older individuals with a history of falling. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(4):290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Fragala MS, Kenny AM, Kiel DP, Kritchevsky SB, Shardell MD, Dam TT, Vassileva MT. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(5):547–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper C, Fielding R, Visser M, van Loon LJ, Rolland Y, Orwoll E, Reid K, Boonen S, Dere W, Epstein S, Mitlak B, Tsouderos Y, Sayer AA, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Kanis JA. Tools in assessment of sarcopenia. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93(3):201–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinková E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW. Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther. 1996;76(3):248–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassey EJ, Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EF, Kelley M, Lipsitz LA, Evans WJ. Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci. 1992;82:321–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Foldvari M, Clark M, Laviolette LC, Bernstein MA, Kaliton D, Castaneda C, Pu CT, Hausdorff JM, Fielding RA, Singh MA. Association of muscle power with functional status in community-dwelling elderly women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(4):M192–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsianos GI, Evangelou E, Boot A, Zillikens MC, van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, Ioannidis JP. Associations of polymorphisms of eight muscle- or metabolism-related genes with performance in Mount Olympus marathon runners. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:567–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohannon RW. Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders. Percept Mot Skills. 2006;103(1):215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Buatois S, Perret-Guillaume C, Gueguen R, Miget P, Vançon G, Perrin P, Benetos A. A simple clinical scale to stratify risk of recurrent falls in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older. Phys Ther. 2010;90(4):550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corrigan D, Bohannon RW. Relationship between knee extension force and stand-up performance in community-dwelling elderly women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(12):1666–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bean JF, Kiely DK, LaRose S, Alian J, Frontera WR. Is stair climb power a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments in at-risk older adults? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(5):604–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(4):M221–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ostir GV, Volpato S, Fried LP, Chaves P, Guralnik JM. Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: results from the Women's health and aging study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:916–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmed T, Vafaei A, Auais M, Guralnik J, Zunzunegui MV. Gender roles and physical function in older adults: cross-sectional analysis of the international mobility in aging study (IMIAS). PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0156828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Keeler E, Guralnik JM, Tian H, Wallace RB, Reuben DB. The impact of functional status on life expectancy in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(7):727–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(2):239–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Iolascon G, Gravina P, Luciano F, Palladino C, Gimigliano F. Characteristics and circumstances of falls in hip fractures. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013;25(Suppl 1):S133–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. World Health Organization. Global report on falls prevention in older age. Geneva: WHO; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Close JCT. Falls in older people: risk factors, assessment and intervention. IBMS BoneKey. 2009;6(10):368–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:119–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hurvitz EA, Richardson JK, Werner RA, Ruhl AM, Dixon MR. Unipedal stance testing as an indicator of fall risk among older outpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(5):587–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Springer BA, Marin R, Cyhan T, Roberts H, Gill NW. Normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007;30(1):8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990;45(6):M192–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout R, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S101–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):127–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Noelker LS, Browdie R. Sidney Katz, MD: a new paradigm for chronic illness and long-term care. Gerontologist. 2014;54(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt086. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Graf C. The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale. Medsurg Nurs. 2009;18(5):315–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin CD, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Ghilardi JR, Mantyh PW. Organization of a unique net-like meshwork of CGRP+ sensory fibers in the mouse periosteum: implications for the generation and maintenance of bone fracture pain. Neurosci Lett. 2007;427(3):148–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Iolascon G, Gimigliano F, Moretti A, Bianco M, Cannaviello G, Gimigliano R. Dolore e osteoporosi. In: Saggini R, Buoso S, Pestelli G, editors. Dolore e riabilitazione; 2014. p. 187–202. ISBN: 9788877118134.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(7):798–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(1):17–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(3):277–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin brief pain questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983;17:197–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994;23(2):129–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Iolascon G, Gimigliano F, Gison A, et al. Validazione di un nuovo score di disabilita` da lombalgia: lo Spine Pain Index. Europa Medicophysica. 2003;39(suppl 1):600–3.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bowling A. Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Janssen MF, Birnie E, Haagsma JA, Bonsel GJ. Comparing the standard EQ–5D three level system with a five level version. Value Health. 2008;11:275–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iolascon, G., de Sire, A., Paoletta, M., Moretti, A., Gimigliano, F. (2018). Functional Evaluation of the Subjects with Skeletal Alterations. In: Lenzi, A., Migliaccio, S. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approach to Osteoporosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75110-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75110-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75108-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75110-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics