Skip to main content

Biases in Group Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Group Recommender Systems

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

  • 2088 Accesses

Abstract

Decision biases can be interpreted as tendencies to think and act in specific ways that result in a systematic deviation of potentially rational and high-quality decisions. In this chapter, we provide an overview of example decision biases and show possibilities to counteract these. The overview includes (1) biases that exist in both single user and group decision making (decoy effects, serial position effects, framing, and anchoring) and (2) biases that especially occur in the context of group decision making (GroupThink, polarization, and emotional contagion).

Alexander Felfernig, Müslüm Atas, Martin Stettinger,Thi Ngoc Trang Tran, and Gerhard Leitner

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the ACM RecSys Workshop Series on Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius, J. Bockstedt, S. Curley, J. Zhang, Recommender systems, consumer preferences, and anchoring effects, in RecSys 2011 Workshop on Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems (2011), pp. 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Amoo, H. Friedman, Do numeric values influence subjects responses to rating scales? J. Int. Mark. Mark. Res. 26, 41–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Arnott, A taxonomy of decision biases. Technical Report, Monash University, Caulfield East, VIC (1998), pp. 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Asch, Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements, in Groups, Leadership, and Men (1951), Swarthmore College, pp. 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Atas, A. Felfernig, M. Stettinger, T.N. Trang Tran, Beyond item recommendation: using recommendations to stimulate knowledge sharing in group decisions, in 9th International Conference on Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017), Oxford, 2017, pp. 368–377

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Barsade, The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Adm. Sci. Q. 47(4), 644–675 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Bertini, L. Wathieu, The framing effect of price format. Working Paper, Harvard Business School (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Brodbeck, R. Kerschreiter, A. Mojzisch, D. Frey, S. Schulz-Hardt, The dissemination of criticial, unshared information in decision making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32(1), 35–56 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Cheng, W. Chiou, Framing effects in group investment decision making: role of group polarization. Psychol. Rep. 102(1), 283–292 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Cosley, S. Lam, I. Albert, J. Konstan, J. Riedl, Is seeing believing? How recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions, in Proceedings of CHI’03 (2003), pp. 585–592

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Esser, Alive and well after 25 years: a review of groupthink research. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 73(2–3), 116–141 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Felfernig, G. Friedrich, B. Gula, M. Hitz, T. Kruggel, R. Melcher, D. Riepan, S. Strauss, E. Teppan, O. Vitouch, Persuasive recommendation: serial position effects in knowledge-based recommender systems, in 2nd International Conference of Persuasive Technology (Persuasive 2007). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4744 (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 283–294

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Felfernig, B. Gula, G. Leitner, M. Maier, R. Melcher, S. Schippel, E. Teppan, A dominance model for the calculation of decoy products in recommendation environments, in AISB Symposium on Persuasive Technologies, Aberdeen, 2008, pp. 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Felfernig, C. Zehentner, G. Ninaus, H. Grabner, W. Maalej, D. Pagano, L. Weninger, F. Reinfrank, Group decision support for requirements negotiation, in Advances in User Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7138 (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Felfernig, E. Teppan, K. Isak, Decoy effects in financial service E-sales systems, in RecSys’11 Workshop on Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems (Decisions@RecSys’11), Chicago, IL, 2011, pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Forsyth, Group Dynamics (Thomson Higher Education, Belmont, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Fraser, C. Gouge, M. Billig, Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1(1), 7–30 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Greitemeyer, S. Schulz-Hardt, Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84(2), 332–339 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Highhouse, A. Gallo, Order effects in personnel decision making. Hum. Perform. 10, 31–46 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Huber, J. Payne, C. Puto, Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypotheses. J. Consum. Res. 9, 90–98 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Jacowith, D. Kahneman, Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21(11), 1161–1166 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Jameson, M. Willemsen, A. Felfernig, M. de Gemmis, P. Lops, G. Semeraro, L. Chen, Human decision making and recommender systems, in Recommender Systems Handbook, 2nd edn., ed. by F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 611–648

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Janis, Victims of Groupthink (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Kerr, G. Kramer, R. MacCoun, Bias in judgement: comparing individuals and groups. Psychol. Rev. 103(4), 687–719 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Levine, E. Russo, Impact of anticipated interaction on information acquisition. Soc. Cogn. 13(3), 293–317 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Luce, Individual Choice Behavior (Wiley, New York, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Mandl, A. Felfernig, E. Teppan, M. Schubert, Consumer decision making in knowledge-based recommendation. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 37(1), 1–22 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Masthoff, Group recommender systems: combining individual models, in Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, New York, 2011), pp. 677–702

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Masthoff, A. Gatt, In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment: affective state in group recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 16(3–4), 281–319 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. McElroy, J. Seta, Framing effects: an analytic-holistic perspective. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 610–617 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. Milch, E. Weber, K. Appelt, M. Handgraaf, D. Krantz, From individual preference construction to group decisions: framing effects and group processes. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 108(2), 242–255 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. Miller, N. Fagley, The effects of framing problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17(5), 517–522 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Mojzisch, S. Schulz-Hardt, Knowing others preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98(5), 794–808 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Moscovici, M. Zavalloni, The group as a polarizer of attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 12(2), 125–135 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Murphy, C. Hofacker, R. Mizerski, Primacy and recency effects on clicking behavior. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 11(2), 522–535 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Neale, M. Bazerman, G. Northcraft, C. Alperson, Choice shift effects in group decisions: a decision bias perspective. Int. J. Small Group Res. 2(1), 33–42 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Nipher, On the distribution of errors in numbers written from memory. Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis 3, CCX–CCXI (1878)

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Osmani, Heuristics and cognitive biases: can the group decision-making avoid them? Acad. J. Interdisciplinary Stud. 5(3), 225–232 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. P. Paese, M. Bieser, M. Tubbs, Framing effects and choice shifts in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 56(1), 149–165 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Quijano-Sanchez, J. Recio-García, B. Díaz-Agudo, G. Jiménez-Díaz, Social factors in group recommender systems. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 4(1), 8:1–8:30 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Schulz-Hardt, D. Frey, C. Lüthgense, S. Moscovici, Biased information search in group decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78(4), 655–669 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. V. Sessa, R. Kaiser, J. Taylor, R. Campbell, Executive selection: a research report on what works and what doesn’t. Center for Creative Leadership (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Slaughter, J. Bagger, A. Li, Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 100(1), 47–59 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Stettinger, A. Felfernig, G. Leitner, S. Reiterer, Counteracting anchoring effects in group decision making, in 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP’15), Dublin, 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9146 (2015), pp. 118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M. Stettinger, A. Felfernig, G. Leitner, S. Reiterer, M. Jeran, Counteracting serial position effects in the Choicla group decision support environment, in 20th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI2015), Atlanta, GA, 2015, pp. 148–157

    Google Scholar 

  47. C. Sunstein, R. Hastie, Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. E. Teppan, A. Felfernig, Minimization of decoy effects in recommender result sets. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 1(4), 385–395 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. G. Tomer, Implications of perceived utility on individual choice and preferences: a new framework for designing recommender system. J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag. 24(2), 55–64 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. D. Winterfeldt, W. Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Felfernig, A., Boratto, L., Stettinger, M., Tkalčič, M. (2018). Biases in Group Decisions. In: Group Recommender Systems . SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75067-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75067-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75066-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75067-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics