Skip to main content

Further Choice Scenarios

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

Abstract

Until now, we have focused on group recommendation techniques for choice scenarios, related to explicitly-defined items. However, further choice scenarios exist that differ in the way alternatives are represented and recommendations are determined. We introduce a categorization of these scenarios and discuss knowledge representation and group recommendation aspects on the basis of examples.

Alexander Felfernig, Müslüm Atas, Ralph Samer, Martin Stettinger, Thi Ngoc Trang Tran, and Stefan Reiterer

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We limit our discussions to scenarios with three partitions.

  2. 2.

    For a discussion of the potential impacts of voting strategies, we refer to [16].

  3. 3.

    The aggregation functions used in this and other scenarios are considered as convenient, however, other alternatives might exist.

  4. 4.

    For example, choco-solver.org.

  5. 5.

    In order to reduce evaluation efforts, a user could specify only preferred items and the system would assume negative evaluations for items a user did not evaluate.

References

  1. E. Alanazi, M. Mouhoub, B. Mohammed, A preference-aware interactive system for online shopping. Comput. Inform. Sci. 5(6), 33–42 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Aldanondo, E. Vareilles, Configuration for mass customization: how to extend product configuration towards requirements and process configuration. J. Intell. Manuf. 19(5), 521–535 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Falkner, A. Felfernig, A. Haag, Recommendation technologies for configurable products. AI Mag. 32(3), 99–108 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Felfernig, R. Burke, Constraint-based recommender systems: technologies and research issues, in ACM International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC08), Innsbruck, Austria (2008), pp. 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Felfernig, M. Schubert, G. Friedrich, M. Mandl, M. Mairitsch, E. Teppan, Plausible repairs for inconsistent requirements, in 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’09), Pasadena, CA (2009), pp. 791–796

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Felfernig, C. Zehentner, G. Ninaus, H. Grabner, W. Maalej, D. Pagano, L. Weninger, F. Reinfrank, Group decision support for requirements negotiation, in UMAP 2011: Advances in User Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7138 (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Felfernig, M. Schubert, C. Zehentner, An efficient diagnosis algorithm for inconsistent constraint sets. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 26(1), 53–62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Felfernig, M. Jeran, G. Ninaus, F. Reinfrank, S. Reiterer, M. Stettinger, Basic approaches in recommendation systems, in Recommendation Systems in Software Engineering (Springer, Berlin, 2013), pp. 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Felfernig, M. Schubert, S. Reiterer, Personalized diagnosis for over-constrained problems, in 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013), Peking, China (2013), pp. 1990–1996

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Felfernig, L. Hotz, C. Bagley, J. Tiihonen, Knowledge-Based Configuration: From Research to Business Cases, 1st edn. (Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Felfernig, M. Atas, T.N. Trang Tran, M. Stettinger, Towards group-based configuration, in International Workshop on Configuration 2016 (ConfWS’16) (2016), pp. 69–72

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Felfernig, M. Stettinger, A. Falkner, M. Atas, X. Franch, C. Palomares, OpenReq: recommender systems in requirements engineering, in RS-BDA17, Graz, Austria (2017), pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Haugen, An empirical study of using planning poker for user story estimation, in AGILE 2006 (2006), pp. 23–34

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Jameson, S. Baldes, T. Kleinbauer, Two methods for enhancing mutual awareness in a group recommender system, in ACM International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Gallipoli, Italy (2004), pp. 447–449

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Leitner, A. Fercher, A. Felfernig, K. Isak, S. Polat Erdeniz, A. Akcay, M. Jeran, Recommending and configuring smart home installations, in International Workshop on Configuration 2016 (ConfWS’16) (2016), pp. 17–22

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Levin, B. Nalebuff, An introduction to vote-counting schemes. J. Econ. Perspect. 9(1), 3–26 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Masthoff, Group modeling: selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 14(1), 37–85 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Nguyen, F. Ricci, A chat-based group recommender system for tourism, in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, ed. by R. Schegg, B. Stangl (Springer, Cham, 2017), pp. 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Ninaus, A. Felfernig, M. Stettinger, S. Reiterer, G. Leitner, L. Weninger, W. Schanil, IntelliReq: intelligent techniques for software requirements engineering, in Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems Conference (PAIS) (2014), pp. 1161–1166

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Polat-Erdeniz, A. Felfernig, M. Atas, Cluster-specific heuristics for constraint solving, in International Conference on Industrial, Engineering, Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA/AIE), Arras, France (2017), pp. 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Qi, N. Mamoulis, E. Pitoura, P. Tsaparas, Recommending packages to groups, in 16th International Conference on Data Mining (IEEE, Piscataway, 2016), pp. 449–458

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Qi, N. Mamoulis, E. Pitoura, P. Tsaparas, Recommending packages with validity constraints to groups of users. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 54, 1–30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Schmid, Scoping software product lines, in Software Product Lines – Experience and Research Directions (Springer, Boston, 2000), pp. 513–532

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Stumptner, An overview of knowledge-based configuration. AI Commun. 10(2), 111–125 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Tsang, Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction (Academic Press, London, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Xie, L. Lakshmanan, P. Wood, Breaking out of the box of recommendations: from items to packages, in 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Barcelona, Spain (2010), pp. 151–158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Felfernig, A., Boratto, L., Stettinger, M., Tkalčič, M. (2018). Further Choice Scenarios. In: Group Recommender Systems . SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75067-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75067-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75066-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75067-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics