Advertisement

Intersecting Language Repertoires When 4-Year-Olds Count

  • David Wagner
  • Annica Andersson
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider an interaction among a researcher and four 4-year-old boys who were asked to count beans. By recognizing multiple discourses at play, we problematize the identification of this (and other) interaction as a mathematical (or counting) situation. We identify aspects of the children’s language repertoires and consider how they index various discourses and authority structures. We ask how these discourses intersect in the interaction, and then identify potential implications for education practice and research.

Keywords

Authority Positioning Counting Early childhood Discourses 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, as part of a grant entitled “Students’ language repertoires for investigating mathematics” (Principal Investigator: David Wagner).

References

  1. Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2016). Language repertoires for mathematical and other discourses. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1166–1172). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  2. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–51). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fetzer, M., & Tiedemann, K. (2018). The interplay of language and objects in the process of abstracting. In J. Moschkovich, D. Wagner, A. Bose, J. Rodrigues, & M. Schütte (Eds.), Language and communication in mathematics education, international perspectives (pp. 91–103, this volume). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795.Google Scholar
  6. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., Johnson, K., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2005). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rotman, B. (1988). Toward a semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica, 72(1/2), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Lagenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Wagner, D., Dicks, J., & Kristmanson, P. (2015). Students’ language repertoires for prediction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1), 246–261.Google Scholar
  15. Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 46, 871–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  2. 2.Malmö UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations