# Making Student Explanations Relevant in Whole Class Discussion

## Abstract

Students explaining their mathematics is vital to the teaching and learning of mathematics, yet we know little about how to enable and support students to explain in whole class discussions beyond teachers asking particular questions. In this chapter we use a conversation analytic approach to explore the interactional structures that make student explanations relevant. Through a detailed examination of interactions where a student explanation occurs, three distinct structures are identified where a student explanation is perceived to be relevant. Our focus in the analysis is the social actions students themselves do in their explanations to display their interpretation of the interaction as requiring an explanation and constraining the type of explanation. However, these structures also offer ways that teachers can use the structure of interaction to encourage students to offer explanations in their responses.

## Keywords

Conversation analysis Explanations Classroom interaction Preference Conditional relevance## References

- Antaki, C. (1994).
*Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts*. London: SAGE.Google Scholar - Bilmes, J. (1988). The concept of preference in conversation analysis.
*Language in Society,**17*(2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cazden, C. B. (2001).
*Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning*. Westport: Heinemann.Google Scholar - Drageset, O. G. (2015). Different types of student comments in the mathematics classroom.
*Journal of Mathematical Behaviour,**38,*29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P. (1997). Teachers creating change: Examining evolving beliefs and classroom practice. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.),
*Mathematics teachers in transition*(pp. 255–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbam Associates.Google Scholar - Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**60*(4), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Heritage, J. (1984).
*Garfinkel and ethnomethodology*. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar - Ingram, J., Andrews, N., & Pitt, A. (2016). Patterns of interactions that encourage student explanations in mathematics lessons. In G. Adams (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 36*(1), 42–47.Google Scholar - Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2014). Turn taking and ‘wait time’ in classroom interactions.
*Journal of Pragmatics,**62,*1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2016). A critical analysis of the role of wait time in classroom interactions and the effects on student and teacher interaction.
*Cambridge Journal of Education,**46,*1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcription notation. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.),
*Structures of social interaction*. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingence and the work of teaching.
*Journal of Pragmatics,**23,*55–69.Google Scholar - Lemke, J. L. (1985).
*Using language in the classroom*. Geelong, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar - McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.
*Language in Society,**7,*183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mehan, H. (1979).
*Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mercer, N. (1992). Talk for teaching and learning. In K. Norman (Ed.),
*Thinking voices: The National Oracy project*(pp. 215–223). London: Hodder & Soughton.Google Scholar - Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007).
*Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach*. London: Routledge.Google Scholar - Milani, R. (2012). Dialogical questioning in mathematics education. In
*Pre-proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education, topic study group 28*, COEX, Seoul, Korea, July 8–15, 2012.Google Scholar - Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’? An investigation of teacher-student interaction.
*Applied Linguistics,**21*(3), 376–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement.
*Research in the Teaching of English,**25,*261–290.Google Scholar - Quasthoff, U., Heller, V., & Morek, M. (2017). On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction: An analytic framework.
*Discourse Studies,**19*(1), 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rogoff, B. (1991). Guidance and participation in spatial planning. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.),
*Perspectives on socially shared cognition*(pp. 349–383). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schegloff, E. A. (2007).
*A primer for conversation analysis: Sequence organization*. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sidney, P. G., Hattikudur, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2015). How do contrasting cases and self-explanation promote learning? Evidence from fraction division.
*Learning and Instruction,**40,*29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975).
*Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF: A single case analysis.
*Language Learning,**59*(4), 796–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.),
*Handbook of educational psychology*(pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom.
*Linguistics and Education,**5,*1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2011). Pursuing a question: Reinitiating IRE sequences as a method of instruction.
*Journal of Pragmatics,**43,*475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar