Abstract
This text concerns the process of prospective teachers learning to engage in dialogue with their students in mathematics classes to promote learning. A teaching practice course on mathematics was designed to promote a meeting between the prospective teachers and the concept of dialogue. Investigation, reflection and planning activities were developed to provide such a meeting. The chapter focuses on the dialogue practice of one prospective teacher in the teaching course. Based on these practices of dialogue and theoretical inspirations about dialogue and about interaction, I propose an interpretation for dialogue, whose underlying political stance assumes that the talk is shared by those involved in it. I emphasize the move of going to where the other is in order to understand what she/he says, and also propose some actions that could contribute to the process of learning to be engaged in dialogue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almeida, M. G., & Fernandes, J. A. (2010). A comunicação promovida por futuros professores na aula de Matemática. Zetetike, 18(34), 109–154.
Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2004). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Ball, D. L., & Fornazi, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.
Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto (L. O. Rocha, Trans.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2006). A disciplina e a prática da pesquisa qualitativa. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), O planejamento da pesquisa qualitativa: Teorias e abordagens (S. R. Netz, Trans.). (pp. 15–41). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Jarvis, P. (1999). The practioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Lins, R. C. (1999). Por que discutir teoria do conhecimento é relevante para a Educação Matemática. In M. A. V. Bicudo (Ed.), Pesquisa em Educação Matemática: Concepções & perspectivas (pp. 75–94). São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
Lins, R. C. (2004). Matemática, monstros, significados e educação matemática. In M. A. V. Bicudo & M. Borba (Eds.), Educação Matemática: Pesquisa em movimento (pp. 92–120). São Paulo: Cortez.
Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.
Milani, R. (2015). O processo de aprender a dialogar por futuros professores de matemática com seus alunos no estágio supervisionado (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of Sao Paulo, Rio Claro, Brazil.
Moyer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questioning used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 293–315.
Oliveira, V. C. A. (2012). Sobre as ideias de estranhamento e descentramento na formação de professores de professores de matemática. In C. L. Angelo, E. P. Barbosa, J. R. V. Santos, S. C. Dantas, & V. C. A. Oliveira (Eds.), Modelo dos campos semânticos e educação matemática: 20 anos de história (pp. 199–216). São Paulo: Midiograf.
Penteado, M. G. (2001). Computer-based learning environments: Risks and uncertainties for teachers. Ways of Knowing Journal, 1(2), 23–35.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of investigation. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(4), 123–132.
Skovsmose, O. (2009). Researching possibilities. In M. Setati, R. Vithal, C. Malcolm, & R. Dhunpath (Eds.), Researching possibilities in mathematics, science and technology education (pp. 105–119). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Skovsmose, O. (2014). Researching possibilities. In O. Skovsmose (Ed.), Critique as uncertainty (pp. 111–126). Charlotte: Ed. Information Age Publishing.
Streitlien, A. (2010). Pupils’ participation in the classroom discourse of mathematics. In B. Sriraman et al. (Eds.), The first sourcebook on Nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 211–222). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Wallach, T., & Even, R. (2005). Hearing students: The complexity of understanding what they are saying, showing, and doing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Netherlands, 8(5), 393–417.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milani, R. (2018). “I Am Sorry. I Did Not Understand You”: The Learning of Dialogue by Prospective Teachers. In: Moschkovich, J., Wagner, D., Bose, A., Rodrigues Mendes, J., Schütte, M. (eds) Language and Communication in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75054-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75055-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)