Skip to main content

Interactional Processes in Inclusive Mathematics Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Communication in Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

  • 1125 Accesses

Abstract

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities requires that persons with disabilities should not be excluded from the general education system. This legal right surpasses the mere freedom of choice to attend a regular school. Against the backdrop of this transformation of the practice of mathematics learning in Germany, this article examines the potential for social and content-related participation in inclusive school teaching that may emerge in whole class discussions among students, teachers and pedagogical staff. The data comprises transcripts of video-recorded lessons that were analysed through interactional analysis. The presented analyses of classroom conversations in a Year 1 class reveal interaction that was structured by the teacher through repetitive sequences, enabling the participation of many pupils but providing them few opportunities to participate outside of these structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartelheimer, P. (2008). Was bedeutet Teilhabe? In J. Maedler (Ed.), TeilHabeNichtse. Chancengerechtigkeit und kulturelle Bildung (pp. 13–19). München, Germany: Kopaed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G., & Voigt, J. (1988). Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies. In H.-G. Steiner & A. Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and Methodology of the Discipline Mathematics Education (pp. 174–188). University of Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: University Press Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, B. (2017). Spiel-Räume der Partizipation. In M. Beck & R. Vogel (Eds.), Geometrische Aktivitäten und Gespräche von Kindern im Blick qualitativen Forschens – Mehrperspektivische Ergebnisse aus den Projekten erStMaL und MaKreKi (pp. 107–132). Festschrift für Götz Krummheuer. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education & Department for Heath. (Eds.). (2015). Special educational needs and disability code of practice: 0 to 25 years. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25. Accessed September 12, 2017.

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannson, M. (2015). Perceptions of mathematics in preschool. LuleÃ¥, Sweden: LuleÃ¥ University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J., & Schütte, M. (2017). Content-related and social participation in inclusive mathematics education. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education. Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, D. (2012). In Widersprüchen denken, und dennoch handlungsfähig bleiben - Inklusion in einem segregierenden Schulsystem. In GEW Lüneburg (Eds.), Widerstehen lernen – wieder stehen lernen (pp. 99–133). Moisburg, Germany: GEW Lüneburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, K. (2013). Inklusion in Deutschland – eine bildungsstatistische Analyse. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (1992). Lernen mit »Format«. Elemente einer interaktionistischen Lerntheorie. Diskutiert an Beispielen mathematischen Unterrichts. Weinheim, Germany: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (1995). The Ethnography of Argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 229–270). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G., & Brandt, B. (2001). Paraphrase und Traduktion. Partizipationstheoretische Elemente einer Interaktionstheorie des Mathematiklernens in der Grundschule. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1986). Kollektive Lernprozesse. Studien zur Grundlegung einer soziologischen Lerntheorie. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, H. (2014). Inclusion in mathematics in primary school. Växjö, Sweden: Linnaeus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütte, M. (2014). Language-related specialised learning in mathematics. A comparison of learning settings: family, nursery and primary school. The International Journal on Mathematics Education (ZDM), 46 (6), 923–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder (Eds.). (2016). Compact data on education. The most important statistics on the educational system in Germany. Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (Eds.). (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all. France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, J. (1984). Interaktionsmuster und Routinen im Mathematikunterricht. Theoretische Grundlagen und mikroethnographische Fallunterscheidungen. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe Berry, R. A., & Kim, N. (2008). Exploring teacher talk during mathematics instruction in an inclusion classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 101(6), 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Jung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jung, J. (2018). Interactional Processes in Inclusive Mathematics Teaching. In: Moschkovich, J., Wagner, D., Bose, A., Rodrigues Mendes, J., Schütte, M. (eds) Language and Communication in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75054-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75055-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics