Abstract
Autonomous vehicles could become an important part of the mobility solution for members of society previously excluded from driving. This paper presents the results of an interview study on users’ needs and expectations of fully autonomous vehicles, and specifically on the inclusivity considerations that emerged. Six drivers and two individuals that are currently excluded from driving participated in this study. The main finding was that conventional multimodal interfaces would indeed enable a broader range of users to operate these vehicles. However, fundamental considerations such as the accessibility of displays and easy ingress/egress were of equal importance. We hope the emerging recommendations would form part of an inclusive set of user requirements to be taken into account by industry and academia when designing fully autonomous vehicle user interfaces.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amanatidis T, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ (2017a) Needs and expectations for fully autonomous vehicle user interfaces. In: Manuscript submitted for publication in proceedings of human-robot interaction conference, Chicago, IL, US, Mar 2018
Amanatidis T, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ (2017b) Toward an “equal-footing” human-robot interaction for fully autonomous vehicles. In: Chen J (ed) Advances in human factors in robots and unmanned systems, Springer, pp 313–319
Catapult Transport Systems (2015) Intelligent mobility: traveller needs and UK capability study. Catapult Transportation Systems. https://ts.catapult.org.uk/current-projects/traveller-needs-uk-capability-study/. Accessed 13 Nov 2017
Clark B, Parkhurst G, Ricci M (2016) Understanding the socioeconomic adoption scenarios for autonomous vehicles: a literature review. Project report, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/29134. Accessed 13 Nov 2017
Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Keates S, Lebbon C (2013) Inclusive design: design for the whole population. Springer Science & Business Media
Endsley MR (2016) Designing for situation awareness: an approach to user-centered design, 2nd edn. CRC Press
Field A, Hole H (2002) How to design and report experiments. SAGE
Google (2014) Self-driving car project. A first drive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqSDWoAhvLU. Accessed 5 Dec 2017
Jeon M, Politis I, Shladover SE, Sutter C, Terken JMB, Poppinga B (2016) Towards life-long mobility: accessible transportation with automation. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, AutomotiveUI’16, Ann Arbor, MI, US, pp 203–208, 24–26 October 2016
Krome S, Walz SP, Greuter S (2016) Contextual inquiry of future commuting in autonomous cars. In: Proceedings of CHI’16 conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, US, pp 3122–3128, 7–12 May 2016
Langdon P, Johnson D, Huppert F, Clarkson PJ (2015) A framework for collecting inclusive design data for the UK population. Appl Ergon 46(Part B):318–324 (Special Issue: Inclusive Design)
Large DR, Burnett G, Anyasodo B, Skrypchuk L (2016) Assessing cognitive demand during natural language interactions with a digital driving assistant. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, Automotive’UI 16, Ann Arbor, MI, US, pp 67–742, 4–26 October 2016
Meschtscherjakov A, Ratan R, Tscheligi M, McCall R, Szostak D, Politis I et al (2014) 2nd workshop on user experience of autonomous driving. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 6th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, AutomotiveUI’14, Seattle, WA, US, pp 1–3, 17–19 September 2014
Purchase, HC (2012) Experimental human-computer interaction: a practical guide with visual examples. Cambridge University Press
Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton-Nicholls C, Ormston R (2013) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE
Robert Bosch GmbH (2014) Automotive handbook, 9th edn, Wiley
SAE International (2016) SAE J3016: taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE International
Stanton N, Young MS, Walker GH (2007) The psychology of driving automation: a discussion with professor Don Norman. Int J Veh Des 45:289–306
Stanton N, Salmon PM, Rafferty LA (2013) Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
UK Autodrive (2017) The UK autodrive project. http://www.ukautodrive.com/. Accessed 21 June 2017
Wikipedia (2017) Nvivo. Encyclopedia Article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NVivo. Accessed 5 Dec 2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amanatidis, T., Langdon, P.M., Clarkson, P.J. (2018). Inclusivity Considerations for Fully Autonomous Vehicle User Interfaces. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Breaking Down Barriers. CWUAAT 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75027-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75028-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)