Advertisement

Factors Affecting Consumers’ Pro-environmental Behaviours in Saudi Arabia

  • Hawazin Alzubaidi
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Theory and Practice of Emerging Markets book series (ATPEM)

Abstract

Major environmental issues are considered to be partly rooted in consumer overconsumption. Although pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) have been examined extensively in developed, Western countries, researchers recommend future studies to investigate consumers’ PEBs in developing countries. Responding to these calls, this research contributes to the marketing literature from a non-Western perspective. Review of the concepts associated with consumers’ PEBs highlights numerous factors connected with consumers’ PEBs in Saudi Arabia including materialism, social norms, and perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE). The extensive review of relevant literature provides a useful first glimpse to inform marketing strategies harnessing PEBs in the emerging markets and offers a starting point for further qualitative and quantitative research.

Keywords

Pro-environmental behaviour (PEBs) Materialism Social norms Perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) Saudi Arabia 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Grateful thanks go to my supervisors, Dr. Emma Slade and Professor Yogesh K. Dwivedi, who kindly gave me their time to make this chapter possible. I am really thankful for their valuable guidance, feedback, and advice that helped me in improving the content of this chapter.

References

  1. Abdul-Muhmin, A. G. (2007). Explaining consumers’ willingness to be environmentally friendly. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior organizational behavior and human decision processes: Milton Keynes. England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (2011). Theory of planned behavior. Handb Theor Soc Psychol Vol One, 1(2011), 438.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Kandari, A., & Gaither, T. K. (2011). Arabs, the west and public relations: A critical/cultural study of Arab cultural values. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 266–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2014). Feelings that make a difference: How guilt and pride convince consumers of the effectiveness of sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banerjee, B., & McKeage, K. (1994). How green is my value – exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. In C. T. Allen & D. R. John (Eds.), Advances in consumer research., Vol Xxi (Vol. 21, pp. 147–152).Google Scholar
  10. Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1) 291–297.Google Scholar
  11. Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Green products: An exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the east. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2016). A Study of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Green Products. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(3), 211–215.Google Scholar
  13. Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2014). Can protection motivation theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chan, R. Y. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho, Y.-N., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M. I., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1052–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conner, M., & Armitage, C. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4), 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior - how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dermody, J., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., Koenig-Lewis, N., & Zhao, A. L. (2015). Advancing sustainable consumption in the UK and China: The mediating effect of pro-environmental self-identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13–14), 1472–1502.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2015.1061039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.Google Scholar
  22. Fransson, N., & Garling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369–382.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gatersleben, B., White, E., Abrahamse, W., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Values and sustainable lifestyles. Architectural Science Review, 53(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(95)00035-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilg, A., Barr, S., & Ford, N. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures, 37(6), 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (2007). Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hsu, C.-L., Chang, C.-Y., & Yansritakul, C. (2017). Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang, H. (2016). Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2206–2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hurst, M., Dittmar, H., Bond, R., & Kasser, T. (2013). The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hynes, N., & Wilson, J. (2016). I do it, but don't tell anyone! Personal values, personal and social norms: Can social media play a role in changing pro-environmental behaviours? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Janssen, M. A., & Jager, W. (2002). Stimulating diffusion of green products. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(3), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jansson, J. (2011). Consumer eco-innovation adoption: Assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalamas, M., Cleveland, M., & Laroche, M. (2014). Pro-environmental behaviors for thee but not for me: Green giants, green gods, and external environmental locus of control. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Materialistic values: Their causes and consequences. Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world, 11–28.Google Scholar
  38. Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885–893.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, S., Jeong, S.-H., & Hwang, Y. (2013). Predictors of pro-environmental behaviors of American and Korean students: The application of the theory of reasoned action and protection motivation theory. Science Communication, 35(2), 168–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim, Y. (2011). Understanding green purchase: The influence of collectivism, personal values and environmental attitudes, and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Seoul Journal of Business, 17(1), 65.Google Scholar
  41. Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. In G. Menon & A. R. Rao (Eds.), Advances in consumer research., Vol 32 (Vol. 32, pp. 592–599).Google Scholar
  42. Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, Y.-k., Kim, S., Kim, M.-s., & Choi, J.-g. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2097–2105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13–14), 1319–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mariadoss, B. J., Tansuhaj, P. S., & Mouri, N. (2011). Marketing capabilities and innovation-based strategies for environmental sustainability: An exploratory investigation of B2B firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1305–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin, D., & Schouten, J. (2012). Sustainable marketing. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  49. McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moser, A. K. (2015). Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(3), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2015). The impact of materialism and anti-consumption lifestyles on personal debt and account balances. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 654–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2016). Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers' biospheric values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G., & Bartels, J. (2013). The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217–2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Park, J., & Ha, S. (2014). Understanding consumer recycling behavior: Combining the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(3), 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Polonsky, M., Kilbourne, W., & Vocino, A. (2014). Relationship between the dominant social paradigm, materialism and environmental behaviours in four Asian economies. European Journal of Marketing, 48(3/4), 522–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement - scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255–265. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000083090200004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10(1), 221–279.Google Scholar
  64. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Strizhakova, Y., & Coulter, R. A. (2013). The "green" side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(1), 69–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thøgersen, J., de Barcellos, M. D., Perin, M. G., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Consumer buying motives and attitudes towards organic food in two emerging markets: China and Brazil. International Marketing Review, 32(3/4), 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tsang, J. A., Carpenter, T. P., Roberts, J. A., Frisch, M. B., & Carlisle, R. D. (2014). Why are materialists less happy? The role of gratitude and need satisfaction in the relationship between materialism and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 62–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer "attitude - behavioral intention" gap. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ward, S., & Wackman, D. (1971). Family and media influences on adolescent consumer learning. American Behavioral Scientist, 14(3), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yazdanpanah, M., & Forouzani, M. (2015). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students' intention to purchase organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emerging Markets Research Centre (EMaRC), School of Management, Swansea University Bay CampusSwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations