RBF Mesh Morphing

  • Marco Evangelos BiancoliniEmail author


This chapter concerns the use of RBF for mesh morphing in computer-aided engineering (CAE) applications. The main paradigms, including the typical morphing strategies, are provided with a specific focus on surface mesh morphing. The effective use of the reported concepts and numerical means is concisely showcased through some test cases whose RBF is just mentioned because its exhaustive description is one of the principal objectives of the three subsequent chapters pertaining the solution of CAE applications coming from different engineering sectors.


  1. Biancolini ME (2012) Mesh morphing and smoothing by means of Radial Basis Functions (RBF): a practical example using Fluent and RBF Morph. In: Handbook of research on computational science and engineering: theory and practice, p 34.
  2. Biancolini ME (2017) Ridurre le concentrazioni di tensione con il mesh morphing. Analisi e Calcolo n 81 Luglio/AgostoGoogle Scholar
  3. Biancolini ME, Gozzi M (2013). Aircraft design optimization by means of radial basis functions mesh morphing. In: ANSYS user group meeting Italia 2013, Salsomaggiore 1Google Scholar
  4. Biancolini ME, Groth C (2014) An efficient approach to simulating ice accretion on 2D and 3D aerofoils. In: Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2014: Advanced Aero Concepts, Design and Operations, Proceedings of a meeting held 22–24 July 2014, Bristol, UK. Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS). ISBN 9781510802698.Google Scholar
  5. Biancolini ME, Cella U, Mancini M, Travostino G (2013) Shaping up: mesh morphing reduces time required to optimize an aircraft wing. ANSYS Advantage 7:32–34Google Scholar
  6. Botsch M, Kobbelt L (2005) Real-time shape editing using radial basis functions. In: Marks J, Alexa M (eds) Computer graphics, vol 24, no 3. Eurographics 2005Google Scholar
  7. Carr JC, Beatson R, Cherri J, Mitchell T, Fright W, McCallum B (2001) Reconstruction and representation of 3D objects with radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, Los Angeles, CA, pp 67–76Google Scholar
  8. Carr JC, Beatson RK, McCallum BC, Fright WR, McLennan TJ, Mitchell TJ (2003) Smooth surface reconstruction from noisy range data. In: First international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, p 119Google Scholar
  9. Cella U, Groth C, Biancolini ME (2016) Geometric parameterization strategies for shape optimization using RBF mesh morphing. In: Advances on mechanics, design engineering and manufacturing, Lecture notes series in mechanical engineering, pp 537–545, Sep.
  10. Cenni R, Cova M, Bertuzzi G (2016) A CAD-MESH mixed approach to enhance shape optimization capabilities. In: CAE conference, Parma, Italy, 17th–18th Oct 2016Google Scholar
  11. Costa E, Biancolini ME, Groth C, Cella U, Veble G, Andrejasic M (2014) RBF-based aerodynamic optimization of an industrial glider. In: 30th international CAE conference, Pacengo del Garda, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  12. Groth C, Chiappa A, Giorgetti F (2015) Ottimizzazione strutturale di una biella automobilistica mediante mesh morphing. AIAS – Associazione Italiana per l’Analisi delle Sollecitazioni 44° Convegno Nazionale, Università di Messina, 2–5 Sept, AIAS 2015, p 596Google Scholar
  13. Invernizzi S (2013) In: Advanced mesh morphing applications in motorsport. Automotive simulation world congress 2013, 29–30 Oct 2013, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. Levi Z, Levin D (2013) Shape deformation via interior RBF, Pubmed. US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health.
  15. Luboz V, Bailet M, Boichon Grivot C, Rochette M, Diot B, Bucki M, Payan Y (2017) Personalized modeling for real-time pressure ulcer prevention in sitting posture. J Tissue ViabilityGoogle Scholar
  16. Pranzitelli A, Caridi D (2011) An optimization study of a ship hull. ANSYS webinar 7, 9 June 2011.
  17. RBF Morph (2017a) RBF Morph—tutorials documentationGoogle Scholar
  18. RBF Morph (2017b) RBF Morph—users guideGoogle Scholar
  19. Sederberg TW, Parry SR (1986) Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. In Evans DC, Athay RJ (eds) Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH ‘86), New York, pp. 151–160Google Scholar
  20. Sieger D, Menzel S, Botsch M (2014) RBF morphing techniques for simulation-based design optimization. Eng Comput 30(2):161–174Google Scholar
  21. Valentini PP, Biancolini ME (2017a) Interactive sculpting for engineering purposes using augmented-reality, mesh morphing and force-feedback. IEEE consumer electronics magazineGoogle Scholar
  22. Valentini PP, Biancolini ME (2017b) Modellazione interattiva integrando realtà aumentata, morphing geometrico e interfacce aptiche, Analisi e Calcolo N. 78 Gennaio/FebbraioGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiaojun X, Michael Y, Wang QX (2005) Implicit fitting and smoothing using radial basis functions with partition of unity, In: Proceedings—ninth international conference on computer aided design and computer graphics, CAD/CG 2005, vol 2005, pp 139–148Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Enterprise Engineering “Mario Lucertini”University of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations