Abstract
Advanced workflow for fluid structure interaction (FSI) modelling using computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools suitable for the simulation of fluids and structures, that typically are related to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and computational structural mechanics (CSM) techniques respectively, are demonstrated in the present chapter. In this context, RBF are adopted to interface structure and fluid. In the two-way approach the loads computed using CFD (pressures and shear forces) are transferred to the structure using RBF interpolation for the mapping at surfaces (the mapping topic is further deepened in Chap. 13), whilst deformation computed using CSM are then transferred to the CFD mesh using mesh morphing. The latter approach can be also used to transfer the modal shapes, computed using eigenvalues extraction performed through a finite element analysis (FEA) for instance, on the CFD mesh. The effectiveness of the two possible FSI approaches is demonstrated with practical applications pertaining to aeronautical and motorsport fields. The reported FSI implementation can be used to tackle both steady and transient problems. The chapter is concluded showing how the method can handle vortex induced vibrations of a wing in water and the transient effect due to the separation of a store from the wing of an aircraft.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ausoni P (2009) Turbulent vortex shedding from a blunt trailing edge hydrofoil. Ph.D. thesis. STI. Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-thesis-4475
Ausoni P, Zobeiri A, Avellan F, Farhat M (2012) The Effects of a tripped turbulent boundary layer on vortex shedding from a blunt trailing edge hydrofoil. J Fluids Eng 134:051207. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006700
Biancolini ME, Cella U, Groth C, Genta M (2016). Static aeroelastic analysis of an aircraft wind-tunnel model by means of modal RBF mesh updating. J Aerosp Eng 29. ISSN: 0893-1321. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000627
Bungartz HJ, Schäfer M (2006) Fluid-structure interaction: modelling, simulation, optimization, lecture notes in computational science and engineering, vol 53. Springer, Berlin
Castronovo P, Mastroddi F, Stella F, Biancolini ME (2017) Assessment and development of a ROM for linearized aeroelastic analyses of aerospace vehicles. CEAS Aeronaut J 8:353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-017-0243-6
Cella U, Biancolini ME (2012) Aeroelastic analysis of aircraft wind-tunnel model coupling structural and fluid dynamic codes. J Aircr 49(2):407–414
Chambers JR (2005) Innovation in Flight. NASA
Chwalowski P, Florance JP, Heeg J, Wieseman CD, Perry B (2011) Preliminary computational analysis of the HIRENASD configuration in preparation for the aeroelastic prediction workshop. In: International Forum of Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD), IFASD 2011-108, Paris, France
Chwalowski P, Heeg J, Dalenbring M, Jirasek A, Ritter M, Hansen T (2013) Collaborative HIRENASD analyses to eliminate variations in computational results. IFASD-2013-1D
Costa E (2012) Advanced FSI analysis within ANSYS fluent by means of a UDF implemented explicit large displacements FEM solver. Ph.D. Dissertation, Program in Environment and Energy—Cycle XXIV, Industrial Engineering Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata
Di Domenico N, Groth C, Wade A, Berg T, Biancolini ME (2017) Fluid structure interaction analysis: vortex shedding induced vibrations, Procedia Struct Integrity, 8(2018):422–432, ISSN 2452-3216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.042
European Commision (2013) RBF4AERO Project. http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/109141_en.html
Gene H, Jin W, Anita L (2012) Numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction—a review. Commun Comput Phys 12(2):337–377. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.291210.290411s
Invernizzi S (2013) Advanced mesh morphing applications in motorsport. In: Automotive simulation world congress 2013, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 29–30 Oct 2013
MSC (1997) NASTRAN basic dynamic analysis user’s guide spiral-bound—June 15. ISBN-10: 1585240036
NASA (2012) HiReNASD model. https://c3.ndc.nasa.gov/dashlink/static/media/other/HIRENASD_base_legacy.htm
Reina G, Della Sala A, Biancolini ME, Groth C, Caridi D (2014) Store separation: theoretical investigation of wing aeroelastic response. Paper presented at Aircraft structural design conference, Belfast
Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ (2005) The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals, 6th edn, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK
Zobeiri A, Ausoni P, Avellan F, Farhat M (2012) Vortex shedding from blunt and oblique trailing edge hydrofoils. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IAHR international meeting of the workgroup on cavitation and dynamic problems in hydraulic machinery and systems, Brno
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biancolini, M.E. (2017). FSI Workflow Using Advanced RBF Mesh Morphing. In: Fast Radial Basis Functions for Engineering Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75011-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75011-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75009-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75011-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)