Skip to main content

Measure Selection for Urban Transport Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the selection of urban transport measures as a central element in the development of transport plans. Measure selection is a challenge because of the growing number of policy measures available and the lack of evidence on the performance of many of them. The chapter draws on recent European guidance designed to help cities to select suitable measures and package them more effectively to achieve a wide range of objectives or overcome identified transport-related problems. In doing so, it considers the range of measures and the evidence on them; the design of packages; the development of strategies; and the constraints on implementing specific measures and ways of overcoming them. It then introduces a knowledgebase, KonSULT, whose Measure Option Generator and Policy Guidebook are designed to assist cities with this crucial task. Subsequently it considers the contribution of the range of available policy measures to the specific objective of enhanced public health. It concludes with a series of recommendations for good practice in measure selection generally, and more specifically for the selection of policy measures to enhance public health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cerema. (2015). Le versement transport: une contribution essentielle au financement des transports urbains, Collection Essentiel, “Le point sur” – Mobilité et transports. Cerema: Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • CiViTAS. (2016). Retrieved from www.civitas.eu.

  • Eddington, R. (2006). The Eddington Transport Study. Main report: Transport’s role in sustaining the UK’s productivity and competitiveness. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELTIS. (2015). Retrieved from www.eltis.org.

  • Evidence. (2016). Retrieved from www.evidence-project.eu.

  • Goodwin, P. B. (2010). Transport and the economy: Evidence to the House of Commons Transport Committee. Memorandum TE4. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, C., Harrison, R., & Querol, X. (2015). Review of the efficacy of low emission zones to improve urban air quality in European cities. Atmospheric Environment, 111, 161–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, S., Cherry, C. R., Bechle, M., Wu, Y., & Marshall, J. D. (2012). Electric vehicles in China: Emissions and health impacts. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 2018–2024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khreis, H., May, A. D., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2017). Health impacts of urban transport policy measures: A guidance note for practice. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautso, K., et al. (2004). Planning and research of policies for land use and transport for increasing urban sustainability (PROPOLIS). Final report. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., & Matthews, B. (2007). Decision making processes. In S. Marshall & D. Banister (Eds.), Land use and transport planning: European perspectives on integrated policies. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., Kelly, C., Shepherd, S., & Jopson, A. (2012). An option generation tool for potential urban transport policy packages. Transport Policy, 20, 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., Khreis, H., & Mullen, C. A. (2016). Option generation for policy measures and packages: the role of the KonSULT knowledgebase. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Transport Research. Shanghai, July 2016. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., (2016). Measure selection: selecting the most effective packages of measures for sustainable urban mobility plans. Retrieved from www.eltis.eu and www.sump-challenges.eu/kits.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morfeld, P., Groneberg, D. A., & Spallek, M. F. (2014). Effectiveness of low emission zones: Large scale analysis of changes in environmental NO 2, NO and NO x concentrations in 17 German cities. PLoS ONE, 9, e102999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulley, N., et al. (2006). The demand for public transport. Crowthorne: TRL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, V. R., & Achten, P. A. (2016). Non-exhaust PM emissions from electric vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 134, 10–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Transport for London. (2007). Central London Congestion Charging: impacts monitoring; fifth annual report. London: TfL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony D. May .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

May, A.D. (2019). Measure Selection for Urban Transport Policy. In: Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Khreis, H. (eds) Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics