Abstract
The software defined networking (SDN) paradigm has numerous benefits for network operators, including cost aspects, flexibility, and programmability. Using the SDN approach of a separated control and data plane, the controller can order the installation of flow rules in the switches it manages, e.g., via FlowMod messages in case of the OpenFlow protocol. Since the processing time of these messages has a direct impact on the reaction time of the network, it is a key performance indicator for switches and quantifying it in a reliable manner is required for ensuring state consistency between the control and the data plane. Furthermore, real world deployments not only consist of different data plane hardware, but may feature varying control plane delays.
Hence, in this work, we investigate the impact of such a delay on the FlowMod processing time of OpenFlow switches. Firstly, we identify a significant heterogeneity between data plane hardware in terms of processing times as well as the underlying TCP-level behavior. Secondly, we show that despite this heterogeneity, combining switch specific information with delay measurements at the controller can be used to reliably infer FlowMod processing times.
We confirm our results with measurements in a dedicated testbed that is comprised of three different hardware switches, three different SDN controllers, and several high precision measurement devices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40 GHz/16 GB RAM.
- 2.
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500/4G RAM.
- 3.
sudo tc qdisc add dev [interface] root netem delay [delayValue].
- 4.
- 5.
http://osrg.github.io/ryu/, v4.18.
- 6.
https://www.opendaylight.org/software/downloads/hydrogen-base-10, Hydrogen release.
- 7.
http://www.spirent.com/Test-solutions_datasheets/Broadband/PAB/Spirent_TestCenter/STC_C1-Appliance_Datasheet, Spirent TestCenter Application v4.69.986.
- 8.
References
McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., Turner, J.: OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM CCR 38, 69–74 (2008)
Jarschel, M., Zinner, T., Hossfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P., Kellerer, W.: Interfaces, attributes, and use cases: a compass for SDN. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52, 210–217 (2014)
Nguyen-Ngoc, A., Lange, S., Gebert, S., Zinner, T., Tran-Gia, P., Jarschel, M.: Performance evaluation mechanisms for flowmod message processing in openflow switches. In: 2016 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE) (2016)
Kuźniar, M., Canini, M., Kostić, D.: OFTEN testing OpenFlow networks. In: European Workshop on Software Defined Networking (EWSDN) (2012)
OFTest –Validating OpenFlow Switches, Big Switch Networks. http://www.projectoodlight.org/oftest/
Bianco, A., Birke, R., Giraudo, L., Palacin, M.: Openflow switching: data plane performance. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (2010)
Emmerich, P., Raumer, D., Wohlfart, F., Carle, G.: Performance characteristics of virtual switching. In: IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet) (2014)
Rotsos, C., Sarrar, N., Uhlig, S., Sherwood, R., Moore, A.W.: OFLOPS: an open framework for OpenFlow switch evaluation. In: Taft, N., Ricciato, F. (eds.) PAM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7192, pp. 85–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28537-0_9
Rotsos, C., Antichi, G., Bruyere, M., Owezarski, P., Moore, A.: OFLOPS-Turbo: testing the next-generation OpenFlow switch. In: European Workshop on Software Defined Networks (EWSDN) (2014)
Shahbaz, M., et al.: Architecture for an open source network tester. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems (2013)
Jarschel, M., Oechsner, S., Schlosser, D., Pries, R., Goll, S., Tran-Gia, P.: Modeling and performance evaluation of an OpenFlow architecture. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Teletraffic Congress (2011)
Azodolmolky, S., Nejabati, R., Pazouki, M., Wieder, P., Yahyapour, R., Simeonidou, D.: An analytical model for software defined networking: a network calculus-based approach. In: IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2013)
Jarschel, M., Zinner, T., Höhn, T., Tran-Gia, P.: On the accuracy of leveraging SDN for passive network measurements. In: Australasian Telecommunication Networks & Applications Conference (ATNAC) (2013)
Kuźniar, M., Perešíni, P., Kostić, D.: What you need to know about SDN flow tables. In: Mirkovic, J., Liu, Y. (eds.) PAM 2015. LNCS, vol. 8995, pp. 347–359. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15509-8_26
Huang, D.Y., Yocum, K., Snoeren, A.C.: High-fidelity switch models for software-defined network emulation. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking (2013)
Geissler, S., Herrnleben, S., Bauer, R., Gebert, S., Zinner, T., Jarschel, M.: Tablevisor 2.0: Towards full-featured, scalable and hardware-independent multi table processing. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft) (2017)
Pan, H., Xie, G., Li, Z., He, P., Mathy, L.: FlowConvertor: enabling portability of SDN applications. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Communications-INFOCOM 2017. IEEE (2017)
Zhang, P., Li, H., Hu, C., Hu, L., Xiong, L., Wang, R., Zhang, Y.: Mind the gap: monitoring the control-data plane consistency in software defined networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (2016)
Acknowledgments
This work has been performed in the framework of the CELTIC EUREKA project SENDATE-PLANETS (Project ID C2015/3-1), and it is partly funded by the German BMBF (Project ID 16KIS0474). The authors alone are responsible for the content of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyen-Ngoc, A., Lange, S., Geissler, S., Zinner, T., Tran-Gia, P. (2018). Estimating the Flow Rule Installation Time of SDN Switches When Facing Control Plane Delay. In: German, R., Hielscher, KS., Krieger, U. (eds) Measurement, Modelling and Evaluation of Computing Systems. MMB 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10740. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74947-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74947-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74946-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74947-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)