Advertisement

Literature Review and Theoretical Propositions

  • Jan Kraner
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The following “Literature Review and Theoretical Propositions” presents the theoretical foundations of this thesis that underpin the relevance of the subject. Section 2.1 explains the different streams in current literature in the domain of innovation and how they relate to this thesis. Section 2.2 also revisits the theoretical stream of organizational ambidexterity with a view to the objects of this thesis. Both of these sections also cover the status quo of academic literature regarding the subject at hand. The last section (Sect. 2.3) embeds the theoretical propositions of the research, which derived mainly from innovation and organizational ambidexterity literature. However, other related theoretical streams, such as organizational design, project management, leadership, and several others are also feeding into the eventual propositions.

References

Bibliographical References

  1. Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Elsevier Sicence Pubslishers B.V. (North-Holland), CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 80(7):40–47Google Scholar
  3. Abetti PA (2000) Critical success factors for radical technological innovation: a five case study. Creat Innov Manag 9(4):208–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams R, Bessant J, Phelps R (2006) Innovation management measurement: a review. Int J Manag Rev 8:21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adler P, Heckscher C (2013) The collaborative, ambidextrous enterprise. Universia Business Review, Cuarto TriGoogle Scholar
  6. Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Adm Sci Q 41:61–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota Production System. Organ Sci 10(1):43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev 27:17–40Google Scholar
  9. Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  10. Amabile TM (1998) How to kill creativity. Harv Bus Rev (Sept/Oct):77–87Google Scholar
  11. Anderson NR, West MA (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 19(3):235–258.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Adm Sci Q 35(4):605–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20:696–717.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ansoff HI, Stewart JM (1967) Strategies for a technology-based business. Harv Bus Rev 45(November):71–83Google Scholar
  15. Argyris C, Schon D (1978) Organizational learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Astley GW (1985) The two ecologies: population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Adm Sci Q 30:224–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Auh S, Menguc B (2005) Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity. J Bus Res 58:1652–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bahrami H, Evans S (1987) Stratocracy in high-technology firms. Calif Manag Rev 30:51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Baldridge JV, Burnham RA (1975) Organizational innovation: individual, organizational and environment impacts. Adm Sci Q 20:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1989) Managing across borders: the transnational solution. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad Manag J 49(4):741–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Phillips DJ (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ Sci 15(3):259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2002) Process management and technological innovation: a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industry. Adm Sci Q 47:676–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003a) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manag Rev 28:238–256Google Scholar
  25. Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ (2012) Uncovering middle managers’ role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implement Sci 7:28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Birkinshaw J, Gibson C (2004) Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Manag Rev (Summer):47–55Google Scholar
  27. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New York, pp 241–258Google Scholar
  28. Bradach JL (1997) Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Adm Sci Q 42:276–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Creativity versus structure: a useful tension. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 42:93–94Google Scholar
  30. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm Sci Q 42(1):1–34.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Brunner, D. J., Staats, B. R., Tushman, M. L., Upton, D. M., & Morgan, T. (2010). Wellsprings of creation: how perturbation sustains exploration in mature organizations. MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  32. Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organ Sci 2(3):239–262.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.3.239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Burgelman RA (2002) Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Adm Sci Q 47:325–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistrock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Capon N, Farley JU, Lehmann DR, Hulbert JM (1992) Profiles of product innovators among large U.S. manufacturers. Manag Sci 38(2):157–169.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Carlile PR (2004) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ Sci 13(4):442–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Carroll TN (2012) Designing organizations for exploration and exploitation. J Organ Des 1(2):64–68.  https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.1.2.6344Google Scholar
  39. Chen G (2005) Newcomer adaption in teams: multi-level antecedents and outcomes. Acad Manag J 33:334–365Google Scholar
  40. Christensen (2001) Assessing your organization’s innovation capabilities. Lead Lead 21:27–38Google Scholar
  41. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Colurcio M, Wolf P, Kocher P-Y, Spena TR (2012) Asymmetric relationships in networked food innovation. Br Food J 114(5):702–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Cooke-Davies T, Cicmil S, Crawford L, Richardson K (2007) We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Proj Manag J 38(2):50–61Google Scholar
  45. Cottrell T, Nault BR (2004) Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strateg Manag J 25:1005–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Crossan MM, Apaydin M (2010) A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J Manag Stud 47(6):1154–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Daft RL (1978) Dual-core model of organizational innovation. Acad Manag J 21(2):193–210.  https://doi.org/10.2307/255754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag Sci 32:554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34(3):555–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strateg Manag J 23(12):1095–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Davila T, Epstein MJ, Shelton R (2012a) Making innovation work: how to manage it, measure it, and profit from it, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. Retrieved from https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/making-innovation-work/9780133093360/cover.htmlGoogle Scholar
  52. Denison D, Hooijberg R, Quinn RE (1995) Paradox and performance: toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organ Sci 6:524–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dewar RD, Dutton JE (1986) The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Manag Sci 32(11):1422–1433.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Dougherty D (2001) Reimaging the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ Sci 12:612–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Downs GW, Mohr LB (1976) Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Adm Sci Q 21:700–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Drucker PF (1985) Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper & Row, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Duchesneau TD, Cohn S, Dutton J (1979) A study of innovation in manufacturing: determination, processes and methodological issues. Social Science Research Institute, OronoGoogle Scholar
  58. Duncan R (1976) The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. In: Killman RH, Pondy LR, Sleven D (eds) The management of organization. North Holland, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  59. Dutton JE, Ashford SJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad Manag Rev 18:397–428Google Scholar
  60. Dutton JE, Dukerich JM (1991) Keeping and eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaption. Acad Manag J 34(3):517–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Dutton J, Thomas A (1985) Relating technological change and learning by doing. In: Rosenbloom RD (ed) Research on technological innovation, management, and policy, vol 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 187–224Google Scholar
  62. Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21:345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ebadi YM, Utterback J (1984) The effects of communication on technological innovation. Manag Sci 30:572–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ebben JJ, Johnson AC (2005) Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strateg Manag J 26:1249–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Elsbach KD, Kramer MR (1996) Member’s responses to organizational identity threats: encountering and contering. Adm Sci Q 41:442–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Engle RL, Lopez ER, Chan JA, Charns MP (2017) What roles do middle managers play in implementation of innovative practices ? Health Care Manag Rev 42(1):14–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ Sci 20(1):4–21.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ettlie JE (1980) Manpower flows and the innovation process. Manag Sci 26(11):1086–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ettlie JE, Bridges WP, O’Keefe RD (1984) Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Manag Sci 30(6):682–695.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ettlie JE, Reza EM (1992) Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad Manag J 35(4):795–827.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Evan WM (1966) Organizational Lag. Hum Organ 25:51–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):154–177Google Scholar
  73. Freeman C (1982) The economics of industrial innovation. France Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Galbraith J (1973) Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  75. Gatignon H, Tushman ML, Smith W, Anderson P (2002) A structural approach to assessing innovation: construct development of innovatoin locus, type and characteristics. Manag Sci 48(9):1103–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Gergen KJ (1985) The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. Am Psychol 40:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA (1997) The individualized corporation: a fundamentally new approach to management. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J 47(2):209–226.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Acad Manag J 48(5):741–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Gilbert CG (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: can competing frames coexist? Organ Sci 17:150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Goldstein SG (1985) Organizational dualism and quality circles. Acad Manag Rev 10:504–517Google Scholar
  82. Goode WJ (1978) The celebration of heroes: prestige as a social control system. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  83. Gopalakrishnan S, Damanpour F (1997) A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 25:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Graen G (1976) Role making processes within complex organizations. In: Dunnette MD (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp 1201–1245Google Scholar
  85. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122Google Scholar
  86. Greve HR (2007) Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Ind Corp Chang 16:945–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: the value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ Sci 20(2):422–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interoganizational and community contexts. Strateg Manag J 33:571–586.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smjCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Gupta AK, Govindrajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strateg Manag J 21(4):473–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manag J 49(4):693–706.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Hage J (1980) Theories of organization. Wiley Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. Hage J, Aiken M (1970) Social change in complex organizations. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. Håkansson H (1987) Industrial technological development: a network approach. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  94. Hambrick DC (1994) Top management groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. In: Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behaviour, 16th edn. JAI Press, Greenwhich, CT, pp 171–213Google Scholar
  95. Hambrick DC, MacMillan IC (1985) Efficiency of product R&D in business units: the role of stragegic context. Acad Manag J 28:527–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1993) Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harv Bus Rev (Mar–Apr):75–84Google Scholar
  97. Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Am J Sociol 82(5):929–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 49(2):149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm Sci Q 44:82–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Hansen MT, Podolny JM, Pfeffer J (2001) So many ties, so little time: a task contingency perspective on the value of social capital in organizations. Soc Cap Organ 18:21–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Harreld JB, O’Reilly C, Tushman ML (2007) Capabilities at IBM: driving strategy into action. Calif Manag Rev 49(4):21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Hauser JR, Zettelmeyer F (1997) Metrics to evaluate R, D & E. Res Technol Manag 40(4):32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. He ZL, Wong PK (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidesterity hypothesis. Organ Sci 15:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Helfat CE (1997) Know-how and asset complementary and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D. Strateg Manag J 18(5):339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manag J 24:997–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation : the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm Sci Q 35(1):9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Hill CWL, Rothaermel FT (2003) The performance of incumbents firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad Manag Rev 28:257–274Google Scholar
  108. Hiskey DMS, Deezen E (2011a) Today i found out: feed your brain. Retrieved July 5, 2016, from http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2011/11/post-it-notes-were-invented-by-accident/
  109. Holmqvist M (2003) A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organ Stud 24(1):95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Holmqvist M (2004a) Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Retrieved June 9, 2013, from https://vpn.deusto.es/ehost/pdfviewer/,DanaInfo=web.ebscohost.com+pdfviewer?sid=1fb32a04-dc1a-41b9-bcb1-c8de6c8b6ebf@sessionmgr12&vid=1&hid=9
  111. Iansiti M, Clark KB (1994) Integration and dynamic capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Ind Corp Chang 3:557–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. ICAO (2016a) Aviation partnerships for sustainable development. Retrieved June 6, 2016, from http://www.icao.int/Pages/default.aspx
  113. Jacobs J (1965) The death and life of great American cities. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  114. Jansen JJP, George G, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2008) Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity : the moderating role of transformational leadership. J Manag Stud 45(July):983–1007Google Scholar
  115. Jansen JJP, Tempelaar MP, van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2009) Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organ Sci 20(4):797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Jansen JJP, van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2005) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 57:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52(11):1661–1674.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Jansen JP, Simsek Z, Cao Q (2012) Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strateg Manag J 33(March):1286–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smjCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK (1993) Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. J Mark 57:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad Manag J 56(1):137–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Journal SE, Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML, Lynch M (2007) Building bridges: the social structure of interdependent innovation. Strateg Entrep J 122(November):103–122.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sejGoogle Scholar
  122. Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introdution. Acad Manag J 45:1183–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Kaudela-Baum S, Holzer J, Kocher P-Y (2014) Innonvation leadership. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  124. Kimberly JR, Evanisko MJ (1981) Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption and adminstrative innovations. Acad Manag J 24(4):689–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. King N (1992) Modelling the innovation process: an empirical comparison of approaches. J Occup Organ Psychol 65:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. King N, Anderson N, West MA (1992) Organizational innovation: a case study of perceptions and processes. Work Stress 5:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Klarner P, Raisch S (2013) Move to the beat: rhythms of change and firm performance. Acad Manag J 56(1):160–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML (2007) Building bridges: the social structure of interdependent innovation. Strateg Entrep J 122(November):103–122.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sejCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Knott AM (2002) Exploration and exploitation as complements. In: Bontis N, Choo CW (eds) The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 339–358Google Scholar
  130. Kogut B (2000) The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strateg Manag J 21:405–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Koza MP, Lewin AY (1998) The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ Sci 3:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Krone KJ, Jablin FM, Putnam L (1987) Communication theory and organizational communication. In: Krone KJ, Putnam LL, Roberts KH, Porter LM (eds) Handbook of organizational communication: an interdisciplinary perspective. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 18–40Google Scholar
  134. Kyriakopoulos K, Moorman C (2004) Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: the overlooked role of market orientation. Int J Res Mark 21:219–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Lackner H, Güttel WH, Garaus C, Konlechner S, Müller B, Christiangarausjkuat CG, Stefankonlechnerjkuat SK (2011) Different ambidextrous learning architectures and the role of HRM systems. Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  136. Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad Manag J 49(4):797–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad Manag Ann 4:37–41Google Scholar
  138. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment, managing differentiation and integration. Division of Research, Grauduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  139. Leonard-Barton DA (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manag J 14:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Leybourne AS, Sainter P (2012) Advancing project management. Proj Manag J 43(6):5–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmjCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Leybourne SA, Sadler-Smith E (2006) Going-with-your-gut: the role of intuition and improvisation in project management. Int J Proj Manag 24(6):483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Lin Z, Yang H, Demirkan I (2007) The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Manag Sci 53:1645–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J Manag 32(5).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
  145. Lukas CV, Charns MP, Cramer IE, Meterko M, Schwartz M, Cohen AB et al (2016a) Transformational change in health care: an organizational model. Health Care Manag Rev 32(4):309–320. Retrieved from http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/omtch/overview.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Lynch KD (2007) Modeling role enactment: linking role theory and social cognition. J Theory Soc Behav 37(4):379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Maidique MA (1980) Entrepreneurs, champions and technological innovation. Sloan Manag Rev 2:59–67Google Scholar
  148. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad Manage J 44:118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Mensch G (1979) Stalemate in technology: innovations overcome the depression. Ballinger, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  151. Meyer AD, Brooks GR, Goes JB (1990) Environmentla jolts and industry revolutions: organizational response to discontinuous change. Strateg Manag J 11:93–110Google Scholar
  152. Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  153. Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and enviroment: the third link. Strateg Manag J 4:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Miller D, Friesen PH (1984) Organizations: a quantum view. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NYGoogle Scholar
  155. Miller D, Friesen PH (1982) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firm: two models of strategic momentum. Strateg Manag J 3:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Mintzberg H (1989) Mintzberg on management: inside our strange world of organizations. Pree Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  157. Mom TJM, van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2007) Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: the influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J Manag Stud 44(6):910–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Mom TJM, van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2009) Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ Sci 20(4):812–828.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Mumford MD, Licuanan B (2004) Leading for innovation: conclusions, issues, and directions. Leadersh Q 15:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:242–266Google Scholar
  161. Nelson RE (1989) The strength of strong ties: social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad Manag J 32:377–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. Am Econ Rev 72(1):114–142Google Scholar
  163. Nonaka I, Konno N (1998) The concept of “ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif Manag Rev 40:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  165. Nonaka I, Toyama R, Nagata A (2000) A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Ind Corp Chang 9(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Nooteboom B, Haverbeke WV, Duyster G, Gilsing V, von den Oord A (2006) Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res Policy 36:1016–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. O’Reilly CA, Tushman M (2007) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. SSRN Electron J.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.978493
  168. O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harv Bus Rev 82:74–81Google Scholar
  169. Ojasalo J (2008) Management of innovation networks: a case study of different approaches. Eur J Innov Manag 11(2):51–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Parthasarthy R, Hammond J (2002) Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effect of the innovation process. J Eng Technol Manag 19:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Perretti F, Negro G (2006) Filling empty seats: how status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Acad Manag J 49(4):759–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Peters T, Waterman RH (2004) In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies, 2nd Editio edn. Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  173. Pettigrew A (1985) The awakening giant: continuity and change in TCI. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  174. Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ Sci 1(3):267–292.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Pinto JK (2016) Project management: achieving competitive advantage, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Edinburgh, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  176. Pittaway L, Robertson M, Munir K, Denyer D, Neevly A (2004) Networking and innovation: a sytematic review of the evidence. Int J Manag Rev 5(6):137–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Am J Sociol 98:829–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Probst G, Raisch S (2005) Organizational crisis : the logic. Acad Manag Exec 19(1)Google Scholar
  179. Putman RD (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  180. Putnam RD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democr 6:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Raisch S (2006) Exploration vs. exploitation: a metaparadigm view of ambidextrous organizational forms. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, August, Atlanta, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  182. Raisch S (2008) Balanced structures: designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Plan 41(5):483–508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag 34(3):375–409.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058Google Scholar
  184. Raisch S, Tushman ML (2011) A dynamic perspective on ambidexterity : structural differentiation and boundary activitiesGoogle Scholar
  185. Raisch S, Tushman ML, Birkinshaw J, Probst G (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Adm Sci Q 49:101–133Google Scholar
  187. Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: inderdependancies among elements of organizational design. Manag Sci 49(3):290–311.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strateg Manag J 22(4):287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Rosenkranz NA (2012) Connecting the dots: studies on boundary-spanning ambidexterity at the individual, project, firm and alliance level, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  190. Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strateg Manag J 22(6/7):687–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strateg Manag J 25(3):201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D (2000) Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strateg Manag J 21:369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2005) Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organ Sci 16(5):491–508.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Saren MA (1984) A classification and review of process models of innovation. R&D Manag 14:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  196. Sheremata W (2000) Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product devleopment under time pressure. Acad Manag Rev 25:389–408Google Scholar
  197. Sidhu J, Volberda H, Commandeur H (2004) Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: some empirical evidence. J Manag Stud 41:913–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Siggelkow N, Levinthal D (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ Sci 14(6):650–669.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Siggelkow N, Rivkin J (2006) When exploration backfires: unintended consequences of organizational search. Acad Manag J 49:779–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Simsek Z (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. J Manag Stud 46(4):597–624.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF, Souder D (2009) A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. J Manag Stud 46(5)Google Scholar
  202. Smith WK (2006) Top management team approaches to simultaneously managing exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management best conference paper proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  203. Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):381–403Google Scholar
  204. Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ Sci 16(5):522–536.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Sorenson JB (2002) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Adm Sci Q 47(1):70–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Sorenson JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Adm Sci Q 45(1):81–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res Policy 35(7):994–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Spender JC, Grant RM (1996) Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strateg Manag J 17(Special Issue)Google Scholar
  209. Subramaniam M, Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad Manag J 48:450–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Sutcliffe K, Sitkin S, Browning L (2000) Tailoring process management to situational requirements. In: Cole R, Scott WR (eds) The quality movement and organization theory. Sage, London, pp 315–330Google Scholar
  211. Taylor A, Helfat CE (2009) Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organ Sci 20(4):718–739.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Teece D (2006) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (long-run) enterprise performance. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  213. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28:1319–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Thomas J, Mengel T (2008) Preparing project managers to deal with complexity: advances project management education. J Proj Manag 26(3):304–315Google Scholar
  215. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. Manag J 28:553–561Google Scholar
  216. Tripsas M (2009) Technology, iodentity, and inertia through the lens of “The digital photography company”. Organ Sci 20(2):441–460.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and interia: evidence from digital imaging. Strateg Manag J 21:1147–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business-unit innovation and performance. Acad Manag J 44:996–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Tsai W (2002) Social structure of “coopetition” within a multi-unit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ Sci 13:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Acad Manag J 41(4):464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Tuckman B (1965) Development sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull 63:384–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Tushman ML (2011) Organizational ambidexterity in action. Calif Manag Rev 53(4)Google Scholar
  223. Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31(3):439–465.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Tushman ML, Anderson P (1991) Managing through cycles of technological change. Res Technol Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  225. Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad Manag 3(3):613–624Google Scholar
  226. Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manag Rev 3:8–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in organizational behavior. JAI PressGoogle Scholar
  228. Tushman ML, Smith WK (2002) Organization technology. In: Baum J (ed) Companion to organization. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 368–414Google Scholar
  229. Tushman M, Nadler D (1980) A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational dynamics. AMACOM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  230. Tushman M, Smith WK, Wood RC, Westerman G, O’Reilly C (2010) Organizational designs and innovation streams. Ind Corp Chang 19(5):1331–1366.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Tushman MT, Moore WL (1986) Readings in the management of innovation. Strateg Manag J 6(3):296–297Google Scholar
  232. van de Ven A, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):510–540Google Scholar
  233. Vassolo RS, Anand J, Folta T (2004) Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: a real option-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology. Strateg Manag J 25:1045–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Venkatraman N, Lee C-H, Iyer B (2006) Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: a longitudinal test in the software sector. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, August, Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  235. Volberda H (1998) Building the flexible firm: how to remain competitive. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  236. von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovatoin. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  237. von Krogh G, Venzin M (1995) Anhaltende Wettbewerbsvorteile durch Wissenmanagement. Die Unternehmung 6:417–436Google Scholar
  238. von Kutzschenbach M (2006) Organizational learning and social network structures: case studies of German and Norwegian forest sector organizations. Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg i. BrsgGoogle Scholar
  239. Weick K (1979) Cognitive processes in organizations. In: Staw BM (ed) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CO, pp 41–74Google Scholar
  240. Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  241. Weick KE (1976) Educational organizations of loosely coupled systems. Adm Sci Q 21(1):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2007) Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  243. Wernerfelt B, Montgomery CA (1988) Tobin’s q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Am Econ Rev 78:246–251Google Scholar
  244. West MA (1990) The social psychology of innovation in groups. In: Farr JL (ed) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Chichester, England, pp 4–36Google Scholar
  245. West MA, Borrill CS, Dawson JF, Brodbeck F, Shapiro DA, Haward B (2003) Leadership clarity and team innovation in helath care. Leadersh Q 14:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Westerman G, McFarlan WF, Iansiti M (2006) Organizational design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organ Sci 17:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Revolutioninizing product development. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  248. Winter SG (1995) Four Rs of profitability: rents, resources, routines, and replication. In: Montgomery C (ed) Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: towards a synthesis. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  249. Wolfe RA (1994) Organizational innovation – review, critique and suggested reserach directions. J Manag Stud 31:405–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. Yan A, Louis MR (1999) The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Hum Relat 52(1):25–47Google Scholar
  251. Yin RK (2014) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  252. Zald MN, Denton P (1963) From evangelism to general service: the transformation of the YMCA. Adm Sci Q 7:214–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  253. Zaltman GN, Duncan RB, Holbek J (1973) Innovations and organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  254. Zmud RW (1982) Diffusion of modern software practices: influence of centralization and formalization. Manag Sci 28(12):1421–1431.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Kraner
    • 1
  1. 1.Lucerne University of Applied SciencesLucerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations