Limits to Integration: Persisting Border Obstacles in the EU

Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

This chapter explores the various ways in which borders act as barriers and obstacles in the European Union, and why borders maintain this function even in a context of openness. While most formal barriers to the mobility of goods, capital, services, and labour (i.e. the “four freedoms”) have by now been removed within the European Union, the effects of borders persist. For people living close to borders, these function as obstacles that are related to communication and infrastructure, legal and administrative differences, as well as language and culture. Opinion polls and consultations with European stakeholders witness the importance of addressing regulatory (legal and administrative) obstacles, especially in the fields of labour and education, while language is an important obstacle where more could be done. The chapter finishes with policy recommendations to practitioners seeking to conduct and/or improve systematic policy work to remove border obstacles for enhanced territorial cohesion and regional development.

Keywords

Border obstacles Cross-Border cooperation Border barriers Cross-Border commuters EU borders 

Notes

Acknowledgements

In the case of author Péter Balogh, research for this publication has been supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office—NKFIH grant #NN 114468 (Change and Continuity in Hungarian Spatial Imaginaries: Nationality, Territoriality, Development and the Politics of Borders).

References

  1. Albrow M (1996) The global age: state and society beyond modernity, 1st ed. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Balogh P (2013) Sleeping abroad but working at home: cross-border residential mobility between transnationalism and (re)bordering. Geogr Ann Ser B Hum Geography 95(2):189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balogh P (2014) Perpetual borders: German-Polish cross-border contacts in the Szczecin area. Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, DissGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouwens S (2004) The dynamics of cross-border labor: commuting from the Dutch to the German part of the Euregio Meuse-Rhine, 1960–2000. J Borderland Stud 19(2):135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busse C, Schleper MC, Niu M, Wagner SM (2016) Supplier development for sustainability: contextual barriers in global supply chains. Int J Phys Dist Log Manage 46(5):442–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. In: Information age (Castells, Manuel) 1. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells M (1997) The power of identity. In: Information age (Castells, Manuel) 2. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  8. Castells M (1998) End of millennium. In: Information age (Castells, Manuel) 3. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen-Hattab K (2017) The border as bridge: an Israeli perspective on the Mandelbaum Gate in divided Jerusalem (1948–1967). Middle Eastern Stud 53(6):879–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2016) Overcoming obstacles in border regions. In: Summary report on the online public consultation, 21 Sep–21 Dec 2015. European Union, Brussels. See http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/consultation/overcoming-obstacles-border-regions/results/report_reg-16-006_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2017
  11. European Commission (2017a) Cross-border workers. Official EC website. See https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/individuals/personal-taxation/crossborder-workers_en. Accessed 27 Oct 2017
  12. European Commission (2017b) Cross-border commuters. Official EC website. See http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/work/work-abroad/cross-border-commuters/index_en.htm. Accessed 27 Oct 2017
  13. European Commission (2017c) Eurostat. In: Cross-border commuting. See http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Statistics_on_commuting_patterns_at_regional_level#Cross-border_commuting. Accessed 12 Nov 2017
  14. Express (2017) We don’t need more Eastern European migrants to be a success says think tank, February 14, Express, http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/767071/Brexit-migrants-European-workers-labour-Migration-Watch-UK
  15. Foucher M (1998) The geopolitics of European frontiers. In: Anderson M, Bort E (eds) The frontiers of Europe, Chapter 15. Pinter Publishers LtdGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen NM (1977) Employment structure and change in Southwest Borderlands functional economic areas, 1968–1972 and 1972–1976: an analysis using one percent continuous work history sample data. Southwest Borderlands Regional Economic Development Project, Mexico-United States Border Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen N (1986) The nature and significance of transborder cooperation in the Mexico-U.S. Borderlands: Some empirical evidence. J Borderlands Stud 1(2):57–65 Google Scholar
  18. ITF [International Transport Workers’ Federation] (2013) European union federations urge action on social dumping, January 29, International Transport Workers’ Federation. http://www.itfglobal.org/en/news-events/news/2013/january/european-union-federations-urge-action-on-social-dumping/
  19. Lorentzon S (2011) Shopping along the border between Norway and Sweden as an engine for regional development. Occasional Papers 2011. Institutionen för kulturgeografi och ekonomisk geografi. Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs universitet 4Google Scholar
  20. Lösch A (1940) The economics of location. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundén T (2004) On the boundary: about humans at the end of territory. Södertörns högskola, HuddingeGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundén T (2009) Valga-Valka, Narva-Ivangorod: Estonia’s divided border cities—co-operation and conflict within and beyond the EU. In: Jańczak J (ed) Conflict and cooperation in divided cities. Logos Verlag, Berlin, pp. 133–149Google Scholar
  23. Mandiner (2012) A kivándorló fiatalok ügyében indít konzultációt a Jobbik, November 17. Mandiner, http://mandiner.hu/cikk/20121117_a_kivandorlo_fiatalok_ugyeben_indit_konzultaciot_a_jobbik
  24. Marcu S (2016) Learning mobility challenging borders: cross-border experiences of Eastern European immigrants in Spain. Mobilities 11(3):343–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martínez O (1990) Transnational fronterizos: cross-border linkages in Mexican border society. J Borderlands Stud 5(1):79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Medeiros E (2010) Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Sweden–Norway. AREA 42(4):434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Medeiros E (2011) (Re)defining the concept of Euroregion. Eur Plan Stud 19(1):141–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Medeiros E (2018) Should EU cross-border cooperation programmes focus on reducing border obstacles. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer BE, Geschiere PE (eds) (1999) Globalization and identity: dialectics of flow and closure. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Miggelbrink J (2014) Crossing lines, crossed by lines: everyday practices and local border traffic in Schengen regulated borderlands. In: Jones R, Johnson C (eds) Placing the border in everyday life. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 137–164Google Scholar
  31. Momentum (2017) Momentum 2018: Indítsuk be Magyarországot!. Momentum, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  32. Nash C, Reid B (2010) Border crossings: new approaches to the Irish border. Irish Stud Rev 18(3):265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newman D (2006a) Borders and bordering. European J Soc Theory 9(2):171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman D (2006b) The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Prog Hum Geogr 30(2):143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordic Council (2005) De nordiske lande—én arbejdsplads, ét hjemmemarked: En redegørelse om fjernelse af grænsehindringer fra samarbejdsministrenes særlige repræsentant Poul Schlüter 2005. In: The Nordic Countries—one working place, one domestic market: an account of removal of border obstacles from the cooperation ministries’ special representative Poul Schluter 2005. Nordic Council, Denmark. See http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A702414&dswid=9853. Accessed 13 Nov 2017
  36. Nordic Council of Ministers (2010) Mandat Arbeidsprogram 2010. Arbeidsgruppene under Ministerradet for Naering, energi og regionalpolitik [Working groups under the Nordic council for economic, energy and regional politics]. Internal working document obtained by the authorsGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordic Council (2017a) Gränshinderdatabasen—A-kassa för personer som spontant söker arbete utomlands. The border obstacle database—employment benefit for persons spontaneously seeking jobs abroad. See http://www.norden.org/sv/nordiska-ministerraadet/samarbetsministrarna-mr-sam/graenshinderarbete/graenshinderdatabasen/aktuella-graenshinder/a-kassa-foer-personer-som-spontant-soeker-arbete-utomlands. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
  38. Nordic Council (2017b) Graenshinderdatabasen. Border Obstacle Data Base. See http://www.norden.org/sv/nordiska-ministerraadet/samarbetsministrarna-mr-sam/graenshinderarbete/graenshinderdatabasen/om-graenshinderdatabasen. Accessed 23 Oct 2017
  39. Paasi A, Prokkola EK (2008) Territorial dynamics, cross-border work and everyday life in the Finnish–Swedish border area. Space Polity 12(1):13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pap N, Reményi P (2017) Re-bordering of the Hungarian South: geopolitics of the Hungarian border fence. Hung Geogr Bull 66(3):235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perkmann M (2003) Cross-border regions in Europe. Significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation. European Urban Reg Stud 10(2):153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pucher J, Stumm T, Schneidewind P (2017) Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions. In: Final report written for the directorate-general for regional and urban policy. March 2017. See http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/studies/2017/easing-legal-and-administrative-obstacles-in-eu-border-regions. Accessed 14 Nov 2017
  43. Ratti R (1993) Strategies to overcome barriers: from theory to practice. In: Ratti R, Reichman S (eds) Theory and practice of transborder cooperation. Verlag Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Basel, pp. 240–246Google Scholar
  44. Region Värmland (2016) Gränspendling Sverige–Norge 2013. Fakta i Korthet. Border commuting Sweden–Norway 2013. Facts in short. See http://www.regionvarmland.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Fakta-i-korthet-nr-11_web.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2017. Reproduced figure obtained from Region Värmland by the authors with permission to use
  45. Scott JW (2009) Bordering and ordering the European neighbourhood: a critical perspective on EU territoriality and geopolitics. TRAMES 13(3):232–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shuttleworth I (2007) Reconceptualising local labour markets in the context of cross-border and transnational labour flows: the Irish example. Political Geogr 26(8):968–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Struga TV (2017) Macron in Eastern Europe: still much water in French wine. August 25, Struga TV. http://strugatv.com/2017/08/25/macron-in-eastern-europe-still-much-water-in-french-wine-europe-dw/
  48. Stupp C (2017) East-West tensions reignite as Poland fights labour rules for truckers. March 2, EURACTIV.com. https://www.euractiv.com/section/transport/news/east-west-tensions-reignite-as-poland-fights-labour-rules-for-truckers/
  49. Svensson S (2013) Social capital and governance in European borderlands: a comparative study of Euroregions as policy actors. Dissertation, Central European University Thesis Collection, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  50. Svensson S (2014) Crossborder regions in policy networks: the EGTC as a tool of interest representation. In: Engl A, Zwilling C (eds) Functional and more? New potential for the European grouping of territorial cooperation. EURAC Research, Bolzano, pp 83–88Google Scholar
  51. Svensson S (2017) Health policy in cross-border cooperation practices: the role of Euroregions and their local government members. Territory, Politics, Governance 5(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teacher Pensions (2017) Mobility and portability. In: Official website of the ‘Teacher Pensions’ organisations. See https://www.teacherpensions.org/topics/mobility-and-portability. Accessed 12 Nov 2017
  53. The Irish Times (2006) European parliament passes services directive. February 16, The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/european-parliament-passes-services-directive-1.772145
  54. Thörnqvist C (2007) From blue-collar wildcats to in the 1970s to public sector resistance at the turn of a new millennium. In: van der Velden S, Dribbusch H, Lyddon D, Vandaele K (eds) Strikes around the world, 1968–2005. Aksant, Amsterdam, pp 321–338Google Scholar
  55. Tjelmeland H (2012) Border as barrier and bridge: the Norwegian-Soviet/Russian border as a political and cultural construction. In: Katajala K, Lähteenmäki M (eds) Imagined, negotiated, remembered: constructing European borders and borderlands. LIT Verlag, Wien, pp. 167–186Google Scholar
  56. Transfrontier Operational Mission (MOT) (2017) Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg and CGET Commissariat général á l’égalité des territoires (CGET). 2017. In: Working group on innovative solutions to cross-border obstacles—final report. See http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/en/european-activities/working-group-on-innovative-solutions-to-cross-border-obstacles/. Accessed 1 Nov 2017
  57. Vallet E, David C (2012) Introduction: the (re)building of the wall in international relations. J Borderlands Stud 27(2):111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Houtum H (1999) Internationalisation and mental borders. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 90(3):329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Houtum H (2000) An overview of European geographic research on borders and border regions. J Borderlands Stud 15(1):57–83Google Scholar
  60. van Houtum H (2003) Borders of comfort. In: Anderson J, O’Dowd L, Wilson TM (eds) New borders for a changing Europe, cross-border co-operation and governance. Frank Cass, London, pp 37–58Google Scholar
  61. Varwick J, Lang KO (2007) European neighbourhood policy: challenges for the EU-policy towards the new neighbours. Barbara Budrich, OpladenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Policy Studies, Central European University (CEU)BudapestHungary
  2. 2.Institute for Regional Studies, CERS, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA)BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations