Skip to main content

Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainability: Past Literature and Future Trends

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations

Abstract

Knowledge, innovation and sustainability are topics very well recognized in the business and management literature and beyond of this field. These subjects seem fundamental to the companies for them to survive and to win in an increasingly globalized world, but how do they appear interconnected on the literature? As research in this area has related these concepts and how these themes have emerged over time, to demonstrate their relevance to this field of science is one of the objectives of this study. Therefore, our study aims to map scientific publications, intellectual structure and research trends on knowledge, innovation and sustainability. Our contribution is precisely to find the theoretical approaches present in the different investigations on this field and to promote the discussion of future agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2006). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., & Varga, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics, 31, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 180e205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., & Hellerstedt, K. (2009). Location attributes and start-ups in knowledge-intensive business services. Industry & Innovation, 16(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banbury, C. M. & Mitchell, W. (1995). The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic Management Journal (summer special issue), 16, 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kuehnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(17), 7301–7306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos-Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8, 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Lai, M., & Wu, W. (2010). Exploring the impact of innovation strategy on R&D employees job satisfaction: A mathematical model and empirical research. Technovation, 30, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2016). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4615–4622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., & Melancon, Y. (2008). On the dynamics of innovation in Quebec’s coastal maritime industry. Technovation, 28, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R. & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Community, population, and organization effects on innovation: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1065–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship – Practice and Principals. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. (2014). Knowledge spillovers: Cooperation between universities and KIBS. R&D in Management, 43(5), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, C., Veiga, P., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Rueda-Armengot, C. (2017). What impact does innovation and sustainable entrepreneurship have on competitiveness? Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2005a). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2005b). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube: A framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International. Journal of Innovation and Management, 13, 683e713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986e1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. T. (1977). Unconventional uses of on-line information retrieval systems: On-line bibliometric studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28(1), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, C., & Brem, A. (2013). Strategic directions on innovation management: A conceptual framework. Management Research Review, 36, 939e954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., & Hsu, Y. (2008). The more interactive, the more innovative? A case study of South Korean cellular phone manufacturers. Technovation, 28, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, S., & Wemmerlov, U. (2006). Product change intensity, product advantage, and market performance: An empirical investigation of the PC industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. TECHNOVATION, 31(1, SI), 2–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, A. (2004). Integrating technology marketing and management innovation. Research Technology Management, 47(4), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2009). A `business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics-A European Review, 18(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, P., de Oliveira, A., & Lopes, T. M. (2008). Knowledge transfer in product development processes: A case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal mechanic sector from São Paulo, Brazil. Technovation, 28, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R. (1994). Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability – the problem of technological regime shifts. Futures, 26(10), 1023–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin, D., Diehl, J. C., & Molenaar, N. (2013). Innovation process of new ventures driven by sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, M. & Sahota, P. (2004). Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation, 24, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L., & Neij, L. (2013). Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mention, A. (2011). Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: Which influence on innovation novelty? Tehnovation, 31, 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutschke, P., Mayr, P., Schaer, P., & Sure, Y. (2011). Science models as value-added services for scholarly information systems. Scientometrics, 89(1), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer, J. I., & Opdam, P. (2008). Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23(6), 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87, 56e64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of Literature I. Libri, 46(3), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddel, M., & Schwer, R. (2003). Regional innovative capacity with endogenous employment: Empirical evidence from the US. The Review of Regional Studies, 33(1), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P., & Amit, R. (2003). The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981 to 1995. Organization Science, 14(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw – Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebode, D., Jeanrenaud, S., & Bessant, J. (2012). Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Management, 42, 195e206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729e753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, R. (2002). Innovation studies in the 21st century: Questions from a user’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(9), 861–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Som, C., Berges, M., Chaudhry, Q., Dusinska, M., Fernandes, T. F., Olsen, S. I., & Nowack, B. (2010). The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. Toxicology, 269(2–3, SI), 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V. (2002). Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research Policy, 31, 877–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Mukherjee, I. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach. Energy, 36(8), 5343–5355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stough, R. (2003). Strategic management of places and policy. Annals of Regional Science, 37(1), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsom Reuters (2008). Using bibliometrics: A guide to evaluating research performance with citation data (Retrieved). Retrieved from http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. III. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kleef, J. A. G., & Roome, N. J. (2007). Developing capabilities and competence for sustainable business management as innovation: A research agenda. Journal of Clean Production, 15, 38e51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varga, A. (2000). Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science, 40, 89–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J.J., Veiga, P.M., Peris-Ortiz, M. (2019). Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainability: Past Literature and Future Trends. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Ferreira, J.J., Merigó Lindahl, J.M. (eds) Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74881-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics