Abstract
To study the properties of nuclear matter, we use nuclear reactions to excite the fundamental modes of the nucleus, which can yield information on the equation of state (EOS) and are also important for understanding nuclear structure aspects of nuclei. Furthermore, it is very important to understand the nuclear processes that precede a supernova event and to understand the properties of nuclear matter in order to explain why stars sometimes explode throwing most of the star material into space leaving a neutron star or a black hole behind.
In the last three decades, the compression modes, the isoscalar giant monopole (ISGMR) and dipole resonances (ISGDR), were extensively studied because of their importance for the determination of the nuclear-matter incompressibility and consequently their implications for the EOS of nuclear matter. Though the nuclear matter incompressibility (K∞) has been reasonably well determined (~240 ± 10 MeV) through comparison of experimental results on several spherical nuclei with microscopic calculations, the asymmetry term was determined with much larger uncertainty. This has been addressed in measurements on a series of stable Sn and Cd isotopes, which resulted in a value of K τ = −550 ± 100 MeV for the asymmetry term in the nuclear incompressibility.
Spin-isospin modes, and in particular the Gamow–Teller (GT) transitions, aside from their interest from the nuclear structure point of view, play very important roles in various phenomena in nature. In nucleosynthesis, the β-decay of nuclei along the s- and r-processes determine the paths that these processes follow and the abundances of the elements synthesised. In supernova explosions, GT transitions are of paramount importance in the pre-supernova phase where electron capture occurs on neutron-rich fp-shell nuclei at the high temperatures of giant stars. Electron capture is mediated by GT transitions. Electron capture removes the electron pressure that keeps the star from collapsing precipitating an implosion followed by a cataclysmic explosion throwing much of the star material into space and leaving a neutron star or black hole behind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
W. Bothe, W. Gentner, Z. Phys. 71, 236 (1937)
A.B. Migdal, J. Phys. (USSR) 8, 331 (1944)
G.C. Baldwin, G.S. Klaiber, Phys. Rev. 71, 3 (1947)
M. Goldhaber, E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 74, 1046 (1948)
H. Steinwedel, J.H.D. Jensen, Phys. Rev. 79, 1019 (1950)
M.N. Harakeh, A. van der Woude, Giant Resonances: Fundamental High-Frequency Modes of Nuclear Excitations. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001), and references therein
R. Pitthan, T. Walcher, Phys. Lett. B 36, 563 (1971)
M.N. Harakeh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 676 (1977)
D.H. Youngblood et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1188 (1977)
M.N. Harakeh et al., Nucl. Phys. A 327, 373 (1979)
J.P. Blaizot, Phys. Rep. 64, 171 (1980)
S. Stringari, Phys. Lett. B 108, 232 (1982)
R.C. Nayak et al., Nucl. Phys. A 516, 62 (1990), and references therein
M. Uchida et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, 051301 (2004)
G. Colò et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 024307 (2004)
T. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 162503 (2007)
T. Li et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 034309 (2010)
S.K. Patra et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 044304 (2002)
H. Sagawa et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 034327 (2007)
F. Petrovich, W.G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A 354, 499 (1981)
C. Gaarde, in Proc. Niels Bohr Centennial Conf., Copenhagen, eds. by R. Broglia, G. Hageman, B. Herskind (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985)
J. Rapaport, E. Sugarbaker, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 44, 109 (1994), and references therein
H.A. Bethe et al., Nucl. Phys. A 324, 487 (1979)
G.M. Fuller, W.A. Fowler, M.J. Newman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 42, 447 (1980)
G.M. Fuller, W.A. Fowler, M.J. Newman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 48, 279 (1982)
G.M. Fuller, W.A. Fowler, M.J. Newman, Astrophys. J. 252, 715 (1982)
G.M. Fuller, W.A. Fowler, M.J. Newman, Astrophys. J. 293, 1 (1985)
T.N. Taddeucci et al., Nucl. Phys. A 469, 125 (1987)
I. Bergqvist et al., Nucl. Phys. A 469, 648 (1987)
M. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4442 (2000)
T.A. Kirsten, Nucl. Phys. B 77, 26 (1999)
V.N. Gavrin, Nucl. Phys. B 77, 20 (1999)
J.N. Bahcall, Nucl. Phys. B 77, 64 (1999)
M. Bhattacharya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4446 (2000)
M. Fujiwara et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 422, 484 (1999)
T. Wakasa et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 482, 79 (2002)
Y. Fujita et al., Phys. Lett. B 365, 29 (1996)
Y. Fujita et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 13, 411 (2002)
W. Mettner et al., Nucl. Phys. A 473, 160 (1987)
F. Ajzenberg-Selove et al., Phys. Rev. C 30, 1850 (1984)
F. Ajzenberg-Selove et al., Phys. Rev. C 31, 777 (1985)
S. El-Kateb et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 3128 (1994)
Y. Fujita et al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 064312 (2003)
Y. Fujita et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 062502 (2004)
Y. Fujita, Nucl. Phys. A 805, 408 (2008), and reference therein
E. Caurier et al., Nucl. Phys. A 653, 439 (1999), and reference therein
K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, Nucl. Phys. A 673, 481 (2000)
K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 79, 1 (2001)
K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 819 (2003)
A. Poves et al., Nucl. Phys. A 694, 157 (2001)
A. Heger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1678 (2001)
A. Heger et al., Astrophys. J. 560, 307 (2001)
W.P. Alford et al., Nucl. Phys. A 514, 49 (1990)
M.C. Vetterli et al., Phys. Rev. C 40, 559 (1989)
W.P. Alford et al., Phys. Rev. C 48, 2818 (1993)
A.L. Williams et al., Phys. Rev. C 51, 1144 (1995)
M. Hagemann et al., Phys. Lett. B 579, 251 (2004)
M. Hagemann et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 014606 (2005)
A.M. van den Berg, Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. B 99, 637 (1995)
S. Rakers et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A 481, 253 (2002)
M. Hagemann et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A 437, 459 (1999)
V.M. Hannen et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 500, 68 (2003)
S. Rakers et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 044323 (2002)
B.D. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. C 43, 50 (1991)
M. Honma et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, 034335 (2004)
C. Bäumer et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 031303 (2003)
C. Bäumer et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 024603 (2005)
L. Popescu et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 054312 (2007)
D. Frekers, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 217 (2006)
D. Patel et al., Phys. Lett. B 718, 447 (2012)
A. Leistenschneider et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5442 (2001)
P. Adrich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 132501 (2005)
C. Monrozeau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 042501 (2008)
M. Vandebrouck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032504 (2014)
M. Vandebrouck et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 024316 (2015)
S. Bagchi et al., Phys. Lett. B 751, 371 (2015)
C.E. Demonchy et al., Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A 583, 341 (2007)
C.E. Demonchy, Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A 573, 145 (2007)
J.C. Zamora et al., Phys. Lett. B 763, 16 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harakeh, M.N. (2018). Giant Resonances: Fundamental Modes and Probes of Nuclear Properties. In: Scheidenberger, C., Pfützner, M. (eds) The Euroschool on Exotic Beams - Vol. 5. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74878-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74878-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74877-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74878-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)