Skip to main content

Variation in Students’ Perceptions of Others for Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Networked Learning

Part of the book series: Research in Networked Learning ((RINL))

Abstract

This chapter presents a description of variation in students’ perceptions of human others as contributors to their networked learning experiences. This description attends to the considerable boundary crossing tacitly implied in an invitation to networked learning for students who are used to classroom-based lectures. This description of variation is the result of phenomenographic research which sought to understand different students’ perceptions as distinct simultaneously related. Students’ perceptions are constituted in terms of an open and inclusive hierarchical structure comprised of three qualitatively distinct ways of perceiving human others as contributors to learning in a formal networked learning environment. Distinct perceptions of other students and of teachers are proposed as in pairwise alignment. Perceptions are emphasised as fluid and situationally bound in practice. No less there is the suggestion that in deepening awareness students and teachers gravitate towards becoming teachers and learners for each other. This description may serve agents and actors of networked learning to positively assess their views, to acknowledge and accommodate diversity and to constructively work towards increasingly sophisticated ways of understanding and approaching learning with and through human others using networked technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Phenomenographic methods: A case illustration. In J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne/Sydney: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, S., & Sinclair, C. (2012). Life behind the screen: Taking the academic online. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutajar, M. (2014a). Qualitative differences in post-compulsory pre-university Maltese students’ accounts of their networked learning experiences. Ph.D, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutajar, M. (2014b). Phenomenography for researching aspects of networked learning: beyond the match of underlying values and beliefs. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutajar, M. (2017). The student experience of learning using networked technologies: An emergent progression of expanding awareness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (2014). Dimensions of identity and the student experience of networked learning. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Networked Learning Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2004a). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 7–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2004b). It's not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFarmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Networked learning and learning networks. In L. Calvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. New York and Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2010). Expanding conceptions of study, context and educational design. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham, S. De Freitas, & G. Conole (Eds.), Rethinking learning for a digital age. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: Students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50(3), 473–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2010). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2016). Experience and networked learning. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Bloxham, S. (2001). Networked legal learning: An evaluation of the student learning experience. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 15(3), 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Steeples, C. (2002). Perspectives and issues in networked learning. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. R., Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). Networked learning a relational approach: Weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. H. (2015). Emerging conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching: Australian TAFE context. Instructional Science, 43(6), 683–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koole, M. (2012). A Social Constructionist Approach to Phenomenographic Analysis of Identity Positioning in Networked Learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning 2012, Maastricht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, S. (2006). Students’ Experiences of e-learning: a Virtual Ethnography into Blended Online Learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference 2006, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lameras, P., Levy, P., Paraskakis, I., & Webber, S. (2012). Blended university teaching using virtual learning environments: Conceptions and approaches. Instructional Science, 40(1), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2010). A personal inquiry into an experience of adult learning online. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - A research approach investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(2), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (2006). E-learning groups and communities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D., Hodgson, V., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). Networked learning: A brief history and new trends. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: Theory and practice. oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolajsen, H. W. (2014). Changing the rules of the game: Using blogs for online discussions in higher education. In V. Hodgson, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, H. T., & Simsek, O. (2012). Of Conflict in Virtual Learning Communities in the Context of a Democratic Pedagogy: A paradox or sophism? Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of Networked Learning, Maastricht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., & Sinclair, C. (2016). The relationships between policy, boundaries and research in networked learning. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., Buus, L., & Georgsen, M. (2012). Differences in understandings of networked learning theory: Connectivity or collaboration? In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, U. (2014). Teacher's use of learning Technology in a South Asian Context. In V. Hodgson, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work disclosed in this publication was partially funded by the Malta Government Scholarship Scheme.

I also acknowledge Professor Paul Ashwin for his supervision during the development of this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cutajar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cutajar, M. (2018). Variation in Students’ Perceptions of Others for Learning. In: Bonderup Dohn, N., Cranmer, S., Sime, JA., de Laat, M., Ryberg, T. (eds) Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74856-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74857-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics