Abstract
This chapter presents a description of variation in students’ perceptions of human others as contributors to their networked learning experiences. This description attends to the considerable boundary crossing tacitly implied in an invitation to networked learning for students who are used to classroom-based lectures. This description of variation is the result of phenomenographic research which sought to understand different students’ perceptions as distinct simultaneously related. Students’ perceptions are constituted in terms of an open and inclusive hierarchical structure comprised of three qualitatively distinct ways of perceiving human others as contributors to learning in a formal networked learning environment. Distinct perceptions of other students and of teachers are proposed as in pairwise alignment. Perceptions are emphasised as fluid and situationally bound in practice. No less there is the suggestion that in deepening awareness students and teachers gravitate towards becoming teachers and learners for each other. This description may serve agents and actors of networked learning to positively assess their views, to acknowledge and accommodate diversity and to constructively work towards increasingly sophisticated ways of understanding and approaching learning with and through human others using networked technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Phenomenographic methods: A case illustration. In J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne/Sydney: RMIT University Press.
Boon, S., & Sinclair, C. (2012). Life behind the screen: Taking the academic online. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York: Springer.
Cutajar, M. (2014a). Qualitative differences in post-compulsory pre-university Maltese students’ accounts of their networked learning experiences. Ph.D, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Cutajar, M. (2014b). Phenomenography for researching aspects of networked learning: beyond the match of underlying values and beliefs. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014, Edinburgh.
Cutajar, M. (2017). The student experience of learning using networked technologies: An emergent progression of expanding awareness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 485–499.
Davis, J. (2014). Dimensions of identity and the student experience of networked learning. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Networked Learning Edinburgh, Scotland.
De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2004a). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 7–39.
De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2004b). It's not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 165–171.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFarmer.
Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Networked learning and learning networks. In L. Calvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. New York and Oxon: Routledge.
Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2010). Expanding conceptions of study, context and educational design. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham, S. De Freitas, & G. Conole (Eds.), Rethinking learning for a digital age. Oxon: Routledge.
Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: Students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50(3), 473–508.
Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2010). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Jones, C. (2016). Experience and networked learning. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, UK.
Jones, C., & Bloxham, S. (2001). Networked legal learning: An evaluation of the student learning experience. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 15(3), 317–329.
Jones, C., & Steeples, C. (2002). Perspectives and issues in networked learning. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer-Verlag.
Jones, C. R., Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). Networked learning a relational approach: Weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 90–102.
Khan, S. H. (2015). Emerging conceptions of ICT-enhanced teaching: Australian TAFE context. Instructional Science, 43(6), 683–708.
Koole, M. (2012). A Social Constructionist Approach to Phenomenographic Analysis of Identity Positioning in Networked Learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning 2012, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Krüger, S. (2006). Students’ Experiences of e-learning: a Virtual Ethnography into Blended Online Learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference 2006, Lancaster.
Lameras, P., Levy, P., Paraskakis, I., & Webber, S. (2012). Blended university teaching using virtual learning environments: Conceptions and approaches. Instructional Science, 40(1), 141–157.
Mann, S. (2010). A personal inquiry into an experience of adult learning online. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publishers.
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - A research approach investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(2), 28–49.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
McConnell, D. (2006). E-learning groups and communities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
McConnell, D., Hodgson, V., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). Networked learning: A brief history and new trends. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York: Springer.
Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: Theory and practice. oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.
Nicolajsen, H. W. (2014). Changing the rules of the game: Using blogs for online discussions in higher education. In V. Hodgson, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ozturk, H. T., & Simsek, O. (2012). Of Conflict in Virtual Learning Communities in the Context of a Democratic Pedagogy: A paradox or sophism? Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of Networked Learning, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Ryberg, T., & Sinclair, C. (2016). The relationships between policy, boundaries and research in networked learning. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ryberg, T., Buus, L., & Georgsen, M. (2012). Differences in understandings of networked learning theory: Connectivity or collaboration? In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. New York: Springer Verlag.
Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.
Shah, U. (2014). Teacher's use of learning Technology in a South Asian Context. In V. Hodgson, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Acknowledgements
The research work disclosed in this publication was partially funded by the Malta Government Scholarship Scheme.
I also acknowledge Professor Paul Ashwin for his supervision during the development of this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cutajar, M. (2018). Variation in Students’ Perceptions of Others for Learning. In: Bonderup Dohn, N., Cranmer, S., Sime, JA., de Laat, M., Ryberg, T. (eds) Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74856-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74857-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)