Advertisement

CTSC, Risk Management and Requirement of a Systemic Approach

Chapter
  • 408 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

In this chapter, the position of Capture, Transport and Storage of CO2 (CTSC) in climate change mitigation is introduced. Then, an overview of CTSC projects in the world is presented. Risks associated to each subsystem and the whole chain are presented. Risks related to the whole chain in a complex sociotechnical framework are classified in eight groups: Technical, Risks related to Project, Social, Policy/Strategy, HSE, Regulatory, Organizational/Human and Financial/Economic. Notions of risk and risk management are also introduced, followed by a general recall of the evolution of risk management approaches. In the last part, available risk management approaches for Capture, Transport and Storage are reviewed individually. Finally, integrated (systemic) approaches are argued as essential need of risk management for CTSC.

Keywords

Risk Management Approach Systems-Theoretic Accident Model And Processes (STAMP) International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) Large-scale Integration Project (LSIP) Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Altenbach TJ (1995) A Comparison of risk assessment techniques from qualitative to quantitative. In: submitted to the ASME pressure and piping conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 23–27 July 1995Google Scholar
  2. BARPI (2012) Barpi: vingt ans d’accidents industriels, Bureau d’Analyse des Risques et Pollutions Industriels, Face au risque, n° 481, mars 2012. Accessed 23 Sept 2012. http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/ressources/em4_barpi_20_ans.pdf
  3. Benson SM (2002) Comparative evaluation of risk assessment, management and mitigation approaches for deep geological storage of CO2. Earth Sciences Division, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson SM (2007) Overview of geological storage of Co2, Presentation in geological storage roundtable, 31 May 2007, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrane M (2011) L’évaluation des risques majeurs dans les projets de captage et transport de CO2, Presentation of Centre Technique Industrie, Bureau Veritas, Presented in the international seminar on Capture, Transport and Storage of CO2. Risk management: methods, practical experiences and perspectives, 7–8 Apr 2011, Le Havre, FranceGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouc O, Audigane P, Bellenfant G, Fabriol H, Gastine M, Rohmer J, Seyedi D (2009) Determining safety criteria for CO2 geological storage. Energy Procedia 1:2439–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BRGM (2005) Stockage Géologique du CO2: analyses des risques, surveillance et mesures. Rapport Final, septembre 2005Google Scholar
  8. Cambon J (2007) Vers une nouvelle méthodologie de mesure de la performance des systèmes de management de la sante-sécurité au travail, Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris, Spécialité: Sciences et Génie des Activités à Risques, novembre 2007Google Scholar
  9. Carayon P (2006) Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Appl Ergon 37(2006):525–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CCJ (2010) Shell Barendrecht project cancelled. Carbon Capture J, November 5, 2010. Accessed 22 June 2012. http://www.carboncapturejournal.com/displaynews.php?NewsID=676
  11. CCP (2007) Public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage: prioritized assessment of issues and concerns. Summary for policy-makers, CO2 Capture Project®, March 2007. Accessed 20 July 2012. http://ccs101.ca/assets/Documents/iea_public_perception_of_ccs.pdf
  12. Condor J, Unatrakarn D, Wilson M, Asghari K (2011) A comparative analysis of risk assessment methodologies for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Energy Procedia 4(2011):4036–4043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Coninck H, Flach T, Curnow P, Richardson P, Anderson J, Shackley S, Sigurthorsson G, Reiner D (2009) The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors, Part 1. Scientific, technical and economic dimensions. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3(2009):333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desroches A, Leroy A, Vallée F (2007) La gestion des risques, Lavoisier, p 101Google Scholar
  15. Desroches A, Leroy A, Quaranta JF, Vallée F (2006) Dictionnaire d’analyse et de gestion des risques, Lavoisier, p 23Google Scholar
  16. De Visser E, Hendriks Ch, Barrio M, Mølnvik M, De Koeijer G, Liljemark S, Le Gallo Y (2008) Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2(2008):478–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DNV (2010) Design and operation of CO2 pipelines Recommended practice DNV-RP-J202. Det Norske Veritas, Norway, Apr 2010Google Scholar
  18. Dulac N (2007) A framework of dynamic safety and risk management modeling in complex engineering systems. PhD thesis submitted to the department of aeronautical and astronautical engineering at MIT, Feb 2007Google Scholar
  19. Durand D (2010) La systémique, Presses Universitaires de France (PUF), 11th edn, Jan 2010Google Scholar
  20. Energy Institute (2010) Technical guidance on hazard analysis for onshore carbon installations and onshore pipelines, published by Energy Institute, London, 1st edn, Sept 2010Google Scholar
  21. EPA (2016) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html#three. Accessed 26 Mar 2016
  22. ESRL (2017) Earth system research laboratory global monitoring division. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html. Accessed 30 July 2017
  23. EU Directive (2009) Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009, on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006Google Scholar
  24. Eurlex website, Official Journal of European Union, Official Journal L 010, 14/01/1997, 0013–0033. Accessed 12 June 2012. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996L0082:EN:HTML
  25. Fabriol H (2009) Risk management and uncertainties: ensuring CO2 storage safety. In: 3rd international symposium: capture and geological storage of CO2, 5–6 Nov 2009, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Farret R, Gombert P, Lahaie F, Roux P (2009) Vers une méthode d’analyse des risques globale de la filière CSC, intégrant plusieurs échelles de temps, Rapport Scientifique, INERIS, 2008-2009, pp 100–110Google Scholar
  27. Feenstra CFJ, Mikunda T, Brunsting S (2010) What happened in Barendrecht? Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands, ECN/CAESAR, 3 Nov 2010Google Scholar
  28. Garbolino E, Chéry JP, Guarnieri F (2009) Dynamic systems modelling to improve risk analysis in the context of Seveso industries. Chem Eng Trans 17:373–378Google Scholar
  29. Garlick A (2007) Estimating risk. A management approach. Gower Publishing Limited, England, pp 9–31Google Scholar
  30. GCCSI (2009) Strategic analysis of the global status of carbon capture and storage. Report 5: synthesis report, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  31. GCCSI (2011) The global status of CCS: 2011. Global CCS Institute 2011, Canberra, Australia. ISBN 978-0-9871863-0-0Google Scholar
  32. GCCSI (2012) The global status of CCS: 2012. Global CCS Institute 2012, Canberra, Australia. ISBN 978-0-9871863-1-7Google Scholar
  33. GCCSI (2016) The global status of CCS: 2016. Global CCS Institute 2016, Summary Report, Australia. ISBN 978-0-9944115-6-3Google Scholar
  34. GCCSI (2017a) Large-scale CCS facilities Project Database. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects. Accessed 6 Oct 2017
  35. GCCSI (2017b) Large-scale CCS facilities Definition. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects-definitions. Accessed 6 Oct 2017
  36. Gerstenberger M, Nicol A, Stenhouse M, Berryman K, Stirling M, Webb T, Smith W (2009) Modularised logic tree risk assessment method for carbon capture and storage projects. Energy Procedia 1:2495–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Groeneweg J (2002) Controlling the controllable, preventing business upsets, 5th edn. Global Safety Group, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  38. Hellström T (2003) Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technol Soc 25(2003):369–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hellström T (2009) New vistas for technology and risk assessment? The OECD programme on emerging systemic risks and beyond. Technol Soc 31(2009):325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hnottavange-Telleen K, Krapac I, Vivalda C (2009) Illinois Basin-Decateur Project: initial risk assessment results and framework for evaluating site performance. Energy Procedia 1(2009):2431–2438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Published by Ashgate publishing company, England. ISBN 0754643018Google Scholar
  42. IEA (2017) Energy technology perspectives 2017. International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  43. IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. IRGC (2009) Power plant CO2 capture technologies, risks and risk governance deficits. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva. ISBN 978-2-9700672-2-1Google Scholar
  45. IRGC (2010) The emergence of risks: contributing factors. Report of International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, 2010. ISBN 978-2-9700672-7-6Google Scholar
  46. ISO 31000 (2010) Risk management. Principles and guidelines, Jan 2010. NF ISO 31000:2010-01Google Scholar
  47. Johnsen K, Holt H, Helle K, Sollie OK (2009) Mapping of potential HSE issues related to large-scale capture, transport and storage of CO2. DNV Report for PetroleumstilsynetGoogle Scholar
  48. Kapetaki Z, Scowcroft J (2017) Overview of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) demonstration project business models: risks and enablers on the two sides of the Atlantic. Energy Procedia 114(2017):6623–6630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kerlero de Rosbo G (2009) Integrated risk analysis for large-scale CCS projects implementation. Thèse professionnelle du Master Spécialisé en Ingénierie et gestion de l’Environnement (ISIGE)Google Scholar
  50. Koivisto R, Wessberga N, Eerolaa A, Ahlqvista T, Kivisaaria S, Myllyojaa J, Halonena M (2009) Integrating future-oriented technology analysis and risk assessment methodologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:1163–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Koornneef J, Spruijt M, Molag M, Ramirez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2010) Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines—a review of uncertainties and their impacts. J Hazard Mater 177:12–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lacq Project (2012), Documents concerning Lacq Project, available on the regional prefecture website. Accessed from Nov 2010 to Oct 2012. http://www.pyrenees-atlantiques.pref.gouv.fr/Politiques-publiques/Environnement-risques-naturels-et-technologiques/Pilote-d-injection-de-CO2/Projet-de-captage-CO2-de-Total/
  53. Leveson N (1995) Safeware, system safety and computers. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN 0201119722Google Scholar
  54. Leveson N (2004) A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 42:237–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leveson N (2009) Engineering a safer world, system safety for the 21st century, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 2009 (a draft book). Accessed 1st Dec 2011. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/safer-world.pdf
  56. Longannet (2011) FEED documents of Longannet project, published online http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/emissions/ccs/demo_prog/feed/scottish_power/scottish_power.aspx. Accessed 29 Nov 2011
  57. Magne L, Vasseur D (2006) Risques Industriels, complexité, incertitude, et décision: une approche interdisciplinaire, Lavoisier, collection EDF R&D, p 181Google Scholar
  58. Mazouni MH (2008) Pour une Meilleure Approche du Management des Risques: De la Modélisation Ontologique du Processus Accidentel au Système Interactif d’Aide à la Décision, Thèse, Doctorat de l’Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Spécialité: Automatique, Traitement du Signal et Génie Informatique, Novembre 2008, pp 39–42Google Scholar
  59. MIT (2016) Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cancelled or Inactive Projects. http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index_cancelled.html. Accessed 4 July 2017
  60. Neele F, Mikunda T, Seebregts A, Santen S., Van der Burgt A, Nestaas O, Apeland S, Stiff S, Hustad C (2011) Developing a European CO2 transport infrastructure, WP 1.1 Needs for a future framework for CCS, Revision 19, TNO. Accessed 12 June 2012. http://www.co2europipe.eu/Publications/CO2Europipe%20-%20Executive%20Summary.pdf
  61. OECD (2003) Emerging risks in the 21st century. An agenda for action, organization for economic co-operation and development. OECD Publications Service, FranceGoogle Scholar
  62. Oldenburg CM, Bryant SL, Nicot JPh (2009) Certification framework based on effective trapping for geologic carbon sequestration. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3:444–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perry KF (2005) Natural gas storage industry experience and technology: potential application to CO2 geological storage. In: Thomas DC, Benson SM (eds) Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geological formations. Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
  64. PMBOK (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 4th edn, Project Management Institute, USA. ISBN 978-1-933890-5-7Google Scholar
  65. PTRC (2004) IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 monitoring & storage project: summary report 2000-2004. In: from the proceedings of the 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, 5–9 Sept 2004, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  66. Rochon E, Kuper J, Bjureby E, Johnston P, Oakley R, Santillo D, Schulz N, Von Goerne G (2008) False hope: why carbon capture and storage won’t save the climate, Greenpeace, Published in May 2008 by Greenpeace International, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  67. Sadgrove K (2005) The complete guide to business risk management, 2nd edn. Gower Publishing Limited, England, pp 277–284Google Scholar
  68. Samadi J, Garbolino E (2011) A new dynamic risk analysis framework for CO2 capture, transport and storage chain. In: 29th international conference of system dynamics society, 24–28 July 2011, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  69. Savage D, Maul PhR, Benbow S, Walke RC (2004) A generic FEP database for the assessment of long-term performance and safety of the geological storage of CO2. Quintessa report, June 2004Google Scholar
  70. Seiersten M (2001) Material selection for separation, transportation and disposal of CO2. In: Proceedings of the corrosion 2001. National Association of Corrosion Engineers, paper 01042. Accessed 15 June 2012. http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/app/Preview.do?paperNumber=NACE-01042&societyCode=NACE
  71. Serpa J, Morbee J, Tzimas E (2011) Technical and economic characteristics of a CO2 transmission pipeline infrastructure. JRC report, European Union, EUR 24731 EN. ISBN 978-92-79-19425-2, ISSN 1018-5593. Accessed 17 Mar 2011.  https://doi.org/10.2790/30861, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/16038/1/reqno_jrc62502_aspublished.pdf
  72. Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D (2002) Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J Loss Prev Process Ind 15:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. UNDP (2007) Human Development report 2007/2008, Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world, Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), USA. ISBN 978-0-230-54704-9Google Scholar
  74. Wilpert B, Fahlbruch B (1998) Safety related interventions in inter-organisational fields, Chapter 14, pp 235–248. In Hale & Baram, 1998, Safety Management, The challenge of change, PergamonGoogle Scholar
  75. Wright I (2011) Geologic CO2 storage assurance at In Salah, JIP phase 1: storage capacity assessment. Presented in: CSLF projects interactive workshop. 1–2 March 2011, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia, Accessed 18 June 2012. www.cslforum.org/publications/documents/alkhobar2011/GeologicCO2StorageAssurance_InSalahAlgeria_Session1.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MINES ParisTechParisFrance
  2. 2.CRCMINES ParisTechSophia-Antipolis CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations