Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

CTSC, Risk Management and Requirement of a Systemic Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Future of CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage Projects

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science ((BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL))

  • 564 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the position of Capture, Transport and Storage of CO2 (CTSC) in climate change mitigation is introduced. Then, an overview of CTSC projects in the world is presented. Risks associated to each subsystem and the whole chain are presented. Risks related to the whole chain in a complex sociotechnical framework are classified in eight groups: Technical, Risks related to Project, Social, Policy/Strategy, HSE, Regulatory, Organizational/Human and Financial/Economic. Notions of risk and risk management are also introduced, followed by a general recall of the evolution of risk management approaches. In the last part, available risk management approaches for Capture, Transport and Storage are reviewed individually. Finally, integrated (systemic) approaches are argued as essential need of risk management for CTSC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altenbach TJ (1995) A Comparison of risk assessment techniques from qualitative to quantitative. In: submitted to the ASME pressure and piping conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 23–27 July 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • BARPI (2012) Barpi: vingt ans d’accidents industriels, Bureau d’Analyse des Risques et Pollutions Industriels, Face au risque, n° 481, mars 2012. Accessed 23 Sept 2012. http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/ressources/em4_barpi_20_ans.pdf

  • Benson SM (2002) Comparative evaluation of risk assessment, management and mitigation approaches for deep geological storage of CO2. Earth Sciences Division, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson SM (2007) Overview of geological storage of Co2, Presentation in geological storage roundtable, 31 May 2007, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrane M (2011) L’évaluation des risques majeurs dans les projets de captage et transport de CO2, Presentation of Centre Technique Industrie, Bureau Veritas, Presented in the international seminar on Capture, Transport and Storage of CO2. Risk management: methods, practical experiences and perspectives, 7–8 Apr 2011, Le Havre, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouc O, Audigane P, Bellenfant G, Fabriol H, Gastine M, Rohmer J, Seyedi D (2009) Determining safety criteria for CO2 geological storage. Energy Procedia 1:2439–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRGM (2005) Stockage Géologique du CO2: analyses des risques, surveillance et mesures. Rapport Final, septembre 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambon J (2007) Vers une nouvelle méthodologie de mesure de la performance des systèmes de management de la sante-sécurité au travail, Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris, Spécialité: Sciences et Génie des Activités à Risques, novembre 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayon P (2006) Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Appl Ergon 37(2006):525–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCJ (2010) Shell Barendrecht project cancelled. Carbon Capture J, November 5, 2010. Accessed 22 June 2012. http://www.carboncapturejournal.com/displaynews.php?NewsID=676

  • CCP (2007) Public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage: prioritized assessment of issues and concerns. Summary for policy-makers, CO2 Capture Project®, March 2007. Accessed 20 July 2012. http://ccs101.ca/assets/Documents/iea_public_perception_of_ccs.pdf

  • Condor J, Unatrakarn D, Wilson M, Asghari K (2011) A comparative analysis of risk assessment methodologies for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Energy Procedia 4(2011):4036–4043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Coninck H, Flach T, Curnow P, Richardson P, Anderson J, Shackley S, Sigurthorsson G, Reiner D (2009) The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors, Part 1. Scientific, technical and economic dimensions. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3(2009):333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desroches A, Leroy A, Vallée F (2007) La gestion des risques, Lavoisier, p 101

    Google Scholar 

  • Desroches A, Leroy A, Quaranta JF, Vallée F (2006) Dictionnaire d’analyse et de gestion des risques, Lavoisier, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  • De Visser E, Hendriks Ch, Barrio M, Mølnvik M, De Koeijer G, Liljemark S, Le Gallo Y (2008) Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2(2008):478–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DNV (2010) Design and operation of CO2 pipelines Recommended practice DNV-RP-J202. Det Norske Veritas, Norway, Apr 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulac N (2007) A framework of dynamic safety and risk management modeling in complex engineering systems. PhD thesis submitted to the department of aeronautical and astronautical engineering at MIT, Feb 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand D (2010) La systémique, Presses Universitaires de France (PUF), 11th edn, Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Institute (2010) Technical guidance on hazard analysis for onshore carbon installations and onshore pipelines, published by Energy Institute, London, 1st edn, Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2016) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html#three. Accessed 26 Mar 2016

  • ESRL (2017) Earth system research laboratory global monitoring division. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html. Accessed 30 July 2017

  • EU Directive (2009) Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009, on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurlex website, Official Journal of European Union, Official Journal L 010, 14/01/1997, 0013–0033. Accessed 12 June 2012. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996L0082:EN:HTML

  • Fabriol H (2009) Risk management and uncertainties: ensuring CO2 storage safety. In: 3rd international symposium: capture and geological storage of CO2, 5–6 Nov 2009, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Farret R, Gombert P, Lahaie F, Roux P (2009) Vers une méthode d’analyse des risques globale de la filière CSC, intégrant plusieurs échelles de temps, Rapport Scientifique, INERIS, 2008-2009, pp 100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra CFJ, Mikunda T, Brunsting S (2010) What happened in Barendrecht? Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands, ECN/CAESAR, 3 Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbolino E, Chéry JP, Guarnieri F (2009) Dynamic systems modelling to improve risk analysis in the context of Seveso industries. Chem Eng Trans 17:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlick A (2007) Estimating risk. A management approach. Gower Publishing Limited, England, pp 9–31

    Google Scholar 

  • GCCSI (2009) Strategic analysis of the global status of carbon capture and storage. Report 5: synthesis report, Global CCS Institute, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • GCCSI (2011) The global status of CCS: 2011. Global CCS Institute 2011, Canberra, Australia. ISBN 978-0-9871863-0-0

    Google Scholar 

  • GCCSI (2012) The global status of CCS: 2012. Global CCS Institute 2012, Canberra, Australia. ISBN 978-0-9871863-1-7

    Google Scholar 

  • GCCSI (2016) The global status of CCS: 2016. Global CCS Institute 2016, Summary Report, Australia. ISBN 978-0-9944115-6-3

    Google Scholar 

  • GCCSI (2017a) Large-scale CCS facilities Project Database. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects. Accessed 6 Oct 2017

  • GCCSI (2017b) Large-scale CCS facilities Definition. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects-definitions. Accessed 6 Oct 2017

  • Gerstenberger M, Nicol A, Stenhouse M, Berryman K, Stirling M, Webb T, Smith W (2009) Modularised logic tree risk assessment method for carbon capture and storage projects. Energy Procedia 1:2495–2502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneweg J (2002) Controlling the controllable, preventing business upsets, 5th edn. Global Safety Group, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström T (2003) Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technol Soc 25(2003):369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström T (2009) New vistas for technology and risk assessment? The OECD programme on emerging systemic risks and beyond. Technol Soc 31(2009):325–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hnottavange-Telleen K, Krapac I, Vivalda C (2009) Illinois Basin-Decateur Project: initial risk assessment results and framework for evaluating site performance. Energy Procedia 1(2009):2431–2438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Published by Ashgate publishing company, England. ISBN 0754643018

    Google Scholar 

  • ICPE website 1. http://www.installationsclassees.developpementdurable.gouv.fr/Definition,14731.html. Accessed 12 June 2012

  • IEA (2017) Energy technology perspectives 2017. International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IRGC (2009) Power plant CO2 capture technologies, risks and risk governance deficits. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva. ISBN 978-2-9700672-2-1

    Google Scholar 

  • IRGC (2010) The emergence of risks: contributing factors. Report of International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, 2010. ISBN 978-2-9700672-7-6

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 31000 (2010) Risk management. Principles and guidelines, Jan 2010. NF ISO 31000:2010-01

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen K, Holt H, Helle K, Sollie OK (2009) Mapping of potential HSE issues related to large-scale capture, transport and storage of CO2. DNV Report for Petroleumstilsynet

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapetaki Z, Scowcroft J (2017) Overview of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) demonstration project business models: risks and enablers on the two sides of the Atlantic. Energy Procedia 114(2017):6623–6630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlero de Rosbo G (2009) Integrated risk analysis for large-scale CCS projects implementation. Thèse professionnelle du Master Spécialisé en Ingénierie et gestion de l’Environnement (ISIGE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto R, Wessberga N, Eerolaa A, Ahlqvista T, Kivisaaria S, Myllyojaa J, Halonena M (2009) Integrating future-oriented technology analysis and risk assessment methodologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:1163–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koornneef J, Spruijt M, Molag M, Ramirez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2010) Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines—a review of uncertainties and their impacts. J Hazard Mater 177:12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacq Project (2012), Documents concerning Lacq Project, available on the regional prefecture website. Accessed from Nov 2010 to Oct 2012. http://www.pyrenees-atlantiques.pref.gouv.fr/Politiques-publiques/Environnement-risques-naturels-et-technologiques/Pilote-d-injection-de-CO2/Projet-de-captage-CO2-de-Total/

  • Leveson N (1995) Safeware, system safety and computers. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN 0201119722

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2004) A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 42:237–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2009) Engineering a safer world, system safety for the 21st century, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 2009 (a draft book). Accessed 1st Dec 2011. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/safer-world.pdf

  • Longannet (2011) FEED documents of Longannet project, published online http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/emissions/ccs/demo_prog/feed/scottish_power/scottish_power.aspx. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  • Magne L, Vasseur D (2006) Risques Industriels, complexité, incertitude, et décision: une approche interdisciplinaire, Lavoisier, collection EDF R&D, p 181

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazouni MH (2008) Pour une Meilleure Approche du Management des Risques: De la Modélisation Ontologique du Processus Accidentel au Système Interactif d’Aide à la Décision, Thèse, Doctorat de l’Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Spécialité: Automatique, Traitement du Signal et Génie Informatique, Novembre 2008, pp 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT (2016) Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cancelled or Inactive Projects. http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index_cancelled.html. Accessed 4 July 2017

  • Neele F, Mikunda T, Seebregts A, Santen S., Van der Burgt A, Nestaas O, Apeland S, Stiff S, Hustad C (2011) Developing a European CO2 transport infrastructure, WP 1.1 Needs for a future framework for CCS, Revision 19, TNO. Accessed 12 June 2012. http://www.co2europipe.eu/Publications/CO2Europipe%20-%20Executive%20Summary.pdf

  • OECD (2003) Emerging risks in the 21st century. An agenda for action, organization for economic co-operation and development. OECD Publications Service, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg CM, Bryant SL, Nicot JPh (2009) Certification framework based on effective trapping for geologic carbon sequestration. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3:444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry KF (2005) Natural gas storage industry experience and technology: potential application to CO2 geological storage. In: Thomas DC, Benson SM (eds) Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geological formations. Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMBOK (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 4th edn, Project Management Institute, USA. ISBN 978-1-933890-5-7

    Google Scholar 

  • PTRC (2004) IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 monitoring & storage project: summary report 2000-2004. In: from the proceedings of the 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, 5–9 Sept 2004, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochon E, Kuper J, Bjureby E, Johnston P, Oakley R, Santillo D, Schulz N, Von Goerne G (2008) False hope: why carbon capture and storage won’t save the climate, Greenpeace, Published in May 2008 by Greenpeace International, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadgrove K (2005) The complete guide to business risk management, 2nd edn. Gower Publishing Limited, England, pp 277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Samadi J, Garbolino E (2011) A new dynamic risk analysis framework for CO2 capture, transport and storage chain. In: 29th international conference of system dynamics society, 24–28 July 2011, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage D, Maul PhR, Benbow S, Walke RC (2004) A generic FEP database for the assessment of long-term performance and safety of the geological storage of CO2. Quintessa report, June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiersten M (2001) Material selection for separation, transportation and disposal of CO2. In: Proceedings of the corrosion 2001. National Association of Corrosion Engineers, paper 01042. Accessed 15 June 2012. http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/app/Preview.do?paperNumber=NACE-01042&societyCode=NACE

  • Serpa J, Morbee J, Tzimas E (2011) Technical and economic characteristics of a CO2 transmission pipeline infrastructure. JRC report, European Union, EUR 24731 EN. ISBN 978-92-79-19425-2, ISSN 1018-5593. Accessed 17 Mar 2011. https://doi.org/10.2790/30861, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/16038/1/reqno_jrc62502_aspublished.pdf

  • Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D (2002) Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J Loss Prev Process Ind 15:291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2007) Human Development report 2007/2008, Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world, Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), USA. ISBN 978-0-230-54704-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilpert B, Fahlbruch B (1998) Safety related interventions in inter-organisational fields, Chapter 14, pp 235–248. In Hale & Baram, 1998, Safety Management, The challenge of change, Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright I (2011) Geologic CO2 storage assurance at In Salah, JIP phase 1: storage capacity assessment. Presented in: CSLF projects interactive workshop. 1–2 March 2011, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia, Accessed 18 June 2012. www.cslforum.org/publications/documents/alkhobar2011/GeologicCO2StorageAssurance_InSalahAlgeria_Session1.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MINES ParisTech, Paris, France

    Jaleh Samadi

  2. CRC, MINES ParisTech, Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France

    Emmanuel Garbolino

Authors
  1. Jaleh Samadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanuel Garbolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaleh Samadi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Samadi, J., Garbolino, E. (2018). CTSC, Risk Management and Requirement of a Systemic Approach. In: Future of CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage Projects. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74850-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation