Advertisement

Autism and the Machine

  • Kathleen Richardson
Chapter
Part of the Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI book series (SOCUSRA)

Abstract

In this chapter I explore the etymology of the term ‘machine’—from the ancient Greek mēkhos, meaning ‘contrivance’, which pertains to the contriving of something with skill, inventiveness or deceit. Machine as contrivance is a device or a map and not the territory. Central to imagination is analogical thinking, which allows one thing to stand in place for something else without becoming the thing it stands in for. This type of imaginative thinking is said to be deficient in autistic persons, much like an understanding of metaphor, empathy or humour. But could this type of imaginative thinking be deficient in wider society where analogies between humans and machines are dissolving in place of identification between human and machine? Drawing on the way in which autism is understood through the ‘deficit’ or ‘excess’ model, I explore how the robot’s interventions in the child’s life are imagined to bring about stability through equivalence. This principle of equivalence between children with autism and social robots is underscored by mathematical models built from commercial models of the human.

Bibliography

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2004. The Essential Difference. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2011. Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty. Vol. 30. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Sally Wheelwright, Carol Stott, Patrick Bolton, and Ian Goodyer. 1997. Is There a Link Between Engineering and Autism? Autism-London 1: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Patrick Bolton, Sally Wheelwright, Victoria Scahill, Liz Short, Genevieve Mead, and Alex Smith. 1998. Autism Occurs More Often in Families of Physicists, Engineers, and Mathematicians. Autism 2 (3): 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Emma Ashwin, Chris Ashwin, Teresa Tavassoli, and Bhismadev Chakrabarti. 2009. Talent in Autism: Hyper-Systemizing, Hyper-Attention to Detail and Sensory Hypersensitivity. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 364 (1522): 1377–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, Rodney L. 2002. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, F.A. 2001. Inciting Legal Fictions-Disability’s Date with Ontology and the Abieist Body of the Law. Griffith L. Rev 10: 42–62.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society: Economy, Society and Culture v.1: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol 1. Oxford UK and Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, Graham. 2016. Does a Diagnosis of ASD Help a Person with Intellectual Disabilities? In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Pp. 204–220.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, Kim. 2016. How Rude? Autism as a Study in Ability. In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi, 132–145. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, Margaret and Ngaire Naffine. 2001. Are Persons Property? Legal debates about property and personality. Dartmouth, Ashgate. Pp. 1–202.Google Scholar
  14. de La Mettrie, Julien Offray, and I.I. Frederick. 1912. Man a Machine. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. de Solla Price, Derek J. 1964. Automata and the Origins of Mechanism and Mechanistic Philosophy. Technology and Culture 5 (1): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dworkin, Andrea, and Marvin Heiferman. 1981. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. Vol. 1. London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dworkin, Andrea, and Catharine A. MacKinnon. 1988. Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day for Women’s Equality. Organizing Against Pornography.Google Scholar
  18. Eyal, Gil. 2010. The Autism Matrix. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, Cordelia. 2005. Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences. New York: Icon Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2010. Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2017. Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the Myths of Our Gendered Minds. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  22. Frith, Uta. 1991. Autism and Asperger Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goodley, D. 2016. Autism and the Human. In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi, 146–158. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, Judith, and Jacqui Ashton-Smith. 2011. Missed Diagnosis or Misdiagnosis? Girls and Women on the Autism Spectrum. Good Autism Practice (GAP) 12 (1): 34–41.Google Scholar
  26. Grinker, Roy Richard. 2010. Commentary: On Being Autistic, and Social. Ethos 38 (1): 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hampson, Norman. 1990. The Enlightenment. Vol. 4. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hasse, Cathrine. 2002. Gender Diversity in Play with Physics: The Problem of Premises for Participation in Activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity 9 (4): 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hazan, Cindy, and Phillip Shaver. 1987. Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (3): 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helmreich, Stefan. 1998. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World, Updated with a New Preface. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jeffreys, S. 2014. Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis of the Politics of Transgenderism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Kaminka, G.A. 2013, May. Curing Robot Autism: A Challenge. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 801–804. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.Google Scholar
  34. Kanner, L. 1943. Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact. Nervous Child 2 (3): 217–250.Google Scholar
  35. Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2009. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, Elizabeth Seon-Wha. 2013. Robots for Social Skills Therapy in Autism: Evidence and Designs Toward Clinical Utility. Yale University.Google Scholar
  37. Koehn, Daryl. 1998. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kurzweil, Ray. 2000. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Li, Chaochao, Qingxuan Jia, and Yongli Feng. 2016. Human-Robot Interaction Design for Robot-Assisted Intervention for Children with Autism Based on ES Theory. IEEE.Google Scholar
  41. Liss, Miriam, and Mindy J. Erchull. 2012. Feminism and Attachment Parenting: Attitudes, Stereotypes, and Misperceptions. Sex Roles 67 (3–4): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mallett, Rebecca, and Katherine Runswick-Cole. 2016. The Commodification of Autism: What’s at Stake? In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi, 110–131. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, Emily. 1991. The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16 (3): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Milton, D.E. 2014. Autistic Expertise: A Critical Reflection on the Production of Knowledge in Autism Studies. Autism 18 (7): 794–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moncrieff, J., and S. Timimi. 2010. Is ADHD a Valid Diagnosis in Adults? No. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nadel, Jacqueline, Arnaud Revel, Pierre Andry, and Philippe Gaussier. 2004. Toward Communication: First Imitations in Infants, Low-Functioning Children with Autism and Robots. Interaction Studies 5 (1): 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ochs, Elinor, and Olga Solomon. 2010. Autistic Sociality. Ethos 38 (1): 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oxford English Dictionary (OED). 1995. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. First edited by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler. Ninth Edition. Edited by Della Thompson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Richardson, Kathleen. 2010. Disabling as Mimesis and Alterity: Making Humanoid Robots at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Etnofoor 22 (1): 75–90.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 2015. An Anthropology of Robots and AI: Annihilation Anxiety and Machines. Vol. 20. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2016a. Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 35 (2): 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2016b. Are Sex Robots as Bad as Killing Robots? IoS.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, J. 2014. Participatory Research with Adults with Asperger’s Syndrome: Using Spatial Analysis to Explore How They Make Sense of Their Experience. Doctoral Dissertation, De Montfort University, Leicester.Google Scholar
  54. Runswick-Cole, K. 2016. Understanding This Thing Called Autism. In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi, 19–29. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Runswick-Cole, K., R. Mallett, and S. Timimi. 2016. Introduction. In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi, 7–15. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Sarkadi, Anna, Robert Kristiansson, Frank Oberklaid, and Sven Bremberg. 2008. Fathers’ Involvement and Children’s Developmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. Acta Paediatrica 97 (2): 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sinclair, Thomas Alan. 1962. Aristotle the Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  58. Stawarska, Beata. 2009. Between You and I: Dialogical Phenomenology. Athens: Ohio University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stone, L. 1979. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. Vol. 43. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  60. Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Vol. 6. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Thomson, Mathew. 1998. The Problem of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain C. 1870–1959. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Timimi, S., and B. McCabe. 2016. What Have We Learned About the Science of Autism? In Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality, ed. K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, and S. Timimi, 30–48. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Warwick, Kevin. 2004. I, Cyborg. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wood, Gaby. 2002. Living Dolls: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Richardson
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of TechnologyDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations