Skip to main content

The Tool Generation Challenge for Executable Domain-Specific Modeling Languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations (STAF 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10748))

Abstract

Executable domain-specific modeling languages (xDSMLs) have the potential of bringing major benefits to the development of complex software-intensive systems as they provide abstractions of complex system behaviors and allow for early analyses of that behavior. However, in order to be useful, xDSMLs have to be equipped with model analysis tools supporting domain engineers in comprehending, exploring, and analyzing modeled behaviors. Hand-crafting such tools in an ad hoc manner imposes significant efforts and costs on the development process and is, hence, mostly done for broadly adopted xDSML only. Executable metamodeling approaches seek to overcome this limitation by providing formalisms to define the execution semantics of xDSMLs in a systematic way building the basis for automatically generating model analysis tools. While significant advances towards achieving this vision have been achieved in recent years, there are still many challenges to be solved for generating out-of-the-box analysis support for xDSMLs. In this paper we revisit the tool generation challenge introduced by Bryant et al. [3] seven years ago reflecting on recent achievements and identifying open challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bandener, N., Soltenborn, C., Engels, G.: Extending DMM behavior specifications for visual execution and debugging. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 357–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bousse, E., Corley, J., Combemale, B., Gray, J.G., Baudry, B.: Supporting efficient and advanced omniscient debugging for xDSMLs. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering (SLE 2015), pp. 137–148. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant, B.R., Gray, J., Mernik, M., Clarke, P.J., France, R.B., Karsai, G.: Challenges and directions in formalizing the semantics of modeling languages. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 225–253 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiş, A., Denker, M., Gîrba, T., Nierstrasz, O.: Practical domain-specific debuggers using the moldable debugger framework. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 44(PA), 89–113 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Combemale, B., Crégut, X., Garoche, P.-L., Thirioux, X.: Essay on semantics definition in MDE - an instrumented approach for model verification. J. Softw. 4(9), 943–958 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Durán, F., Moreno-Delgado, A., Orejas, F., Zschaler, S.: Amalgamation of domain specific languages with behaviour. J. Log. Algebr. Methods Program. 86(1), 208–235 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutchinson, J., Whittle, J., Rouncefield, M., Kristoffersen, S.: Empirical assessment of MDE in industry. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2011), pp. 471–480. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kleppe, A.: Software Language Engineering: Creating Domain-Specific Languages Using Metamodels. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kühne, T.: Matters of (meta-)modeling. Softw. Syst. Model. 5(4), 369–385 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindeman, R.T., Kats, L.C., Visser, E.: Declaratively defining domain-specific language debuggers. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE 2011), pp. 127–136. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. MathWorks. Simulink. https://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink.html

  12. Meyers, B., Denil, J., Dávid, I., Vangheluwe, H.: Automated testing support for reactive domain-specific modelling languages. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering (SLE 2016), pp. 181–194. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meyers, B., Deshayes, R., Lucio, L., Syriani, E., Vangheluwe, H., Wimmer, M.: ProMoBox: a framework for generating domain-specific property languages. In: Combemale, B., Pearce, D.J., Barais, O., Vinju, J.J. (eds.) SLE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8706, pp. 1–20. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11245-9_1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Object Management Group: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5, September 2013. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5

  15. Pavletic, D., Voelter, M., Raza, S.A., Kolb, B., Kehrer, T.: Extensible debugger framework for extensible languages. In: de la Puente, J.A., Vardanega, T. (eds.) Ada-Europe 2015. LNCS, vol. 9111, pp. 33–49. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19584-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ráth, I., Vago, D., Varró, D.: Design-time simulation of domain-specific models by incremental pattern matching. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2008), pp. 219–222. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt, D.C.: Model-driven engineering. IEEE Comput. 39, 25–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tikhonova, U.: Reusable specification templates for defining dynamic semantics of DSLs. Softw. Syst. Model. 1–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-017-0590-0

  19. Tikhonova, U., Manders, M., Boudewijns, R.: Visualization of formal specifications for understanding and debugging an industrial DSL. In: Milazzo, P., Varró, D., Wimmer, M. (eds.) STAF 2016. LNCS, vol. 9946, pp. 179–195. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50230-4_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, H., Gray, J., Mernik, M.: Grammar-driven generation of domain-specific language debuggers. J. Softw.: Pract. Exp. 38(10), 1073–1103 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is funded by the Austrian Agency for International Mobility and Cooperation in Education, Science and Research (OeAD) on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW) under the grand number FR 08/2017, and by the French Ministries of Foreign Affairs and International Development (MAEDI) and the French Ministry of Education, Higher Education and Research (MENESR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Mayerhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mayerhofer, T., Combemale, B. (2018). The Tool Generation Challenge for Executable Domain-Specific Modeling Languages. In: Seidl, M., Zschaler, S. (eds) Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations. STAF 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74730-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74730-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74729-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74730-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics