The Metamodel of Heritage Preservation for Medical Big Data

  • Zenon ChaczkoEmail author
  • Lucia Carrion Gordon
  • Wojciech Bożejko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10672)


At present the real challenge of Digital Data Preservation concerns methods of keeping all important attributes of the data and preserving their originality. The key is to keep the living part of the data. It is the essence of the Heritage concept. The Heritage is about the concrete data the concept gives the interconnection to other aspects of the reality. Nowadays the physical value and the aspects of items complete the relevance of information. But the question is what is heritage and which parameters defining the artifact or the information as a heritage? The context and the interpretation of data is the answer. The heritage term is defining as the crucial and central part of the presented research. Big data analytics in healthcare is evolving into a promising field for providing insight from very large data sets and improving outcomes while reducing costs.


Data Preservation Digital Heritage Metamodel Ontology 


  1. 1.
    Bożejko, W., Hejducki, Z., Wodecki, M.: Applying metaheuristic strategies in construction projects management. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 18(5), 621–630 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bożejko, W., Pempera, J., Smutnicki, C.: Parallel tabu search algorithm for the hybrid flow shop problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 65, 466–474 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nasir, S.A., Noor, N.L.M.: Integrating ontology-based approach in knowledge management system (KMS): construction of batik heritage ontology. In: Science and Social Research (CSSR), pp. 674–679 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thalmann, S., Seeber, I., Maier, R., Peinl, R., Pawlowski, J.M., Hetmank, L., Kruse, P., Bick, M.: Ontology-based standardization on knowledge exchange in social knowledge management environments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Graz, Austria, pp. 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strodl, S., Becker, C., Neumayer, R., Rauber, A.: How to choose a digital preservation strategy: evaluating a preservation planning procedure. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon, L., Chaczko, Z.: Digital patterns for heritage and data preservation standards. In: Borowik, G., Chaczko, Z., Jacak, W., Łuba, T. (eds.) Computational Intelligence and Efficiency in Engineering Systems. SCI, vol. 595, pp. 47–59. Springer, Cham (2015). Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Challa, S., Gulrez, T., Chaczko, Z., Paranesha, T.N.: Opportunistic information fusion: a new paradigm for next generation networked sensing systems. In: 8th International Conference on Information Fusion, vol. 1, pp. 720–727 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCay-Peet, L.: Investigating work-related serendipity, what influences it, and how it may be facilitated in digital environments. Ph.D. thesis, Dalhausie University (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raghupathi, W.: Data mining in health care. In: Kudyba, S. (ed.) Healthcare Informatics: Improving Efficiency and Productivity, pp. 211–223 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burghard, C.: Big data and analytics key to accountable care success, White paper, IDC Health Insights, pp. 1–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dembosky, A.: Data prescription for better healthcare. Financ. Times 11(12), 19 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feldman, B., Martin, E.M., Skotnes, T.: Big Data in Healthcare Hype and Hope, October 2012. Dr. Bonnie 360 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fernandes, L., O’Connor, M., Weaver, V.: Big data, bigger outcomes. J. AHIMA 83(10), 38–43 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raghupathi, W., Kesh, S.: Interoperable electronic health records design: towards a service-oriented architecture. e-Serv. J. 5, 39–57 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raghupathi, W., Raghupathi, V.: Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 2, 3 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smutnicki, C., Bożejko, W.: Parallel and distributed metaheuristics. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds.) EUROCAST 2015. LNCS, vol. 9520, pp. 72–79. Springer, Cham (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zenon Chaczko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lucia Carrion Gordon
    • 1
  • Wojciech Bożejko
    • 2
  1. 1.FEIT Faculty of Engineering and ITUTS University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Automatics, Mechatronics and Control Systems, Faculty of ElectronicsWrocław University of Science and TechnologyWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations