Skip to main content

Static and Dynamic Approaches on the Low-Rise RC Frames Capacity Evaluation and Damage Quantification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 809 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Natural Hazards ((SPRINGERNAT))

Abstract

The seismic capacity evaluation is a key-tool for practitioners in the standard post-design stage of building structures. This also serves as a major component for performing higher level analysis modules as seismic vulnerability analysis, risk analysis, loss estimation and resilience analysis. The seismic capacity of a structure is dependent of the applied load pattern as well as of nonlinear modelling of members. The paper examines the dependency of capacity curve parameters of typical low-rise regular reinforced concrete frames as a large proportion from actual building stock in Bucharest, using both nonlinear static and dynamic analysis approaches as well as discrete and distributed available plasticity models for reinforced concrete members. The sensitivity analysis of global seismic damage index based on the probabilistic approach using HAZUS methodology (2007) is then performed. A more accurate prediction of structural capacity in conjunction with integrated tools for the assessment of the damage states up to progressive collapse associated to various earthquake scenarios and time-domain analysis approach would truly lead implementing a real performance-based seismic design into practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Advantages and limitations of force-based adaptive and non-adaptive pushover procedures. J Earthq Eng 8(4):497–522

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC-40 report, vols 1 and 2. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California

    Google Scholar 

  • CEB (1996) RC frames under earthquake loading. State of the Art report. Thomas Thelford. ISBN 072772085 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:561–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS (2001) Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12(1):51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-440 (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic procedures, ATC-55 Draft, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SA (1998) The capacity spectrum method as a tool for seismic design. In: Proceedings of the 11th european conference on earthquake engineering, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS-MH 2.1 (2007) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model estimates earthquake damage and loss to buildings. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Iancovici M (2001) The assessment of the reinforced concrete building structures seismic performance based on the elements performance. Bull Int Inst Seismolog Earthq Eng 239–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Iancovici M, Fukuyama H, Kusunoki K (2002) The assessment of the reinforced concrete building structures based on the seismic performance concept. Fifth international congress on advances in civil engineering, Turkey, vol 1, pp 555–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsanos E, Sextos A, Manolis G (2010) Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer S (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall Inc, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete, J Struct Engi 114(8):1804–1826

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark K (1976) Nonlinear dynamic response of reinforced concrete frames. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (Res. Rep. R76-38)

    Google Scholar 

  • P100-1 (2013) Code for seismic design—part I—design prescriptions for buildings. Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Păunescu VA (2013) Abordări statice și dinamice în determinarea curbei de capacitate a structurilor. Lucrare de disertatie, Universitatea Tehnică de Constructii Bucuresti (in Romanian), p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietra D (2008) Evaluation of pushover procedures for the seismic design of buildings. M.Sc. Thesis, Rose School, Pavia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements. J Struct Eng ASCE 132(2):244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SeismoStruct (2016) A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Available online at www.seismosoft.com

  • Tagel-Din H, Meguro K (2000) Applied element method for simulation of nonlinear materials: theory and application for RC structures. Jpn Soc Civil Eng (JSCE) 17(2):137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagel-Din H, Meguro K (2001) Applied element simulation of RC structures under cyclic loading. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(11):137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of the research presented in the paper was supported through the Seismic Risk Evaluation Center (CCERS) of Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest (UTCB) by the RO-RISK Project SIPOCA 30/2016 funded by the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration and co-funded by the European Social Fund. The authors highly acknowledge this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihail Iancovici .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pǎunescu, VA., Iancovici, M. (2018). Static and Dynamic Approaches on the Low-Rise RC Frames Capacity Evaluation and Damage Quantification. In: Vacareanu, R., Ionescu, C. (eds) Seismic Hazard and Risk Assessment. Springer Natural Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74724-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics