Advertisement

Introduction: Blurring Boundaries

  • Phindezwa MnyakaEmail author
  • Catriona Ida Macleod
Chapter
  • 621 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter introduces the section on blurring boundaries in research. The chapters within this section unpack the ethical dilemmas that researchers negotiate when they find themselves stepping outside their roles as researchers in the field. Research encounters presuppose particular boundaries, depending on the methodology employed and the research questions posed. However, participants may identify researchers differently, compelling them to respond in unanticipated ways as possibly therapists, clinicians, interlocutors, and activists. Collectively, the authors of the chapters in this section explore the ethical implications of blurring such boundaries. They unpack the significance of various forms of intimacies that may emerge while undertaking research, how researchers are positioned as agents of social change, and how researchers negotiate their statuses as insiders and outsiders in fieldwork.

References

  1. Anyan, F. (2014). The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: A focus on qualitative research interview. The Qualitative Report, 18(18), 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Ezzy, D. (2010). Qualitative interviewing as an embodied emotional performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(3), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Geissler, P. W., Kelly, A., Imoukhuede, B., & Pool, R. (2008). ‘He is now like a brother, I can even give him some blood’—Relational ethics and material exchanges in a malaria vaccine ‘trial community’ in The Gambia. Social Science & Medicine, 67(5), 696–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hiller, A. J., & Vears, D. F. (2016). Reflexivity and the clinician-researcher: Managing participant misconceptions. Qualitative Research Journal, 16(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hubbard, G., Backett-Milburn, K., & Kemmer, D. (2001). Working with emotion: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Maxey, I. (1999). Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research. Area, 31(3), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mendenhall, A. N. (2007). Switching hats: Transitioning from the role of clinician to the role of researcher in social work doctoral education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27(3–4), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Molyneux, S., & Geissler, P. W. (2008). Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 67(5), 685–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Perry, C., Thurston, M., & Green, K. (2004). Involvement and detachment in researching sexuality: Reflections on the process of semistructured interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rabe, M. (2003). Revisiting ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’ as social researchers. African Sociological Review/Revue Africaine de Sociologie, 7(2), 149–161.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, M. (2014). ‘Being useful’ after the Ivory Tower: combining research and activism with the Brixton pound. Area, 46(3), 228–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wallace, N. (2005). From clinician to researcher: The challenges and rewards. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 26(1), 46–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Walshaw, M. (2010). The performance of self in the art of research. Educational Insights, 13(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa
  2. 2.Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction, Department of PsychologyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations