Skip to main content

Subjects and Objects: An Ethic of Representing the Other

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research

Abstract

In this chapter I reflect on the challenges and paradoxes of representing the other in critical research. Particular attention is given to implicit configurations of subject/object or self/other in approaches informed by both rational/theoretical and caring/humanistic methodologies. Drawing on an extended qualitative study of ten women with traumatic brain injury, I explore the contradictory and often latent assumptions about researcher subjectivity and the possibility and meaning of knowing the object/other of research either through unity or through distance. Rather than resolving the ethical dilemmas and dangers posed by a field and a researcher/subject caught up in the will to know, the chapter concludes by pointing to the implications of ethical practice grounded in the fragmentary and unstable nature of the researcher as a “virtual self”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ethics clearance obtained from University of Illinois Urban-Champaign (UIUC) (first in 1996, with renewals for eight subsequent years); at Carle Hospital in Urbana, Illinois (1996); and at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (1996 and 1998).

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corker, M. (1999). Differences, conflations, and foundations: The limits to “accurate” theoretical representations of disabled people’s experience? Disability & Society, 14(5), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimp, D. (1992). Portraits of people with AIDS. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (1997). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harewood, S. (2009). Metaphor and the work of cultural studies. Policy Futures in Education, 7(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2009.7.2.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, A. (2008). Derrida vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving deconstruction and psychoanalysis. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kogler, H. -H. (1999). The power of dialogue: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (P. Hendrickson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1979). Quatre concepts fundamentaux de la psychoanalytique. Paris: Editions de Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity (Alfonso Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C., & Grossberg, L. (Eds.). (1988). Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & Sparkes, C. (2008). Narrative and its potential contributions to disability studies. Disability & Society, 23(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701725542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. E. (2014). Living with brain injury: Narrative, community & women’s renegotiation of identity. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, C. (2000). Occidentalism: Modernity and subjectivity. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yearly, L. (1991). Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of virtue and concepts of courage. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Stewart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stewart, E. (2018). Subjects and Objects: An Ethic of Representing the Other. In: Macleod, C., Marx, J., Mnyaka, P., Treharne, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics