Skip to main content

Subjects and Objects: An Ethic of Representing the Other

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research

Abstract

In this chapter I reflect on the challenges and paradoxes of representing the other in critical research. Particular attention is given to implicit configurations of subject/object or self/other in approaches informed by both rational/theoretical and caring/humanistic methodologies. Drawing on an extended qualitative study of ten women with traumatic brain injury, I explore the contradictory and often latent assumptions about researcher subjectivity and the possibility and meaning of knowing the object/other of research either through unity or through distance. Rather than resolving the ethical dilemmas and dangers posed by a field and a researcher/subject caught up in the will to know, the chapter concludes by pointing to the implications of ethical practice grounded in the fragmentary and unstable nature of the researcher as a “virtual self”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ethics clearance obtained from University of Illinois Urban-Champaign (UIUC) (first in 1996, with renewals for eight subsequent years); at Carle Hospital in Urbana, Illinois (1996); and at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (1996 and 1998).

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corker, M. (1999). Differences, conflations, and foundations: The limits to “accurate” theoretical representations of disabled people’s experience? Disability & Society, 14(5), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimp, D. (1992). Portraits of people with AIDS. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (1997). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harewood, S. (2009). Metaphor and the work of cultural studies. Policy Futures in Education, 7(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2009.7.2.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, A. (2008). Derrida vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving deconstruction and psychoanalysis. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kogler, H. -H. (1999). The power of dialogue: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (P. Hendrickson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1979). Quatre concepts fundamentaux de la psychoanalytique. Paris: Editions de Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity (Alfonso Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C., & Grossberg, L. (Eds.). (1988). Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & Sparkes, C. (2008). Narrative and its potential contributions to disability studies. Disability & Society, 23(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701725542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. E. (2014). Living with brain injury: Narrative, community & women’s renegotiation of identity. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, C. (2000). Occidentalism: Modernity and subjectivity. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yearly, L. (1991). Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of virtue and concepts of courage. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Stewart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stewart, E. (2018). Subjects and Objects: An Ethic of Representing the Other. In: Macleod, C., Marx, J., Mnyaka, P., Treharne, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics