Advertisement

The Ethics of Covert Ethnographic Research

  • Marco MarzanoEmail author
Chapter
  • 695 Downloads

Abstract

Covert ethnographic research is a method in which the researchers do not reveal the true purpose of their presence among the individuals they are observing. In settings where covert research is not restricted by ethics regulations, the choice between masking and revealing one’s identity does not depend solely on the will of the researcher. I illustrate this using three studies in which I conducted covert research within a hospital and two religious organisations. The chapter concludes by describing the factors which urge a resumption of covert research. This may happen only if a strictly deontological perspective is rejected in favour of one that centres on social critique and the difficult search for truth about the most invisible and sensitive aspects of our social lives.

Keywords

Covert Research Cancer Ward Parrhesia fieldField Palliative Care Ward 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrera, D., & Simpson, B. (2012). Much ado about deception: Consequences of deceiving research participants in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(3), 383–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchamp, T., Faden, R., Wallace, J., & Walters, L. (Eds.). (1982). Ethical issues in social science research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  5. Bulmer, M. (1982). When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvey, D. (2008). The art and politics of covert research: Doing situated ethics in the Field. Sociology, 42(5), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvey, D. (2017). Covert research: The art, politics and ethics of undercover fieldwork. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalton, M. (1959). Men who manage. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Douglas, J. D. (1976). Investigative social research: Individual and team field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Erikson, K. T. (1967). A comment on disguised observation in sociology. Social Problems, 14(4), 366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ferdinand, J., Pearson, G., Rowe, M., & Worthington, F. (2007). A different kind of ethics. Ethnography, 8(4), 519–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138107083566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (2001). In J. Pearson (Ed.), Fearless speech. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  15. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goode, E. (1996). The ethics of deception in social research: A case study. Qualitative Sociology, 19(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research: Controversies and contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrera, C. D. (1999). Two arguments for covert methods in social research. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00331.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Homan, R. (1980). The ethics of covert methods. The British Journal of Sociology, 31(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/590062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Homan, R. (1991). The ethics of social research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Iphofen, R. (2006). Ethical scrutiny. Times Higher Education Supplement 8 September. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/letters/ethical-scrutiny/205246.article
  24. Landsberger, H. A. (1958). Hawthorne revisited: Management and the worker, its critics, and developments in human relations industry. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lauder, M. A. (2003). Covert participant observation of a deviant community: Justifying the use of deception. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 18(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353790032000067518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lugosi, P. (2006). Between overt and covert research: Concealment and disclosure in an ethnographic study of commercial hospitality. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405282801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marzano, M. (2004). Scene finali: Morire di cancro in Italia. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  28. Marzano, M. (2007). Informed consent, deception, and research freedom in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marzano, M. (2009). Cattolicesimo magico: Un’indagine etnografica. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  30. Marzano, M. (2012a). Informed consent. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 443–456). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Marzano, M. (2012b). Ethics and social conflict: A framework for social research. In K. Love (Ed.), Ethics in social research (pp. 73–90). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marzano, M. (2012c). Quel che resta dei cattolici. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  33. Pool, R. (1995). Breaking the conspiracy of silence: Some reflections on fieldwork and new modes of ethnographic writing. In K. Geuijen, D. Raven, & J. de Wolf (Eds.), Post-modernism and anthropology: Theory and practice (pp. 111–130). Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  34. Punch, M. (1986). The politics and ethics of fieldwork. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179(4070), 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2004). Parts unknown: Undercover ethnography of the organs-trafficking underworld. Ethnography, 5(1), 29–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138104041588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2005). The last commodity: Post-human ethics and the global traffic in ‘fresh’ organs. In A. Ong & S. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 145–167). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Spicker, P. (2011). Ethical covert research. Sociology, 45(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tysome, T. (2006). Ethics guards are stifling creativity. Times Higher Education Supplement 25 August. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/ethics-guards-are-stifling-creativity/204946.article
  40. Vidich, A., & Bensman, J. (1964). The Springdale case: Academic bureaucrats and sensitive townspeople. In A. Vidich, J. Bensman, & M. Stein (Eds.), Reflections on community studies (pp. 313–349). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli studi di BergamoBergamoItalia

Personalised recommendations