Advertisement

When Ethical Procedures Can’t Do the Job: Ethical Dilemmas of Undertaking Critical Organisational Ethnographies in Social and Health Research

  • Jason BantjesEmail author
  • Leslie Swartz
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we describe our experience of undertaking critical organisational ethnography in schools and healthcare settings to illustrate how such work is a political endeavour and ethical minefield of potential conflicts and dilemmas. We demonstrate how our responsibility to protect research participants has been complicated by our responsibility to accurately describe what is observed. We discuss the challenges we have faced to balance ‘social good’ against the interests and rights of individuals inserted into and reproducing institutions. Critical ethnographies serve as powerful instruments to disrupt practices and expose injustices. As such, they have a special relevance to addressing fundamental questions about transformation of institutions in unequal and oppressive societies, but their deeply political nature brings ethical challenges which are not always easy to resolve.

Keywords

Organizational Ethnography Protect Research Participants Ethnographic Ethnography Research harmHarm fieldField 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this work was in part provided by a Career Development Award from the South African Medical Research Council, awarded to Jason Bantjes.

References

  1. Adams, T. (2006). Seeking father: Relationally reframing a troubled love story. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406288607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bantjes, J., Nel, A., Louw, K. A., Frenkel, L., Benjamin, E., & Lewis, I. (2016). ‘This place is making me more depressed’: The organisation of care for suicide attempters in a South African hospital. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316628744
  3. Bantjes, J., & Nieuwoudt, J. (2011). A group-analytic formulation of an incident of disruptive behaviour in a school. Psycho-analytic Psychotherapy in South Africa, 19(2), 30–65.Google Scholar
  4. Bantjes, J., & Nieuwoudt, J. (2014). Masculinity and mayhem: The performance of gender in a South African boys’ school. Men and Masculinities, 17(4), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14539964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergum, V. (2004). Relational ethics for nursing. In J. Storch, P. Rodney, & R. Starzomski (Eds.), Toward a moral horizon: Nursing ethics for leadership and practice (pp. 485–503). Toronto: Pearson Education Canada.Google Scholar
  6. Bergum, V., & Dossetor, J. B. (2005). Relational ethics: The full meaning of respect. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  7. Bosk, C. L., & De Vries, R. G. (2004). Bureaucracies of mass deception: Institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204266913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, M. (2006). Man-to-man: A body talk between male friends. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405282796 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carter, S. (2002). How much subjectivity is needed to understand our lives objectively? Qualitative Health Research, 12(9), 1184–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238244 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chari, S., & Donner, H. (2010). Ethnographies of activism: A critical introduction. Cultural Dynamics, 22(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374010380887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etherington, K. (2005). Writing trauma stories for research. Lapidus Quarterly, 1(2), 25–31.Google Scholar
  14. Gadow, S. (1999). Relational narrative: The postmodern turn in nursing ethics. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 13(1), 57–70.Google Scholar
  15. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin, D., Pope, C., Mort, M., & Smith, A. (2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302250723 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kiesinger, C. (2002). My father’s shoes: The therapeutic value of narrative reframing. In A. P. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 95–114). New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lincoln, Y. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacDonald, H. (2007). Relational ethics and advocacy in nursing: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Madison, D. S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics, performance. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Marzano, M. (2007). Informed consent, deception, and research freedom in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayosi, B. M., Lawn, J. E., van Niekerk, A., Bradshaw, D., Abdool Karim, S. S., & Coovadia, H. M. (2012). Health in South Africa: Changes and challenges since 2009. The Lancet, 380(9858), 2029–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61814-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Noddings, N. (1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/443894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perry, J. (2001). Sibling relationships and care of parents: Deconstructing memoirs and personal narratives. PhD dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.Google Scholar
  27. Rambo, C. (2007). Handing IRB an unloaded gun. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reeves, S., Peller, J., Goldman, J., & Kitto, S. (2013). Ethnography in qualitative educational research: AMEE Guide No. 80. Medical Teacher, 35(8), e1365–e1379. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.804977 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Robinson, W. (2003). Betrayal: The crisis in the Catholic Church. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  30. Rosen, M. (1991). Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography. Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00268.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savage, J. (2000). Ethnography and health care. British Medical Journal, 321(7273), 1400–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slattery, P., & Rapp, D. (2003). Ethics and the foundations of education: Teaching convictions in a postmodern world. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  33. Yanow, D., Ybema, S., & van Hutst, M. (2012). Practising organizational ethnography. In G. Syman & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 331–350). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations