Advertisement

Challenging Methodological and Ethical Conventions to Facilitate Research That Is Responsive to People with Learning Disabilities

  • Brigit Mirfin-VeitchEmail author
  • Jenny Conder
  • Gareth J. Treharne
  • Leigh Hale
  • Georgina Richardson
Chapter
  • 628 Downloads

Abstract

People with learning disabilities continue to be denied the opportunity to be actively engaged in the production of research. In this chapter, we draw on two studies in which we attempted to be inclusive of people with learning disabilities. The first study explored experiences of women with learning disabilities in relation to mental health; the second study delivered an intervention designed to reduce falls for people with learning disabilities. We address four aspects of the research process in both studies that highlighted the importance of ethical considerations that take into account inclusivity, recruitment, informed consent, communicating research-related tasks, and interview approaches. We outline how relational ethics should be central to efforts to be responsive in research that is inclusive of people with learning disabilities.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Lottery Grants Board, Lottery Health Committee, and the Health Research Council who funded respectively the two studies referred to in this chapter. Finally, we express our appreciation for the contributions of all those people who contributed to the research described here in a myriad of different ways.

References

  1. Bigby, C., & Frawley, P. (2010). Reflections on doing inclusive research in the ‘Making Life Good in the Community’ study. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 35(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668251003716425 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Conder, J. A., Mirfin-Veitch, B. F., & Gates, S. (2015). Risk and resilience factors in the mental health and well-being of women with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28(6), 572–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, C., Clemson, L., Stancliffe, R., Durvasula, S., & Sherrington, C. (2010). Incidence of and risk factors for falls amongst adults with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(12), 1054–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Enkelaar, L., Smulders, E., van Scrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H., Geurts, A., & Weerdesteyn, V. (2012). A review of balance and gait capacities in relation to persons with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frankena, T. K., Naaldenberg, J., Cardol, M., Meijering, J. V., Leusink, G., & van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H. M. J. (2016). Exploring academics’ views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: A modified Delphi study. BMJ Open, 6(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2005). Epistemological journeys in participatory action research: Alliances between community psychology and disability studies. Disability & Society, 20(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500059077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffin, T., & Balandin, S. (2004). Ethical research involving people with intellectual disabilities. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, & T. Parmenter (Eds.), Applied research in intellectual disabilities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Gunzenhauser, M. (2006). A moral epistemology of knowing subjects: Theorising a relational turn for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hale, L. A., Mirfin-Veitch, B. F., & Treharne, G. J. (2016). Prevention of falls for adults with intellectual disability (PROFAID): A feasibility study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(1), 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halse, C., & Honey, A. (2007). Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourse. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollomotz, A. (2017). Successful interviews with people with intellectual disability. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117713810 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lahman, M., Geist, M., Rodriguez, K., Graglia, P., & DeRoche, K. (2011). Culturally responsive relational reflexive ethics in research: The three rs. Quality and Quantity International Journal of Methodology, 45, 1397–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ouellette-Kunntz, H., Lunsky, Y., Lysaght, R., Martin, L., & Saaltink, R. (2013). Partnering in the field of intellectual/developmental disabilities—Lessons for participant recruitment. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 19(2), 25–35.Google Scholar
  16. Øye, C., Øvre Sorensen, N., & Glasdam, S. (2016). Qualitative research ethics on the spot: Not only on the desktop. Nursing Ethics, 23(4), 455–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pal, J., Hale, L., Mirfin-Veitch, B., & Claydon, L. (2014). Injuries and falls among adults with intellectual disability: A prospective New Zealand cohort study. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Townson, L., Macauley, S., Harkness, E., Chapman, R., Docherty, A., Dias, J., … McNulty, N. (2004). We are all in the same boat: Doing people-led research. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00282.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Walmsley, J. (2001). Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society, 16(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120035807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walmsley, J., & Johnson, K. (2003). Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: Past, present and futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigit Mirfin-Veitch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jenny Conder
    • 2
  • Gareth J. Treharne
    • 2
  • Leigh Hale
    • 2
  • Georgina Richardson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Donald Beasley InstituteDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations