Advertisement

Ethical Research and the Policing of Masculinity: Experiences of a Male Researcher Doing Ethnography with Young School Children

  • Emmanuel MayezaEmail author
Chapter
  • 608 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter explores the normative conceptions of children as vulnerable and lacking agency that underpin ethics review. Drawing on my ethnographic research with young school children, I discuss how peer feedback and the ethics review process positioned me as a potential threat to both the children and the person responsible for protecting them. It also left me ill-prepared to respond to moments in the field when the children wished to assert their agency. Although it is important to be cognisant of salient gender dynamics, I argue that we should not be distracted from other important ethics considerations such as identifying those moments when children wish to challenge some aspect of the research process and to know how to respond appropriately.

References

  1. Alderson, P. (2004). Ethics. In S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, & C. Robinson (Eds.), Doing research with children and young people (pp. 97–112). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bhana, D. (2012). Girls are not free: In and out of the South African school. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(2), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhana, D. (2016). Childhood sexuality and AIDS education: The price of innocence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bhana, D., & Moosa, S. (2016). Failing to attract males in foundation phase teaching: An issue of masculinities. Gender & Education, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1105934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruzzese, J. M., & Fisher, C. (2003). Assessing and enhancing the research consent capacity of children and youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0701_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crow, G., Wiles, R., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2006). Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Research Methodology, 9(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Social Development, Department of Women, Children & People with Disabilities, UNICEF. (2012). Violence against children in South Africa. Pretoria: DSD, DWCPD, UNICEF. Retrieved June 6, 2017, from http://www.cjcp.org.za/uploads/2/7/8/4/27845461/vac_final_summary_low_res.pdf
  8. Dixon, K. (2011). Literacy, power, and the schooled body: Learning in time and space. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dockett, S., Einarsdottir, J., & Perry, B. (2012). Young children’s decisions about research participation: Opting out. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.715405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2011). Researching with young children: Seeking assent. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9084-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, D. (1998). Are you a girl or are you a teacher? The ‘least adult’ role in research about gender and sexuality in a primary school. In G. Walford (Ed.), Doing research about education (pp. 27–41). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ford, K., Sankey, J., & Crisp, J. (2007). Development of children’s assent documents using a child-centred approach. Journal of Child Health Care, 11(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493507073058 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2003). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary society. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  14. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson, T., & Klinth, R. (2008). Caring fathers: The ideology of gender equality and masculine positions. Men & Masculinities, 11(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06291899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindeke, L. L., Hauck, M. R., & Tanner, M. (2000). Practical issues in obtaining child assent for research. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children & Families, 15(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1053/jn.2000.5447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacNaughton, G. (2000). Rethinking gender in early childhood education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Mandell, N. (1988). The least-adult role in studying children. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16(4), 433–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241688164002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, B. (2011). Children at play: Learning gender in the early years. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  20. Mayeza, E. (2016). Girls don’t play soccer: Children policing gender on the playground in a township primary school in South Africa. Gender and Education, 29(4), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1187262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayeza, E. (2017). It’s not right for boys to play with dolls: Young children constructing and policing gender during ‘free play’ in a South African classroom. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1290584
  22. Mayeza, E., & Bhana, D. (2017). Addressing gender violence among children in the early years of schooling: Insights from teachers in a South African primary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2017.1319288
  23. Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (2009). The handbook of social research ethics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrell, R., & Jewkes, R. (2011). Carework and caring: A path to gender equitable practices among men in South Africa? International Journal for Equity in Health, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrow, V. (1999). If you were a teacher, it would be harder to talk to you: Reflections on qualitative research with children in school. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(4), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morrow, V. (2001). Using qualitative methods to elicit young people’s perspectives on their environments: Some ideas for community health initiatives. Health Education Research, 16(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.3.255 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliver, P. (2010). The student’s guide to research ethics. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pattman, R. (2013). Learning from the learners about sexuality in a participatory interview in a South African school. In D. A. Francis (Ed.), Sexuality, society, and pedagogy (pp. 119–132). Bloemfontein: Sun Media.Google Scholar
  29. Phelan, S. K., & Kinsella, E. A. (2013). Picture this… safety, dignity, and voice—Ethical research children: Practical considerations for the reflexive researcher. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412462987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pyle, A., & Danniels, E. (2016). Using a picture book to gain assent in research with young children. Early Child Development & Care, 186(9), 1438–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1100175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratele, K. (2015). Working through resistance in engaging boys and men towards gender equality and progressive masculinities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1048527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Renold, E. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities: Exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. Oxon: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  33. Shore, N., Brazauskas, R., Drew, E., Wong, K. A., Moy, L., Baden, A. G., … Seifer, S. D. (2011). Understanding community-based processes for research ethics review: A national study. American Journal of Public Health, 101(1), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.194340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strydom, H. (2005). Ethical aspects of research in the social sciences and human service professions. In A. S. De Vos (Ed.), Research at grassroots: For the social science and human service professions (pp. 113–130). Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  35. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Troman, G. (2000). Does gender make a difference? A male researcher’s reflexive account of gendered fieldwork relations in ethnographic work on stress in teaching. In G. Walford & C. Hudson (Eds.), Genders and sexualities in educational ethnography (pp. 209–223). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van den Hoonaard, W., & Hamilton, A. (2016). The ethics rupture: Exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  38. Vitiello, B. (2003). Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving children and adolescents. Psychopharmacology, 171(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1400-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Warin, J., & Gannerud, E. (2014). Gender, teaching and care: A comparative global conversation. Gender & Education, 26(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.928023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations