Cripping the Ethics of Disability Arts Research

  • Carla RiceEmail author
  • Andrea LaMarre
  • Roxanne Mykitiuk


The use of multimedia story-making and narrative-based drama in disability research raises conventional ethical issues of informed consent, anonymity, and confidentiality. In this chapter, we explore unique issues that arise when working with non-normatively embodied/enminded participants in a collaborative way, using arts-based mediums that transgress boundaries of anonymity and privacy, and call for difference-tailored consent processes. We identify unique ethical issues/practices arising out of our research with Re•Vision, a research-creation centre that uses the power of the arts to dismantle stereotypical understandings of mind-body difference that create barriers to healthcare. Drawing on Re•Vision’s arts research, we map ethical conditions under which participants/collaborators/artists create their stories, and how curation of multimedia stories and drama gives rise to an ethics of voice and bearing witness.



We thank our funding organisations, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) for supporting this research. We also acknowledge the School of Disability Studies at Ryerson University for the generous donation of accessible workshop space and Tangled Art + Disability, whose funding assisted us in pushing the boundaries of the multimedia storytelling genre. We also thank the artists and storytellers who participated in our many workshops and performances held throughout the province of Ontario.


  1. Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Carter, K., Graham, H., Hayward, P., Henry, A., & Strachan, A. (2013). Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Science, 8(3), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research. Disability & Society , 18(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benmayor, R. (2008). Digital storytelling as a signature pedagogy for the New Humanities. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blodgett, L. J., Boyer, W., & Turk, E. (2005). “No thank you, not today”: Supporting ethical and professional relationships in large qualitative studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), 35.Google Scholar
  5. Boydell, K. M. (2011). Making sense of collective events: the co-creation of a research-based dance. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 5.Google Scholar
  6. Boydell, K. M., Gladstone, B. M., Volpe, T., Allemang, B., & Stasiulis, E. (2012). The production and dissemination of knowledge: A scoping review of arts-based health research., 13(1), 32.
  7. Boydell, K. M., Volpe, T., Cox, S., Katz, A., Dow, R., Brunger, F., … Wong, L. (2012). Ethical challenges in arts-based health research International Journal of the Creative Arts in Interprofessional Practice, 11.
  8. Chandler, E., Rice, C., Changfoot, N., LaMarre, A., Mykitiuk, R. & Mundel, I. (forthcoming) Cultivating disability arts in Ontario. Continuum: Journal of Cultural and Media Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Dion, S. D. (2009). Braiding histories: Learning from aboriginal peoples’ experiences and perspectives. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  10. Finley, S. (2014). An introduction to critical arts-based research demonstrating methodologies and practices of a radical ethical aesthetic. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(6), 531–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garland-Thomson, R. (2007). Shape structures story: Fresh and feisty stories about disability. Narrative, 15(1), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garland-Thomson, R. (2012). The case for conserving disability. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(3), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gay, J. with Fraser, M. (2008). Why does representation matter? in J. Dodd, R. Sandell, D. Jolly, & C. Jones (Eds.), Rethinking disability representations in museums and galleries. Leicester: University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, B. H., Cooke, R. A., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1978). Research involving human subjects. Science, 201(4361), 1094–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., Becker, A. B., Allen, A., & Guzman, J. R. (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 56–73). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Lafrenière, D., Cox, S. M., Belliveau, G., & Lea, G. W. (2013). Performing the human subject: Arts-based knowledge dissemination in health research. Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 3(3), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LaMarre, A., & Rice, C. (2016). Embodying critical and corporeal methodology: Digital storytelling with young women in eating disorder recovery. Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Sozialforschung, 17(2), 7.Google Scholar
  18. Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Milling, J., & Heddon, D. (2005). Devising performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Mykitiuk, R., Chaplick, A., & Rice, C. (2015). Beyond normative ethics: Ethics of arts-based disability research. Ethics, Medicine & Public Health, 1, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Obrist, H. U. (2014). Sharp tongue, loose lips, open eyes, ears to the ground. London: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reid J. (2015, May 5) Cripping the arts: It’s about time. Canadian Art.
  23. Rice, C. (2014). Becoming women: The embodied self in image culture. Toronto: UT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rice, C., Chandler, E., & Changfoot, N. (2016). Imagining otherwise: The ephemeral spaces of envisioning new meanings. In C. Kelly & M. Orsini (Eds.), Mobilizing metaphor: Art, culture and disability activism in Canada (pp. 54–75). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rice, C., Chandler, E., Harrison, E., Liddiard, K., & Ferrari, M. (2015). Project Re•Vision: Disability at the edges of representation. Disability & Society, 30(4), 513–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rice, C., Chandler, E., Liddiard, K., Rinaldi, J., & Harrison, E. (2016). The pedagogical possibilities for unruly bodies. Gender & Education. Advanced online publication.
  27. Rice, C., Chandler, E., Rinaldi, J., Liddiard, K., Changfoot, N., … Mundel, I. (2017). Imagining disability futurities. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 32(2), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rice, C. & Mundel, I. (forthcoming). Multimedia storytelling methodology: Notes on access and inclusion in neoliberal times. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies Google Scholar
  29. Rinaldi, J., Rice, C., LaMarre, A., Pendleton Jiménez, K., Harrison, E., Friedman, M., … Tidgwell, T. (2016). “Through Thick and Thin”: Storying queer women’s experiences of taking up and resisting idealized body images and expected body management practices. Psychology of Sexualities Review (PoSR), 7(2), 63–77.Google Scholar
  30. Sandell, R., Dodd, J., & Garland-Thompson, R. (2010). Re-presenting disability: Activism and agency in the museum. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Scantlebury, K. (2005). Maintaining ethical and professional relationships in large qualitative studies: A Quixotic ideal? Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Sozialforschung, 6(3), 39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations