Introduction: The Politics of Anonymity and Confidentiality
- 684 Downloads
Ethics committees standardly require that the researchers address questions concerning anonymity and confidentiality. The conventional practice is to ensure that participants’ names and identifying details are expunged from public records of the research and that high levels of confidentiality of data are maintained in the research process. In this introduction, we outline how authors of chapters in this section ask questions concerning these imperatives, including circumstances where participants actively want their identity revealed and their voice heard or when anonymising might not be possible or may further disadvantage marginalised populations. We explore the argument made by authors that the automatic anonymising of data and the imposition of confidentiality can constrain ethical conduct.
- van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2003). Is anonymity an artifact in ethnographic research? Journal of Academic Ethics, 1(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000006919.58804.4c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tilley, L., & Woodthorpe, K. (2011). Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research, 11(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110394073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tolich, M. (2004). Internal confidentiality: When confidentiality assurances fail relational informants. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015546.20441.4a CrossRefGoogle Scholar