Blurring Boundaries Between Researcher and Participant: The Ethical Use of a Psychoanalytically Informed Research Interview
- 614 Downloads
This chapter is a reflection on remaining ethical when collecting participant information using the psychoanalytically informed research interview. The specific ethical tensions include when participants relate to researchers as confidants and advice-givers, and how to approach such emotionally demanding work. The author shares how she attempted to ethically manage encounters with participants using examples from her study on maternal subjectivity in which able-bodied mothers raising visibly, physically disabled children were interviewed. The author also has a visible physical disability, as does her daughter. Unexpectedly, participants turned the interview relationship around, asking her questions as they shared certain particularities and experiences. The researcher describes how she ethically managed this blurring of roles. She argues for constant psychoanalytic-researcher reflexivity to manage these complex emotional encounters.
Parts of this chapter were originally published in:
Harvey, C. (2017). The intricate process of psychoanalytic research: encountering the intersubjective experience of the researcher-participant relationship. British Journal of Psychotherapy 33(3), 312–327. Thanks to the British Journal of Psychotherapy for agreeing to my using some of the material in this chapter.
- Freud, S. (1910/1953). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed & Trans). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (vol. XI). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1912/1959). Future prospects of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In J. Strachey (Ed & Trans). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (vol. XI). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed & Trans). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
- Goodley, D. (2017). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Harvey, C. (2017). Ethical emotional encounters: Contemplating challenges in psychoanalytically informed research. Psycho-analytic Psychotherapy in South Africa, 25(1), 34–65.Google Scholar
- Harvey, C. (in press). Subjectivity and the return of the abject in mothers of physically disabled children.Google Scholar
- Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: The total situation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66, 447–454.Google Scholar
- Long, C., & Eagle, G. (2009). Ethics in tension: Dilemmas for clinicians conducting sensitive research. Psycho-analytic Psychotherapy in South Africa, 17(2), 27–52.Google Scholar
- Marks, S., & Mönnich-Marks, H. (2003). The analysis of counter-transference reactions is a means to discern latent interview-contents. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), 36.Google Scholar
- Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar